Vascular access-site complications are the most frequent complications of percutaneous catheter ablation (CA) of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs). Whether arterial/venous vascular closure devices (VCDs) prevent vascular complications is unknown. We investigated the benefit of VCDs in patients undergoing CA of VAs. Consecutive CA of VAs were included (2018-2022). Vascular accesses were obtained with ultrasound guidance. At the discretion of the operator, arterial and/or venous VCDs were used. Cases were divided into 3 groups: no use of VCDs for any of the arterial/venous accesses (manual compression - MC), use of VCDs for some but not the all of the accesses (Partial-VCDs), use of VCDs for all of the accesses (Complete-VCDs). Vascular complications were defined minor if they didn't require intervention or major if they required intervention. A total of 1,016 procedures were performed in 872 patients (62±13 years, BMI 30±6 kg/m2, 27% female) during the study period. Femoral arterial access was obtained in 887 procedures (875 single access - 7.4±1.5 Fr size, 12 two accesses - 7.3±3 Fr and 6.9±1.8 Fr). Femoral venous access was obtained in 1,014 procedures (unilateral in 17%, bilateral in 83%, mean N. 2.6±0.7, 8.4±1.3 Fr). Hemostasis was achieved with MC in 192 (19%) procedures, Partial-VCD in 275 (27%), and Complete-VCD in 549 (54%). A vascular complication occurred in 52 (5.1%) procedures, including a minor hematoma in 3.9% and/or a major complication in 1.7%. The rate of vascular complications was 6.8% (5.2% minor and 1.6% major) in the MC group, 7.6% (5.1% minor and 3.3% major) in the Partial-VCD group, and 3.3% (2.9% minor and 0.9% major, P=0.014 for comparison) in the Complete-VCD group. At multivariable analysis, Complete-VCD remained independently associated with lower risk of vascular complications (odds ratio 0.69, 95% confidence interval 0.48 to 0.96, P=0.036). In patients undergoing CA of VAs, Complete-VCD is associated with lower rates of vascular-related complications compared to MC or Partial-VCD.