(2819) Callitriche plena Raf. in Med. Repos., ser. 3, 2: 408. Feb–Apr 1811 [Angiosp.: Callitrich. / Plantagin.], nom. rej. prop. Typus: non designatus. This proposal is part of a complete revision of the Callitriche L. names published or treated by Constantine Samuel Rafinesque (1783–1840) (Hassemer & Lansdown, in prep.). Callitriche plena Raf. (in Med. Repos., ser. 3, 2: 408. 1811) was described through a brief diagnosis (“Foliis inferioribus oblongis, distantibus, superioribus, ovali-subrotundis, approximatis, floribus monoicis”), and provenance of the species was indicated as “Europa ad fossas, rivulos, &c.” No specimens or illustrations were cited in its protologue, and no original material (specimens or illustrations) could be located for this name. Based on careful consideration of the evidence available, i.e., the morphological, geographical (“Europa”) and environmental (“ad fossas, rivulos, &c.”) information provided in the protologue, we were able to narrow down the possibilities regarding the identity of C. plena to the following eight species: C. brutia Petagna (Inst. Bot. 2: 10. 1787), C. cophocarpa Sendtn. (Veg.-Verh. Bayer. Wald.: 230. 1860), C. hamulata Kütz. ex W.D.J. Koch (Syn. Fl. Germ. Helv.: 246. 1837) (often treated as an infraspecific taxon of C. brutia), C. lenisulca Clavaud (in Actes Soc. Linn. Bordeaux 44: 43. 1891), C. obtusangula Le Gall (Fl. Morbihan: 202, 822. 1852), C. platycarpa Kütz. (in Reichenbach, Iconogr. Bot. Pl. Crit. 9: 38–39. 1831), C. regis-jubae Schotsman (in Bull. Soc. Hist. Nat. Afrique N. 64: 25. 1974) and C. ×vigens K. Martinsson (in Nordic J. Bot. 11: 151. 1991). All these species are capable of growing with all leaves expanded, the upper more ovoid and forming a rosette, as well as having male and female flowers in different leaf axils on the same plant, which is our interpretation of “floribus monoicis”, as applied to the morphology of Callitriche. Unfortunately, in the absence of original material, it is impossible to narrow this list down further, owing to the scant morphological information provided by Rafinesque. All eight species names listed above, except C. brutia, are posterior to C. plena. Also, all of these species could have been available to Rafinesque for study, considering his travels in Europe (Boewe, Rafinesque Anthology. 2005; Boewe, Life Rafinesque. 2011). The name C. plena could possibly be neotypified with a specimen belonging to any of those species; such a typification would not be in conflict with its protologue, and thus would need to be accepted. If the specimen in question would belong to any species other than C. brutia, the name C. plena would become the correct name for that species. Nevertheless, adoption of C. plena as the correct name for any European species of Callitriche would be extremely disruptive to nomenclatural stability, considering the unacceptable degree of arbitrariness that would be involved in any putative typification of this name. Furthermore, the name C. plena has not seen any use in the taxonomic literature other than in the work that includes its protologue (i.e., Rafinesque, l.c.). Callitriche plena is presented as an “unplaced name” in Plants of the World Online (http://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:430038-1). Therefore, C. plena should be considered a potentially disruptive name. Thus, with the objective of preventing a nomenclatural change that would be evidently disadvantageous to nomenclatural stability, and in accordance with Art. 56 of the ICN (Turland & al. in Regnum Veg. 159. 2018), the name C. plena is here proposed for rejection. Because it will remain impossible to ascertain Rafinesque's intended identity for this name, we consider it more appropriate to have this name rejected than to propose, arbitrarily, its neotypification by an element identifiable as the earlier C. brutia. Acceptance of this proposal would neutralise the threat posed by C. plena to a number of well-established, unequivocal names of European species of Callitriche. Rejection of this proposal would mean that C. plena could eventually come to replace some well-established, unequivocal name of a European species of Callitriche. GH, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4365-6934 RVL, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0984-4552 We are grateful to John McNeill and John Wiersema for improving this proposal.