Treatment Options For Venous Thromboembolism Research Articles

Venous thromboembolism management in people with cystic fibrosis.

Rates of venous thromboembolism (VTE) are increasing in people with cystic fibrosis (PwCF). Providers treating VTE in PwCF have reported low confidence concerning anticoagulant drug selection, dose, duration, and drug-drug interactions. As there are currently no published reports regarding management of VTE in PwCF, our objective was to describe the management of VTE in PwCF. PwCF and VTE at the University of Utah Health were identified through electronic medical record searches. Patients were categorized into one of three treatment groups: warfarin, direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC), and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). The primary outcome was episodes of major bleeding. Secondary outcomes included clinically relevant nonmajor (CRNM) bleeding. Nine PwCF with a total of 12 unique VTE episodes were included in the study, with all but one episode associated with a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC). Of the 12 VTE cases, 25% were treated with warfarin, 50% with a DOAC, and 25% with LMWH. There were no episodes of major bleeding and only one episode of CRNM bleeding (Hemoptysis) in the LMWH group. All anticoagulant doses and durations generally followed guidelines for persons without CF. DOACs were the most common VTE treatment, at doses and duration consistent with guidelines for persons without CF, with no major or CRNM bleeding. VTE treatment in PwCF is generally consistent with guidelines for persons without CF with low rates of bleeding. DOACs are a potential option for treatment of VTE in PwCF, but more research is needed.

Low Dose Apixaban As Secondary Prophylaxis for Venous Thromboembolism in Cancer Patients, 30 Months Follow-up

Background: Apixaban is a treatment option for venous thromboembolism (VTE) in cancer patients. There are no data on the effect of low dose apixaban after 6 months treatment. We wanted to assess the efficacy and safety of apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily as prophylaxis for recurrent VTE after 6 months initial treatment with full-dose apixaban.Patients and methods: We included 298 patients with cancer and any type of VTE. All patients were treated with full dose apixaban for the first 6 months. After 6 months, all patients with active cancer continued with apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily and were followed for the next 30 months. The primary endpoint of efficacy was recurrent VTE, the primary safety endpoint was major bleedings. Clinically relevant non-major bleedings was a secondary endpoint. The endpoints are reported as incidence rates or fractions with 95% confidence intervals, and as Kaplan-Meier plots.Results: During the first 6 months of full-dose anticoagulation 12 of 298 patients had recurrent VTE (4.0%, 95% confidence interval 2.1-6.9), 16 experienced major bleeding (5.4%, 95% CI 2.8-7.9%), and 26 patients experienced one or more episodes of CRNMB (8.9%, 95% CI 5.5-12) as previously reported. 1 Of the 298 patients included, 196 continued with apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily after 6 months. During treatment from 6 to 36 months with low-dose apixaban 15 of 196 (7.6%, 95% CI: 4.4-12) patients had recurrent VTE, 7 (3.6%, CI: 1.5-7.2) patients experienced major bleeding and 16 (8.2%, 95% CI: 4.7-13) patients experienced CRNMB. The highest incidence rate of both recurrent VTE and major bleedings were seen during the first month of full-dose apixaban (Table 1). After the dose reduction of apixaban, the incidence rate of recurrent VTE increased slightly during 6 to 12 months while the incidence rate of major bleeding decreased during the same time-period. After 12 months the incidence rate of both recurrent VTE and major bleeding was low and remained low during the entire 30 months follow-up (Table 1 and Figure 1). The Kaplan-Meier plot of the composite endpoint of recurrent VTE or major bleeding did not change after dose-reduction. After about 9 months treatment (i.e. 3 months on low dose apixaban) the Kaplan-Meier curve of the composite endpoint flattened out.Conclusion: Dose reduction of apixaban to 2.5 mg twice daily after 6 months of full dose anticoagulation resulted in a small increase in recurrent VTE, but a marked decrease in major bleedings during the 6-12 months period. After approximately 9 months the frequency of recurrent VTE and major bleedings remained low compared with the first 6 months of full-dose treatment. Reducing the dose of apixaban to 2.5 mg twice daily after 6 months of full-dose treatment appears safe and effective.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Vitamin K Antagonists for Venous Thromboembolism in China.

Background: The drug therapy of venous thromboembolism (VTE) presents a significant economic burden to the health-care system in low- and middle-income countries. To understand which anticoagulation therapy is most cost-effective for clinical decision-making , the cost-effectiveness of apixaban (API) versus rivaroxaban (RIV), dabigatran (DAB), and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), followed by vitamin K antagonist (VKA), in the treatment of VTE in China was assessed. Methods: To access the quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), a long-term cost-effectiveness analysis was constructed using a Markov model with 5 health states. The Markov model was developed using patient data collected from the Xijing Hospital from January 1, 2016 to January 1, 2021. The time horizon was set at 30 years, and a 6-month cycle length was used in the model. Costs and ICERs were reported in 2020 U.S. dollars. One-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) were used to test the uncertainties. A Chinese health-care system perspective was used. Results: In the base case, the data of 231 VTE patients were calculated in the base case analysis retrospectively. The RIV group resulted in a mean VTE attributable to 95% effective treatment. API, DAB, and VKA have a negative ICER (−187017.543, −284,674.922, and −9,283.339, respectively) and were absolutely dominated. The Markov model results confirmed this observation. The ICER of the API and RIV was negative (−216176.977), which belongs to the absolute inferiority scheme, and the ICER value of the DAB and VKA versus RIV was positive (110,577.872 and 836,846.343). Since the ICER of DAB and VKA exceeds the threshold, RIV therapy was likely to be the best choice for the treatment of VTE within the acceptable threshold range. The results of the sensitivity analysis revealed that the model output varied mostly with the cost in the DAB on-treatment therapy. In a probabilistic sensitivity analysis of 1,000 patients for 30 years, RIV has 100% probability of being cost-effective compared with other regimens when the WTP is $10973 per QALY. When WTP exceeded $148,000, DAB was more cost-effective than RIV. Conclusions: Compared with LMWH + VKA and API, the results proved that RIV may be the most cost-effective treatment for VTE patients in China. Our findings could be helpful for physicians in clinical decision-making to select the appropriate treatment option for VTE.

Ilio-femoral venous thrombosis with hereditary antithrombin deficiency: a case report of rare thrombotic disease and successful treatment with catheter directed thrombolysis

BackgroundHereditary antithrombin (AT) deficiency is an uncommon autosomal dominant thrombogenic disorder, which can cause venous thromboembolism (VTE). Although conservative treatment options for hereditary AT deficiency-associated VTE such as anticoagulation (warfarin, direct oral anticoagulant, or heparin), intravenous thrombolysis, and recombinant AT are well known, interventional treatment options have not been reported so far.Case summaryA 19-year-old man with a family history of thrombogenic diseases, referred to our hospital with left leg pain, was diagnosed with AT deficiency-associated VTE. In the absence of symptomatic relief with intravenous thrombolysis and anticoagulation, he received venous intervention and catheter directed thrombolysis (CDT) for 4 days for left iliac venous thrombosis. Following a second venous intervention, venous thrombus disappeared almost entirely on cross-sectional imaging, and his symptoms improved. He was discharged on apixaban and has been recurrence-free for one and a half years.DiscussionThis case presents CDT and maintenance therapy with apixaban as possible treatment options for VTE in patients with hereditary AT deficiency, especially following failure of conservative therapy. Individual risks and benefits should be considered when CDT is performed for acute VTE in patients with AT deficiency.

Comparison of long-term treatment options for venous thromboembolism

Comparison of long-term treatment options for venous thromboembolism

Impact of health utility after thrombotic complications following total hip and knee arthroplasty.

Medical complications and preexisting conditions frequently place the surgeon in the unenviable position of choosing between the serious and potentially life-threatening effects of thrombosis, or the issue of bleeding and surgical site complications. The aim of this research was to determine if health utility could be a consideration before choosing to therapeutically anticoagulate in the hip and knee arthroplasty patient. The quantitative risks and effectiveness of treatment options for venous thromboembolism, atrial fibrillation, acute coronary syndromes, ischaemic stroke and mechanical heart valves were evaluated from previously published data. Previously calculated health utility values were obtained from published studies for both thrombotic events and anticoagulant-related complications at the site of arthroplasty. An impact score was generated through a multiplication of 1 - utility with the rate of the event occurring. Impact scores associated with revision surgery and deep infection at the arthroplasty site following anticoagulation are higher compared to impact scores in subsets of non-treated venous thromboembolism, low CHADS2 (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age >75, diabetes (1 point each), stroke/transient ischaemic attack (2 points)) atrial fibrillation and potentially some acute coronary syndrome patients. Some anticoagulation strategies in mechanical heart valves are of definite overall patient value due to the significant complications otherwise. Objective calculation of both the benefit and risks of anticoagulation in the post-operative patient is significantly altered by including the effect on patient's quality of life utility value. Therapeutic anticoagulation in some common situations is probable to be of more detriment than benefit when considering health utility.

Treatment options for venous thromboembolism: lessons learnt from clinical trials.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), comprising deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, is a common condition associated with a significant clinical and economic burden. Anticoagulant therapy is the mainstay of treatment for VTE, having been shown to reduce the risk of death in patients with pulmonary embolism, and recurrence or extension of thrombi in patients with deep vein thrombosis during the initial treatment period. Long-term anticoagulation is indicated in some individuals with VTE, depending on individual risk of VTE recurrence and anticoagulant-related bleeding. Management of VTE in clinical practice is often complex because patients’ characteristics and treatment needs may differ considerably from those encountered in clinical trials. Current guidelines recommend the use of either low molecular weight heparins or fondaparinux overlapping with and followed by a vitamin K antagonist for the initial treatment of VTE, with the vitamin K antagonist continued when long-term anticoagulation is required. These traditional anticoagulants have practical limitations that have led to the development of direct oral anticoagulants that directly target either Factor Xa or thrombin and are administered at a fixed dose without the need for routine coagulation monitoring. This review discusses practical considerations for hospital physicians and haematologists in the management of VTE treatment, including the potential for the direct oral anticoagulants to simplify treatment.

Treatment Patterns and Outcomes among Hospitalized Patients with Venous Thromboembolism in the United States: An Analysis of Electronic Health Records Data

Background: With the advent of new treatment options for venous thromboembolism (VTE), it is valuable to gain insights into current clinical practices. Objective: Assess treatment patterns and recurrence among patients hospitalized for VTE. Methods: This retrospective study evaluated patients hospitalized with an incident VTE diagnosis (index) from 2008 to 2012 in a de-identified electronic health record database. Patients were further required to receive anticoagulant treatment and/or a VTE-related procedure for study inclusion. Patients were excluded if they: (1) did not have a medical encounter in the 6 months before index (baseline); (2) had a prior VTE diagnosis or used an anticoagulant during the baseline period; or (3) had a diagnosis of atrial fibrillation/flutter, cardiomyopathy, or a coagulation disorder during baseline or the year after index (follow-up). Hospitalization for recurrent VTE and bleeding were evaluated. Results: A total of 2060 patients were identified (mean age, 60.9 years; 53.0% women), with a mean length of stay of 8.1 days. Of the VTE types, acute DVT was the most common (41.9%), followed by PE (33.3%), and DVT + PE (24.7%). Almost all patients (96.9%) received anticoagulants, of which 94.3% received heparin and 76.5% received warfarin. Although 77.4% of warfarin users were prescribed it at discharge, only (40.2%) had a warfarin prescription within 30 days of discharge. Overall 30 day, 90 day and 1-year VTE recurrence rates were 2.0%, 4.2%, and 7.5%, respectively, and the major bleeding rate was 6.8%. Conclusion: In a real-world population of hospitalized VTE patients, heparin treatment in combination with warfarin was common. However, continuation of warfarin post-discharge was challenging. Initiatives to improve continuation of therapy may be important to reduce VTE recurrence.

Subcutaneous Unfractionated Heparin for Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism in End-Stage Renal Disease

To report 3 cases of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) treated with subcutaneous unfractionated heparin (UFH) bridged with warfarin. Three patients with ESRD were successfully treated for VTE with unmonitored, fixed-dose subcutaneous UFH every 12 hours and dose-adjusted warfarin. The first patient was initiated on continuous infusion UFH for deep-vein thrombosis, but due to poor vascular access, nurses were unable to consistently measure anti-Xa levels. Therefore, subcutaneous UFH 17,500 units (∼245 units/kg/dose) every 12 hours was initiated. Oral warfarin 5 mg/day was started the following day. The patient received 4 days of inpatient subcutaneous UFH and then was discharged to complete the bridge as an outpatient. The second patient received subcutaneous UFH 10,000 units (∼244 units/kg/dose) every 12 hours and oral warfarin 2.5 mg/day to treat a nonocclusive thrombus along her right femoral vein hemodialysis catheter. The patient received 1 day of inpatient subcutaneous UFH treatment prior to discharge and continued bridge therapy with warfarin as an outpatient. The third patient was initiated on subcutaneous UFH 20,000 units (∼223 units/kg/dose) every 12 hours and oral warfarin 7.5 mg/day due to a subtherapeutic INR (1.50) 5 days after receiving fresh frozen plasma to reduce her therapeutic INR for a procedure. The patient received 2 doses of subcutaneous UFH as an inpatient before treatment was discontinued because her INR was therapeutic at 2.3. Subcutaneous UFH has been used to treat VTE since the early 1980s; however, with the advent of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), subcutaneous UFH use diminished. Several studies comparing the use of subcutaneous UFH to both continuous infusion UFH and LMWH concluded that subcutaneous UFH is a safe and efficacious alternative. The 2008 Chest Guidelines for Antithrombotic Therapy for Venous Thromboembolic Disease support the use of subcutaneous UFH for the treatment of VTE with a Grade 1A recommendation and provide a Grade 2C recommendation for use of UFH over LMWH for patients with VTE and severe renal failure. Safe and convenient treatment options for VTE in patients with ESRD are limited. Fixed-dose, unmonitored subcutaneous UFH as a bridge to warfarin therapy is an effective option in patients with ESRD and those with financial restrictions. The pharmacist plays a key role in identifying patients for whom subcutaneous UFH treatment may be a viable alternative, recommending an appropriate dosing regimen, and educating health-care professionals and patients about safe use.

Anticoagulation Strategies for Venous Thromboembolism

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) continues to be a major source of morbidity and mortality in the United States with an estimated incidence of greater than 600 000 clinically evident cases each year. It results in more than 200 000 deaths per year and is thought to be the number one cause of preventable in-hospital deaths. This review presents the history, pathophysiology, diagnostic considerations, and treatment options for VTE.

Thrombosis in the intensive care unit: etiology, diagnosis, management, and prevention in adults and children.

Venous thromboembolism, a well-recognized complication in postoperative patients, is emerging as a frequent complication in critically ill patients in intensive care units. Diagnosis can be particularly difficult in such patients because underlying systemic illnesses may mask common presenting signs and symptoms. Although numerous independent risk factors have been identified, the critical role of both central venous catheters and prothrombotic disorders as significant risk factors is a common theme in the pediatric and adult literature. Various diagnostic tests exist, with venography remaining the gold standard and newer, less invasive methods such as ultrasonography and impedance plethysmography becoming increasingly popular. Standard unfractionated heparin remains the mainstay of therapy and prophylaxis, although the use of low molecular weight heparins is becoming more commonplace. Thrombolytic therapy continues to be reserved for severe, life-threatening, acute thrombosis. In this article, we review the common risk factors, diagnostic modalities, and treatment options for venous thromboembolism in critically ill adult and pediatric patients.

Cancer, Coagulation, and Anticoagulation

Thromboembolic disease affects about 15% of cancer patients and presents a challenge to the oncologist for both prophylaxis and treatment. Although long known to be associated with malignancy, the underlying biochemical mechanisms are poorly understood. Both low-dose warfarin and low molecular weight heparin are effective strategies for prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism, including those involving venous access devices. Current treatment options for venous thromboembolism include heparin (unfractionated and low molecular weight), warfarin, and internal vena cava filters. The appropriate use of these therapeutic options in cancer patients is reviewed herein. There is suggestive evidence that heparin may be superior to warfarin in the long-term treatment of venous thromboembolism. Whether anticoagulants might also improve cancer survival rates independent of their effect on thromboembolism deserves further investigation.