Background: The feasibility of an individual's genetic background to guide antihypertensive drug treatment to replace the current one-size-fits-all strategy remains to be proven. Activation of the Na-K pump signalling pathway by proteins encoded by genetic variants of adducin and enzymes involved in the endogenous ouabain synthesis and transport lead to increased renal tubular sodium reabsorption, volume expansion and hypertension. Rostafuroxin is a powerful, safe and selective inhibitor of these mechanisms. This study is aimed at evaluating whether rostafuroxin is more effective than losartan in reducing blood pressure in carriers of these gene variants. Methods: In a parallel-group, double-masked, randomised phase 2 trial, 13 Italian and 15 Taiwanese centres enrolled never-treated (naive) patients with office blood pressure ranging from 140 to 169 mmHg systolic (OSBP) and from 85 to 100 mmHg diastolic (ODBP) blood pressure, respectively. After stratification for country and genetic background (variants in ADD1, ADD3, ABCB1/MDR1, HSD3B1, and LSS genes grouped in profile 2 (P2), as described in the previous OASIS-HT study or with the addition of other gene variants grouped in the profile 1(P1) , patients were randomised using a computerised random function to rostafuroxin 6 γ (in Italy only), 50 γ or 500 γ or losartan 50 mg, all once daily. The OSBP change two months after randomisation was the primary endpoint. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03217825 and with EudraCT number, 2010-022073-34. Findings: Of 902 screened patients, 171/470 (36·4%) were enrolled in Italy and 107/432 (24·8%) in Taiwan, of whom two Italian and five Taiwanese were excluded. In Caucasians carrying P2a, from a baseline around 150 mmHg, OSBP significantly (p value from=0.002 to <0.001) decreased in mmHg (95% confidence interval) 10·8 (4·0-17·5), 23·0 (16·0-29·9), 17·4 (11·0-23·7), and 13·2 (7·2-19·2) on 6, 50 and 500 γ rostafuroxin and 50 mg losartan, respectively. The between-group differences (rostafuroxin 50 γ minus losartan) was 9·8 (0·6-19·0) with p=0·038 and 13·4 (25·4-2·5) with p=0·031 in P2a and LSS 2254524 AA carriers respectively, but not for the other rostafuroxin doses (p=0·319). Chinese with corresponding genetic background, had similar OSBP fall to that of Caucasians with losartan but no change with rostafuroxin. Serious adverse events: none in Caucasian and one in Chinese. Interpretation: The tendency towards a bell-shaped OSBP dose-response curve in Caucasians with a maximum at 50 γ is in line with previous observations and represents the first proof-of-concept in humans that genetic profiling may in the future guide antihypertensive drug treatment. This opens new perspectives for drugs design, based on genetically encoded variability in proteins causally involved in the pathogenesis of hypertension. Funding: CVie Therapeutics and Windtree Therapeutics. Declaration of Interest: GB, as it may be seen from the introduction and discussion, this study is the last of a long series aimed at detecting a target “causal” molecular mechanism(s) of hypertension amenable to be “corrected” by a small molecule in patients. To this end, GB was employee of the Universita Vita Salute San Raffaele, Milano and consultant of pharmaceutical companies, that changed over time (Prassis Sigma Tau; CVie Therapeutics, Taipei; Windtree Therapeutics, Warrington, USA), receiving a salary from the former and a consultancy from the latters, this being well known to both parties. In 2015, as Emeritus Professor, GB changed his position from consultant to employee at CVie Therapeutics first and at Windtree Therapeutics later. PF is consultant of CVie Therapeutics, Taipei, Taiwan first, and then of Windtree Therapeutics, Warrington, PA, USA. LC and SC received personal fees from CVie Therapeutics, Taipei, Taiwan. LFL was employee of CVie Therapeutics Taipei Taiwan. BL was CEO of CVie therapeutics Taipei Taiwan. CVie Therapeutis and Windree Therapeutics paid research grants for this study to the Institutions of GAS, NG, RB, CEC, TDW, and KLW, PM. DC, JAS and CL have no conflicts of interest to declare. Ethical Approval: Local ethics committees approved the research protocol.