Abstract The flexure of a non-linear elastic beam is described through a relationship between the bending moment M and the corresponding curvature χ of the centroid line and neglecting shear deformations. We consider an odd softening M−χ law with horizontal asymptotes M=±M0 for χ→±∞, so that the corresponding strain-energy density U(χ) is an even, non-nonconvex, function with oblique asymptotes. Considering the limit behavior of the total energy functional on sequences converging to singular functions, it is shown that the linear growth at infinity of U(·) is not sufficient to bind the curvature field, i.e., while maintaining the energy a finite value, infinite curvatures may occur at points of the beam. In the example considered, such singularities cannot be of the Cantor type but are represented by Dirac's masses concentrated at isolated points, which are interpreted as localized rotations, similar-in-type to those corresponding to the formation of plastic hinges in the engineering theory of elastic-plastic beams. The equilibrium configurations of the beam are discussed by considering the stationary points of a properly extended energy functional, introduced to take into account the possibility of concentrated rotations. Solutions, in general, are not unique, but unstable, locally-stable and globally-stable equilibrium states are recognized through their correspondence to saddle points, local minima or global minima of the energy functional. In particular, it is demonstrated that the globally stable equilibrium states can be equivalently investigated by introducing an auxiliary minimum problem involving the relaxed energy functional, obtained by replacing U(·) with its lower convex envelope U★★(·) (the corresponding M−χ relationship is similar in type to that of an elastic-perfectly-plastic beam, presenting a plateaux coinciding with the horizontal asymptotes). The possible difficulties derived from having assumed a softening moment-curvature relationship as the only constitutive descriptor of the beam behavior are finally summarized and, as an additional result, a new explanation of Wood and Roberts' paradox is obtained.
Read full abstract