We compared the density and species richness of birds with the wildlife habitats found on four golf courses in the lower Fraser Valley region of British Columbia. From November 1990 to July 1991, 82 species of birds were observed during 120 bird counts. Twenty-nine species were considered to belong to the community of birds likely to be found on golf courses. Five species: the mallard (Anas platyrhynchos), northwestern crow (Corrus caurinus), black-capped chickadee (Parus atricapillus), American robin (Turdus migratorius) and European starling (Sturnus vulgaris) were considered common. Bird density was greatest on ponds and waterways. Species richness was highest in hedgerows and wooded areas where foliage and vegetation at ground level had not been removed. Turf surfaces had the lowest density of birds and were the lowest in species richness. The popularity of golf has increased greatly in the past 20 years, resulting in a large number of proposals for new courses (Argyle et al. 1991). In British Columbia, many golf course developments are at the interface between expanding population centers and diminishing rural lands (Argyle et al. 1991, Moore 1990, Kerr et al. 1985). Golf courses were found to be a useful habitat for some species of wildlife in England (Green and Marshall 1987). However, a review of published literature showed little information on wildlife use of golf courses in North America. In an effort to foster the inclusion of wildlife habitat within new golf courses, we undertook to survey the birds found on existing courses and to compare bird numbers and species richness with the habitats offered. This study was part of a larger project looking at interactions between wildlife and pesticides on British Columbia golf courses (Moul and Elliott 1992). STUDY AREA AND METHODS Birds were counted on Beach Grove, Point Grey, Surrey and Tsawwassen golf courses, located from Vancouver to Surrey in the lower Fraser Valley region of British Columbia, Canada (Fig. 1). The courses were chosen to reflect a range of potential wildlife habitat from very open sites with minimal tree cover to others with large areas of trees and hedgerows. On each course we surveyed and flagged three or four 100 m wide survey areas or belts, (transects) parallel to each other and separated by 50 m. Transect lengths were not equal on each course, but reflected the maximum area achievable within the confines of course dimensions. Where a transect incorporated only a portion of a pond, the additional water area was added to the total survey area. The total study area on the four courses was 69.9 ha. Within each of the transects the major vegetation was mapped and the habitats classified as: (1) turf-all areas of intensive turf maintenance including the greens, tees, fairways and areas of rough not associated with trees, shrubs or brush; (2) hedgerowall areas of trees and shrubs where underbrush and ground covering vegetation was minimally maintained and allowed to grow naturally; (3) trees-individual or grouped trees or shrubs of any species where underbrush had been removed; (4) water-all lakes, ponds, streams and ditches. To estimate the area of each habitat tpe, acetate overlays depicting each habitat, at a scale of 1:1200, were placed on 1/4 inch graph paper and t-he proportion of each habitat was determined by counting squares. We visited each course 30 times from 30 November 1990 to 1 July 1991 at approximately one week intervals. Surveys began at first light and lasted between two and four hours depending on the course surveyed. We walked the center of each transect and recorded the species and the location of all birds seen or heard within the transect area. Waterfowl using rain pools on turf areas were
Read full abstract