Abstract
Thromboembolic disease affects about 15% of cancer patients and presents a challenge to the oncologist for both prophylaxis and treatment. Although long known to be associated with malignancy, the underlying biochemical mechanisms are poorly understood. Both low-dose warfarin and low molecular weight heparin are effective strategies for prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism, including those involving venous access devices. Current treatment options for venous thromboembolism include heparin (unfractionated and low molecular weight), warfarin, and internal vena cava filters. The appropriate use of these therapeutic options in cancer patients is reviewed herein. There is suggestive evidence that heparin may be superior to warfarin in the long-term treatment of venous thromboembolism. Whether anticoagulants might also improve cancer survival rates independent of their effect on thromboembolism deserves further investigation.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
