Arterial occlusive disease is a generalized, progressive, and disabling condition that can significantly influence the quality of a patient’s life. When it affects peripheral vessels this chronic disease may cause considerable morbidity, particularly when it progresses to gangrene. At other sites it is responsible for an increased mortality from myocardial infarction and stroke. To improve some of this unfavourable outlook lower extremity bypass surgery down to the level of the ankle and foot has been recommended, even in elderly patients with extensive disease. Such procedures, however, are associated with a high failure rate leading to further surgical interventions and hospital stays. The traditionally reported outcomes of bypass operations are graft patency, limb salvage and patient survival 1 , but these indicators of surgical success are limited as measurements of outcome because they do not tell the whole story from the patient’s perspective. All vascular surgeons know that major amputation may sometimes be necessary in spite of graft patency, and that graft occlusion is not always associated with a reduction in quality of life. For a proper appreciation of the situation many factors must be considered, particularly delayed wound healing, residual postoperative pain and leg swelling, episodes of recurrent ischaemia, number of reoperations, maintenance of ambulation and residential status, opposite leg problems and cardiovascular events. Moreover, increasing emphasis has been placed in recent years on assessment of perception of well being, functional capacity and life quality 2 . Nicoloff et al. 3 found that only 14 per cent of patients who had limb salvage surgery achieved the ideal result of an uncomplicated operation with long-term symptom relief, preservation of functional status, and no recurrence or repeat operations. This disappointing picture occurred in spite of an excellent assisted primary graft patency rate of 77 per cent and a limb salvage rate of no less than 87 per cent at 5 years. To allow a more comprehensive view of the effectiveness of bypass surgery, including its impact on daily life and life satisfaction, outcome measurements of vascular interventions must reflect a more complete array of endpoints than those commonly applied. An important issue in the effectiveness of vascular surgery is the need for repeat operative intervention. From recent studies it is evident that many patients who had bypass surgery for limb salvage require ongoing reoperations for persistent or recurrent symptoms until their death, implying significant morbidity, discomfort, and additional costs 3,4 . We believe that additional interventions for a graft-related complication, recurrent leg ischaemia or delayed wound healing should be used as a principal outcome measure in clinical studies. It is also recognized that over time many patients treated for ischaemic symptoms in one leg will return with similar symptoms in the opposite leg 5 . The risk that symptoms will develop in the contralateral limb varies from 8 to 21 per cent per annum and emphasizes that peripheral arterial occlusive disease is essentially a two-limb problem. This information is important for patients, in particular for those with contralateral claudication, and should be discussed in full when considering surgery. Since atherosclerotic disease is
Read full abstract