Although statistical methods exist for the calculation of sample size and for the analysis of standard endpoint trials with nonproportional hazards, the impact of nonproportional hazards on the properties of sequential clinical trials has not been well studied. In this article we use simulation to evaluate the impact of nonproportional hazards on the power of standard group sequential methods. We consider boundaries designed to reject H0 only, H1 only, or both H0 and H1.Key findings include: (1) The presence of onset lag causes a greater decrease in the power of a sequential method than the power of the fixed-sample method. The impact is particularly great on sequential methods that allow for early rejection of H1; in some cases, the power of these methods may have a ceiling that cannot be crossed regardless of the true biologic effect of the treatment. (2) The presence of noncompliance (as measured by permanent discontinuation of study medication) causes a smaller impact on the power of a sequential method than on the power of the fixed-sample method. In fact, when the rate of noncompliance is high, sequential methods, particularly those that allow early rejection of H0, can have greater power than a fixed-sample approach.
Read full abstract