You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 Apr 2023MP72-15 PREOPERATIVE MEDICAL CLEARANCE: UNVEILING PRIMARY CARE NEEDS AT A PUBLIC URBAN MEDICAL CENTER USING UROLOGIC CASE CANCELATION RATES Lauren Fink, Matthew Bruha, Frederick Okoye, Lauren Namkoong, Brian McNeil, and Llewellyn Hyacinthe Lauren FinkLauren Fink More articles by this author , Matthew BruhaMatthew Bruha More articles by this author , Frederick OkoyeFrederick Okoye More articles by this author , Lauren NamkoongLauren Namkoong More articles by this author , Brian McNeilBrian McNeil More articles by this author , and Llewellyn HyacintheLlewellyn Hyacinthe More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003340.15AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Elective surgical case cancelations are a common problem in healthcare, causing patient and staff dissatisfaction, and a financial burden on institutions. Underserved communities have unmet primary care needs, and case cancelations in these populations may reflect chronic disease burdens. We evaluate the role of urologic consultation in improving overall health by identifying undiagnosed or undermanaged conditions during preoperative evaluation METHODS: All canceled elective urologic procedures from two surgeons at one urban center were retrospectively analyzed from 1/2015-12/2019. Chart reviews were performed to obtain reason(s) for cancelation, demographics, medical interventions performed, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score pre- and post-operatively. Age-adjusted odds ratio (OR) was calculated for the association between preoperative ASA and medical interventions RESULTS: 1780 total elective cases were scheduled in our review. 551 canceled elective cases were identified with a 30% overall cancelation rate. 250 of those canceled cases were due to >1 undiagnosed or under-managed medical condition(s), representing 14% of the overall cancelation rate. 91.2% of patients were over 60 years old and African American. Notes were available for 111 (44.4%) of the 250 total cases canceled due to undiagnosed or under-managed medical conditions. 83% of these patients received their intended procedures. 35.1% of cases received medication adjustments, most commonly for cardiology and diabetes. Preoperative ASA>3 was found to be significantly associated with medical interventions of any kind (OR 2.6923 [1.1188-6.4788] p=0.0271) CONCLUSIONS: Elective urologic case cancelations were frequent and often related to comorbid conditions. Most patients canceled for medical reasons received optimization and then underwent surgery. ASA scores>3 may assist urologists in underserved urban areas in identifying patients who require medical intervention before elective surgery. Urologic consultation and subsequent preoperative clearance seem to provide a safety net for patients to receive optimization of their medical conditions that otherwise might go unmanaged. Case cancellations can have economic effects, also. Procedure slots are difficult to fill in on short notice. This paired with a high cancelation rate prevents opportunities to generate revenue. Appropriate consultation can eliminate pitfalls by allowing patients to obtain preoperative clearance prior to scheduling their elective cases Source of Funding: SUNY Downstate Medical Center © 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 209Issue Supplement 4April 2023Page: e1030 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Lauren Fink More articles by this author Matthew Bruha More articles by this author Frederick Okoye More articles by this author Lauren Namkoong More articles by this author Brian McNeil More articles by this author Llewellyn Hyacinthe More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...