The article presents the results of a study of the problem of organizing education in schools in the occupied territories of Ukraine during the Second World War and during the current Russian occupation. Attention is focused on the common and distinctive features of the two occupation regimes in the context of the organization of educational activities, as well as on the characteristics of the content and forms, goals and means of education used by the occupation regimes in the occupied territories. The author analyzes the educational policy pursued by the German occupation administration, internal contradictions and contradictory approaches of the fascist leadership to the functioning of Ukrainian schooling. The author emphasizes the unanimity of the Russian occupation authorities in the field of educational policy in the occupied territories. It is claimed that, despite the considerable historical distance, the two occupation regimes have many similarities in their approaches to the organization of educational activities in the occupied territories of Ukraine. It is emphasized that the enemy realize the crucial role of education in shaping the consciousness of future generations. The occupiers give a prominent place in the process of educating citizens loyal to the new government or loyal to it to teachers and pedagogical workers of all levels of education. At best, the occupiers suspend teachers who are disloyal to the new government, and more often arrest and convict them. It is noted that, just like eighty years ago, the willingness of teachers to cooperate with the occupiers is not widespread, but it is not isolated. In addition, during the occupation, there is a rapid replacement of textbooks with ideologically "correct" ones. However, significant differences in the educational policies of the German and Russian occupiers are also emphasized: the Germans primarily opposed Soviet ideology, while the Russians openly oppose Ukrainian culture, language, and Ukrainians in general, which leads to genocide and linguocide. The historical context of the occupation is also important, because the events that took place in the first half of the twentieth century are practically repeated almost a hundred years later, when liberalism and democracy prevail in Europe.
Read full abstract