Abstract There are three immunopathological mechanisms which account for the glomerular damage in the idiopathic crescentic GN syndrome. Type I patients have glomerular deposits of anti-GBM antibodies. Type II patients have immunohistologic evidence of immune aggregates along the glomerular basement membrane; type III patients have little or no immunoglobulin or complement deposition in the glomerulus. In all patients there is profound evidence of crescent formation. The pathogenesis of the glomerular crescent appears to involve the deposition of fibrin within Bowman's space and the migration of macrophages from the circulation into the area of fibrin deposition. The macrophage appears to be the cell which is central to the development of the lesion, although there is evidence that parietal epithelial cell proliferation also occurs. Recent experimental evidence has emphasized the role of the monocyte, not only in the generation of glomerular crescents, but also in the inflammatory reaction taking place in the glomerulus. These experimental data have raised the question of whether glomerular damage, particularly in the type III crescentic GN, may be the result of a pathogenetic process mediated by sensitized lymphocytes, rather than the classic humoral mechanisms. Irrespective of the pathogenetic mechanism, the ultimate concern of the clinician today is the effective therapy of the lesion, however empiric that therapy might be. Uncontrolled studies have supported approaches such as the use of anti-coagulants and antithrombotic agents, intravenous doses of massive amounts of methylprednisolone, and plasmapheresis therapy. The unfortunate clinician who must determine whether to use one or another unproven therapy with the attendant adverse side effects or accept the nihilistic approach of observing the natural course of this grim syndrome is left with a difficult decision. As there is little established data on which to base one's judgment, this decision must be made on a case-by-case basis and involves great caution and excellent therapeutic judgement. It has been said that clinical trials for the evaluation of treatment of various forms of crescentic GN are impossible because of the requirement for a cooperative multiple-clinic study and cumbersome investigative techniques. However, given the hint that certain of the uncontrolled observations of the effectiveness of therapy are valid and deserve substantiation, it seems inappropriate to continue to avoid the establishment of these studies. Surely, a great deal more money and manpower has been spent in biomedical research directed at more trivial problems. The establishment of clinical trials in this area is required if we are ever to approach the management of these patients rationally.
Read full abstract