Treatment Of Low Back Pain Research Articles

A review article on Katrigraha vis-à-vis Mechanical low back pain and its management through Ayurveda

In the present society, all age group people experience back pain, which is brought on by an unhealthy food and way of life. In Ayurveda, this ailment is compared to Katigraha, one of the Vataja Nanatmaja Vyadhi. It is a condition where pain and stiffness are brought on by Shuddha Vata or Sama Vata, which are concentrated in Kati Pradesha. Modern science says that actions like lifting heavy objects, bending, having poor posture, being sedentary, etc. cause Mechanical low back pain. It is usually limited to the lumbosacral region, buttock, or thigh and doesn't go past the knees. Modern medical treatments for low back pain have their own disadvantages and weren't effective over the long term. The Ayurvedic Chikitsa Sutra of Katigraha includes a description of Snehana, Swedana, Shamana, and Conventional Rasayana in addition to a healthy food and way of life. The breadth of Ayurvedic treatment for Katigraha shall be the main topic of the current paper.

NADA Ear Acupuncture and Medical Acupuncture for Pain- and Health-Related Quality of Life among Older Patients with Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain: A Prospective Clinical Trial.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of the NADA (National Acupuncture Detoxification Association)-standardized ear acupuncture protocol in comparison to medical acupuncture (MA) in the treatment of chronic nonspecific low back pain (LBP) in older adults. This was a prospective, clinical, single center, open label, comparative study. A total of 60 older patients with chronic nonspecific LBP were enrolled in the study. The patients were divided into two groups. The MA group received treatment with medical acupuncture (MA), while the NADA group received NADA ear acupuncture once a day for 20 min, for a total of 10 sessions. The co-primary outcome measures were the reduction in pain intensity evaluated by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) compared to baseline and improvement in patients' quality of life (QOL) assessed in the SF-36 questionnaire before and after treatment; this was compared between the two groups. After two weeks of treatment, a significant reduction compared to baseline was observed in the NRS scores following treatment with medical acupuncture as well as after the utilization of NADA ear acupuncture protocol: NRS score for average pain experienced by the patients over the previous week (NRSa) MA: p = 0.002; NADA: p < 0.001, maximum NRS score in the past week (NRSm) MA: p < 0.001; NADA: p < 0.001, and NRS score at the time of examination (NRSe) MA: p = 0.001; NADA: p < 0.001. Reduction of the NRSa score compared to baseline was significantly greater in the NADA group (p = 0.034). Significant improvements in the QOL of patients according to the SF-36 questionnaire compared to baseline were observed in the MA group in the following domains: PF (p = 0.003), RP (p = 0.002), SF (p = 0.041), RE (p = 0.005), MH (p = 0.043), HT (p = 0.013), PCS (p = 0.004), and MCS (p = 0.025); and in the NADA group, in the following domains: PF (p = 0.004), RP (p = 0.048), BP (p = 0.001), VT (p = 0.035), RE (p = 0.006), MH (p < 0.001), HT (p = 0.003), PCS (p < 0.001), and MCS (p < 0.001). There were minor complications observed in 35% of patients (total of 20 participants); 31% (9 patients) in the MA group and 39% (11 patients) in the NADA group. These were minor and quickly resolved, including insertion point pain, minor bleeding after needle removal, and one instance of fainting. No patients in either group reported worsening of LBP. These complications occurred in 4.14% of MA sessions (12 times/290 sessions) and in 6.07% of NADA acupuncture sessions (16 times/280 sessions). The outcomes of this study suggest that both MA and NADA ear acupuncture could be a valuable and personalized component of a comprehensive approach to managing chronic nonspecific LBP in older patients. Incorporation of MA and NADA ear acupuncture into the clinical management of chronic nonspecific LBP in elderly patients has the potential to reduce pain intensity and improve the overall quality of life of affected individuals. However, further studies are needed to confirm our findings.

Abstract No. 265 Basivertebral Nerve Ablation for the Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain with Modic Changes in a Community Practice Setting: 12 Months Follow-Up

Abstract No. 265 Basivertebral Nerve Ablation for the Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain with Modic Changes in a Community Practice Setting: 12 Months Follow-Up

Changes of trunk muscle stiffness in individuals with low back pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Low back pain (LBP) is one of the most common musculoskeletal conditions. People with LBP often display changes of neuromuscular control and trunk mechanical properties, including trunk stiffness. Although a few individual studies have examined back muscle stiffness in individuals with LBP, a synthesis of the evidence appears to be lacking. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to synthesize and evaluate the available literature investigating back muscle stiffness in association with LBP. We conducted a systematic review of the literature according to the PRISMA guidelines. We searched Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science and ScienceDirect for studies, that compared back muscle stiffness, measured either by ultrasound-based elastography or myotonometry, between individuals with and without LBP. Pooled data of the included studies were presented descriptively. Additionally, we performed two meta-analyses to calculate the standardized mean difference between the two groups for resting stiffness of the multifidus and erector spinae muscle. For both meta-analyses, the random effect model was used and the weight of individual studies was calculated using the inverse-variance method. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Analytical Cross-Sectional studies. Furthermore, the certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE approach. Nine studies were included in our systematic review. Our results suggest that individuals with LBP have higher stiffness of the multifidus (SMD = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.15 - 0.81, p < 0.01; I2 = 48 %, p=0.11) and erector spinae at rest (SMD = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.11 - 0.62, p < 0.01; I2 = 39 %, p=0.14) compared to asymptomatic controls. On the other hand, the evidence regarding muscle stiffness during submaximal contractions is somewhat contradictory. Based on the findings of this systematic review we conclude that people with LBP may have higher back muscle stiffness compared to asymptomatic controls. Addressing muscle stiffness might represent an important goal of LBP treatment. Nevertheless, our findings should be interpreted with extreme caution due to a limited quality of evidence, small number of included studies and differences in measurement methodology.

Disparities in Provider Ordering Practices of Image-Guided Interventions and Surgery for Patients With Low Back Pain: A Cohort Study

ObjectiveTo assess individual- and neighborhood-level sociodemographic factors associating with providers’ ordering of nonpharmacologic treatments for patients with low back pain (LBP), specifically physical therapy, image-guided interventions, and lumbar surgery. MethodsOur cohort included all patients diagnosed with LBP from 2000 to 2017 in a statewide database of all hospitals and ambulatory surgical facilities within Utah. We compared sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of (1) patients with LBP who received any treatment with those who received none and (2) patients with LBP who received invasive LBP treatments with those who only received noninvasive LBP treatments using the Student’s t test, Wilcoxon’s rank-sum tests, and Pearson’s χ2 tests, as applicable, and two separate multivariate logistic regression models: (1) to determine whether sociodemographic characteristics were risk factors for receiving any LBP treatments and (2) risk factors for receiving invasive LBP treatments. ResultsIndividuals in the most disadvantaged neighborhoods were less likely to receive any nonpharmacologic treatment orders (odds ratio [OR] 0.74 for most disadvantaged, P < .001) and received fewer invasive therapies (0.92, P = .018). Individual-level characteristics correlating with lower rates of treatment orders were female sex, Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander race (OR 0.50, P < .001), Hispanic ethnicity (OR 0.77, P < .001), single or unmarried status (OR 0.69, P < .001), and no insurance or self-pay (OR 0.07, P < .001). ConclusionNeighborhood and individual sociodemographic variables associated with treatment orders for LBP with Area Deprivation Index, sex, race or ethnicity, insurance, and marital status associating with receipt of any treatment, as well as more invasive image-guided interventions and surgery.

Efficacy of Acupuncture in Chronic Low Back Pain Treatment: A Literature Review

Aims: To evaluate the effects of the use of acupuncture as a treatment of chronic low back pain.&#x0D; Methodology: This study follows the integrative methodology of literature review, seeking articles published on PubMed, using keywords from Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) to form the search Formula: Acupuncture AND "low back pain". Inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials published between 2018 and 2023, with free full text available in english or portuguese. The exclusion criteria was not answering this review’s orienting question. &#x0D; Results: Several studies analyzed the efficacy of different acupuncture and electroacupuncture approaches in the treatment of chronic low back pain. One study highlighted invasive laser acupuncture with different wavelengths, revealing improvements in pain and disability scales after 4 weeks. Another research compared electroacupuncture at various frequencies, observing similar reductions in pain between the groups. Combined acupuncture (hands and ear) was more effective than usual medical treatment, showing greater reduction in pain and cure rate. Both electroacupuncture and manual acupuncture also demonstrated efficacy in reducing pain intensity and quality. Acupuncture with embedded wires stood out, showing positive and rapid results in chronic low back pain. Another study revealed that both electroacupuncture and a placebo had positive impacts on pain intensity.&#x0D; Conclusion: Even though there are multiple forms of acupuncture used throughout the studies, and even those that appear on multiple studies are done differently on those appearances, all are used as a way to reduce CLBP. In that sense, the positive effects from using traditional acupuncture or some different form of acupuncture as a treatment for CLBP is highlighted by the results from the studies that were a part of this review.

Are systemic steroids effective for treatment of acute low back pain in adults?

Are systemic steroids effective for treatment of acute low back pain in adults?

Paralumbar Spine Disease as a Cause of Low Back Pain in Older Adults.

Introduction Low back pain (LBP) is a major contributor to decreases in the ability to perform activities of daily living (ADL) in older adults. Paralumbar spine disease (PLSD) is a common cause of LBP. We aimed to investigate the causes of LBP, including PLSD, among older adults. Methods Among 744 consecutive patients with LBP, 75 patients (10.1%) aged >80 years (25 males and 50 females) were included. The average patient age was 83.9 years. All patients were evaluated using lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and radiography to diagnose the causes of LBP. PLSD was diagnosed based on clinical symptoms, palpation, and the effects of the block. Results Eleven patients (11/75, 14.7%) had acute osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Twenty-eight of the remaining 64 patients exhibited decreased LBP with oral medication, and six (6/75, 8.0%) exhibited lumbar spinal canal stenosis on MRI. PLSD was suspected in 19 of the remaining 30 cases based on clinical symptoms and palpation. Blocks were effective in 16 patients with PLSD, which involved superior cluneal nerve entrapment (SCN-E) in eight patients (10.7%), middle cluneal nerve entrapment (MCN-E) in nine patients (12.0%), sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain in five patients (6.7%), and gluteus medius muscle (GMeM) pain in three patients (4.0%). The average numerical rating scale (NRS) scores for pain changed from 7.5 ± 1.5 before treatment to 1.3 ± 0.9 at discharge (p < 0.05). Conclusion Osteoporotic acute vertebral fracture (14.7%) was identified as the cause of LBP in older adults. Block therapy for PLSD may aid in the diagnosis and treatment of non-specific LBP.

ChatGPT for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Low Back Pain: Comment.

ChatGPT for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Low Back Pain: Comment.

Conditioned Medium of Intervertebral Disc Cells Inhibits Osteo-Genesis on Autologous Bone-Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stromal Cells and Osteoblasts.

Low back pain (LBP) is associated with the degeneration of human intervertebral discs (IVDs). Despite progress in the treatment of LBP through spinal fusion, some cases still end in non-fusion after the removal of the affected IVD tissue. In this study, we investigated the hypothesis that the remaining IVD cells secrete BMP inhibitors that are sufficient to inhibit osteogenesis in autologous osteoblasts (OBs) and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). A conditioned medium (CM) from primary human IVD cells in 3D alginate culture was co-cultured with seven donor-matched OB and MSCs. After ten days, osteogenesis was quantified at the transcript level using qPCR to measure the expression of bone-related genes and BMP antagonists, and at the protein level by alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity. Additionally, cells were evaluated histologically using alizarin red (ALZR) staining on Day 21. For judging ALP activity and osteogenesis, the Noggin expression in samples was investigated to uncover the potential causes. The results after culture with the CM showed significantly decreased ALP activity and the inhibition of the calcium deposit formation in alizarin red staining. Interestingly, no significant changes were found among most bone-related genes and BMP antagonists in OBs and MSCs. Noteworthy, Noggin was relatively expressed higher in human IVD cells than in autologous OBs or MSCs (relative to autologous OB, the average fold change was in 6.9, 10.0, and 6.3 in AFC, CEPC, and NPC, respectively; and relative to autologous MSC, the average fold change was 2.3, 3.4, and 3.2, in AFC, CEPC, and NPC, respectively). The upregulation of Noggin in residual human IVDs could potentially inhibit the osteogenesis of autologous OB and MSC, thus inhibiting the postoperative spinal fusion after discectomy surgery.

Mindfulness-based Interventions for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

This systematic review aimed to compile existing evidence examining the effects of mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) for chronic low back pain (CLBP). CLBP leads to millions of disabled individuals in the United States each year. Current pharmacologic treatments are only modestly effective and may present long-term safety issues. MBIs, which have an excellent safety profile, have been shown in prior studies to be effective in treating CLBP yet remained underutilized. Ovid/Medline, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), pilot RCTs, and single-arm studies that explored the effectiveness of MBIs in CLBP. Separate searches were conducted to identify trials that evaluated MBIs in reducing pain intensity in individuals with CLBP. A meta-analysis was then performed using R v3.2.2, Metafor package v 1.9-7. Eighteen studies used validated patient-reported pain outcome measures and were therefore included in the meta-analysis. The MBIs included mindfulness meditation, mindfulness-based stress reduction, mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, mindfulness-oriented recovery enhancement, acceptance and commitment therapy, dialectical behavioral therapy, meditation-cognitive behavioral therapy, mindfulness-based care for chronic pain, self-compassion course, and loving-kindness course. Pain intensity scores were reported using a numerical rating scale (0 to 10) or an equivalent scale. The meta-analysis revealed that MBIs have a beneficial effect on pain intensity with a large-sized effect in adults with CLBP. MBIs seem to be beneficial in reducing pain intensity. Although these results were informative, findings should be carefully interpreted due to the limited data the high variability in study methodologies, small sample sizes, inclusion of studies with high risk of bias, and reliance on pre-post treatment differences with no attention to maintenance of effects. More large-scale RCTs are needed to provide reliable effect size estimates for MBIs in persons with CLBP.

Contexts, behavioural mechanisms and outcomes to optimise therapeutic exercise prescription for persistent low back pain: a realist review

ObjectiveTherapeutic exercises are a core treatment for low back pain (LBP), but it is uncertain how rehabilitative exercise facilitates change in outcomes. Realist reviews explore how the context (C) of...

Nociceptive pain assessed by the PainDETECT questionnaire may predict response to opioid treatment for chronic low back pain

IntroductionThe pharmacological management of chronic low back pain (LBP) is complex. The World Health Organisation recommends a laddered approach to pain medication usage. The PainDETECT questionnaire distinguishes between neuropathic pain (NeP), nociceptive pain (NoP), and ambiguous pain. By elucidating the difference in medication efficacy between these groups, clinicians can provide a tailored treatment plan to manage patient's pain. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between pharmacological treatments, pain categorizations, and medication efficacy as reported by patients. MethodsA secondary retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database was conducted involving 318 consecutively recruited patients, aged 18 years and above, who completed PainDETECT, medication history and patient reported medication efficacy questionnaires. Medication history was categorized into four lines of treatment: first line (paracetamol ± non-prescribed anti-inflammatories), second line (prescribed anti-inflammatories), third line (anticonvulsants/neuromodulators) and fourth line (opioids). Medication efficacy was measured using a three-point Likert scale: effective (+2), somewhat effective (+1), no effect (0). FindingsThe study included 120, 50, 54 and 94 patients on first line, second line, third line and fourth line treatment, respectively. The NeP group had higher mean numerical rating scale (NRS) compared to NoP group in all four lines of treatment (8.10 ± 1.59 vs. 5.47± 2.27, p < 0.001, 8.64± 1.43 vs. 5.52± 1.86, p < 0.001, 8.00± 1.07 vs. 6.37± 2.39, p < 0.01, and 8.05± 1.73 vs. 7.2± 1.29, p < 0.05). When confounding for severity of LBP as measured by NRS, the distribution of medication efficacy significantly differed amongst the NeP, ambiguous and NoP groups in patients undergoing fourth line pharmacological treatment (r2 = 8.623, p < 0.05). The NoP group exhibited significantly higher medication efficacy compared to the NeP group (U = 14.038, p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in medication efficacy across the pain classifications for first, second- and third-line treatment. InterpretationOpioids was the only line of treatment more effective in targeting NoP, as determined by the PainDETECT questionnaire, compared to NeP. This pioneering study illustrates the complex nature of pharmacological management for chronic LBP. It underscores the importance of tailoring pharmacological treatment plans to fit individual pain profiles and expectations instead of adopting a blanket approach to pain management.

NSAIDS versus electro-acupuncture in management of low back pain in patients with lumbar spondylosis: a comparative cohort study

Background: Low back pain in lumbar spondylosis remains one of the most prevalent conditions, imposing a significant socio-economical burden. Objectives: To compare the effectiveness of low back pain treatment between NSAIDS and electro-acupuncture combined with infrared light (TCM) in patients with lumbar spondylosis. Materials and methods: We conducted a non-randomized prospective cohort study on lumbar spondylosis patients who had low back pain treated with either methods: NSAIDS or electro-acupuncture combined with infrared light therapy. Results: 75 patients were included, with a mean age of 53.39 ± 10.61 years. After 8 weeks of treatment, VAS scores decreased significantly from 7.5 ± 0.6 to 2.85 ± 0.4, p-value &lt; 0.05 in NSAIDS group and from 5.8 ± 0.9 to 2.7 ± 0.6, p-value &lt; 0.05 in TCM group. Schober index significantly increased over time (NSAIDS group from 10.36 ± 0.5 to 13.48 ± 0.7, TCM group from 10.88±0,8 to 13.61 ± 0.7, both with p-values &lt; 0.05), whereas ODI score in both groups decreased (NSAIDS group from 37.4 ± 5.5 to 22.2 ± 5.5, TCM group from 28.68 ± 5.4 to 15.13 ± 6.4, with p-values &lt; 0.05). The magnitude of improvement in VAS scores, Schober index, and ODI scores were more profound in NSAIDS group, with p-values &lt; 0.05. Side effect associated with TCM treatment was seen in 8% of cases with pain at acupunture sites. Meanwhile in NSAIDS group, dyspepsia and flatulence were fairly common, at 24%. Conclusions: The use of NSAIDs in the management of low back pain in lumbar spondylosis patients is associated with better outcomes compared to TCM, with a trade-off for a higher risk of treatment-related side effects. Key words: NSAIDS, electro-acupuncture, infrared light, low back pain, lumbar spondylosis

Modern possibilities of therapy of nonspecific pain in the lower back

Aim. To evaluate the effectiveness of combination therapy for low back pain (LBP) associated with spinal osteoarthritis (OA) using the Symptomatic Slow Acting Drugs for OsteoArthritis (SYSADOA) group drug Ambene® Bio.Materials and methods. The study included 30 patients with LBP aged 40 to 65 years. Various scales and questionnaires were used to assess the patients’ condition. All patients received Ambene® Bio 2.0 ml intramuscularly every other day for a total course of 10 injections. Some patients with severe pain continued to receive previously prescribed non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). After completing the course of treatment with Ambene® Bio, the overall effect of the therapy, changes in individual need for NSAIDs and the presence of adverse events were assessed.Results. All patients sought medical care due to exacerbation of chronic LBP. X-ray examination of the lumbosacral spine revealed degenerative-dystrophic changes in the vertebral-motor segments of the lumbar spine in all patients and in some patients – in the sacroiliac joints. The treatment showed positive dynamics in 27 (90 %) patients in the form of pain reduction not only in the lower back but also in peripheral joints. Of the 13 patients initially receiving NSAIDs, 7 (53.8 %) reduced the daily dose of the drug, and 3 (23.1 %) were able to stop taking NSAIDs. In 3 (23.1 %) cases, the initial NSAID dosage remained unchanged. Monotherapy with Ambene® Bio was received by 17 (56.7 %) patients. All patients expressed satisfaction with the treatment, of which 18 (60 %) rated the result as “excellent”, 7 (23.4 %) as “good” and 5 (16.6 %) as “satisfactory”.Conclusion. In all patients, therapy with Ambene® Bio, both in mono mode and in in combination with NSAIDs, had a positive effect, which was expressed in the reduction of the intensity of LBP on visual analog scale, improvement of peripheral joint function. In 7 (23.3 %) patients pain reduction was observed after the second injection of the drug (“the effect of the first dose”). In other cases the pain regressed later, but also within the course of treatment. All patients showed high adherence to therapy, which was explained by the rapid onset of the effect. The results of the study allow us to recommend Ambene® Bio for the treatment of LBP associated with spinal OA and within generalized OA, including patients with comorbid conditions.

Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and meditation in the treatment of persistent low back pain: Interventional Study

Objective: To compare the effect of both CBT and Meditation in chronic lower back pain patients.&#x0D; Method: Participants fulfilling the exclusion and inclusion criteria and who are between the age group of 35-50 years with CLBP were included. Numerical pain rating scale and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) was used for the participant selection. The participants were further divided into three groups and 4-week intervention of conventional physiotherapeutic exercise, meditation and CBT, was given to the participants. Numerical Pain Rating Scale and Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire were used as outcome measures.&#x0D; Results: 40 chronic back pain patients were enrolled and randomized. All enrolled participants completed baseline tests, providing cross-sectional data for this study. Simple randomization allocated 14 patients to the control group and 13 patients each to Experimental Group 1 and Experimental Group 2. Significant within-group improvements occurred on the Numerical Rating Scale and Oswestry scores between baseline and final visits for all groups. However, the experimental groups showed significantly greater decreases in pain intensity versus controls, evidenced by reduced mean Numerical Rating Scale and Oswestry scores at follow-up. One-way ANOVA and Welch tests revealed significantly reduced Numerical Rating Scale and Oswestry scores after treatment across groups. Both tests yielded statistically significant p-values &lt;0.01.&#x0D; Conclusion: The findings show that meditation and cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) are beneficial in reducing pain. As a result, for patients with persistent low back pain, taking into consideration these two treatment techniques is critical.&#x0D; Keywords: Cognitive Behavioural Therapy, Chronic Pain, Oswestry Questionnaire

Performance of ChatGPT on NASS Clinical Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Low Back Pain: A Comparison Study.

Comparative analysis. To evaluate Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT's) ability to predict appropriate clinical recommendations based on the most recent clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of low back pain. Low back pain is a very common and often debilitating condition that affects many people globally. ChatGPT is an artificial intelligence model that may be able to generate recommendations for low back pain. Using the North American Spine Society Evidence-Based Clinical Guidelines as the gold standard, 82 clinical questions relating to low back pain were entered into ChatGPT (GPT-3.5) independently. For each question, we recorded ChatGPT's answer, then used a point-answer system-the point being the guideline recommendation and the answer being ChatGPT's response-and asked ChatGPT if the point was mentioned in the answer to assess for accuracy. This response accuracy was repeated with one caveat-a prior prompt is given in ChatGPT to answer as an experienced orthopedic surgeon-for each question by guideline category. A two-sample proportion z test was used to assess any differences between the preprompt and postprompt scenarios with alpha=0.05. ChatGPT's response was accurate 65% (72% postprompt, P =0.41) for guidelines with clinical recommendations, 46% (58% postprompt, P =0.11) for guidelines with insufficient or conflicting data, and 49% (16% postprompt, P =0.003*) for guidelines with no adequate study to address the clinical question. For guidelines with insufficient or conflicting data, 44% (25% postprompt, P =0.01*) of ChatGPT responses wrongly suggested that sufficient evidence existed. ChatGPT was able to produce a sufficient clinical guideline recommendation for low back pain, with overall improvements if initially prompted. However, it tended to wrongly suggest evidence and often failed to mention, especially postprompt, when there is not enough evidence to adequately give an accurate recommendation.

Effects of strength training program in the treatment of chronic non-specific low back pain

Low back pain is defined as any pain that occurs between the last costal arch and the lower gluteal fold, and may have different intensities and durations, being considered chronic if it lasts for more than 12 weeks, becoming non-specific if its cause is not identified, compromising the quality of life of affected individuals. Currently, Strength Training (TF) has been included in the treatment of chronic non-specific low back pain, in order to improve the condition of people suffering from this condition. Thus, the objective of this research was to verify the impact of PT on the treatment of low back pain, highlighting the main aspects based on the inclusion of this practice in everyday life, showing the benefits arising from this method. For the present study, a review of scientific articles was carried out using the PubMed, Scielo and Google Scholar databases to complement information on low back pain and PD. Several evidences were found that positively contribute to the improvement of low back pain with the use of PT in pain conditions, increased functional capacity, improvement in activities of daily living (ADL), gain in muscular resistance, strength and hypertrophy, in addition to individuals showing themselves more active. It is concluded that TF proved to be effective in the treatment of non-specific chronic low back pain, improving its symptoms such as pain and disability, however, if applied by an unqualified professional and incorrectly, it can be harmful to health.

Investigating concurrent validity of inertial sensors to evaluate multiplanar spine movement

Inertial measurement units (IMUs) offer a portable and inexpensive alternative to traditional optical motion capture systems, and have potential to support clinical diagnosis and treatment of low back pain; however, due to a lack of confidence regarding the validity of IMU-derived metrics, their uptake and acceptance remain a challenge. The objective of this work was to assess the concurrent validity of the Xsens DOT IMUs for tracking multiplanar spine movement, and to evaluate concurrent validity and reliability for estimating clinically relevant metrics relative to gold-standard optical motion capture equipment. Ten healthy controls performed spine range of motion (ROM) tasks, while data were simultaneously tracked from IMUs and optical marker clusters placed over the C7, T12, and S1 vertebrae. Root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC2,1) were calculated to assess validity and reliability of absolute (abs; C7, T12, and S1 sensors) and relative joint (rel; intersegmental thoracic, lumbar, and total) motion. Overall RMSEabs = 1.33°, MAEabs = 0.74° ± 0.69, and ICC2,1,abs = 0.953 across all movements, sensors, and planes. Results were slightly better for uniplanar movements when evaluating the primary rotation axis (prim) absolute ROM (MAEabs,prim = 0.56° ± 0.49; ICC2,1,abs,prim = 0.999). Similarly, when evaluating relative intersegmental motion, overall RMSErel = 2.39°, MAErel = 1.10° ± 0.96, and ICC2,1,rel = 0.950, and relative primary rotation axis achieved MAErel,prim = 0.87° ± 0.77, and ICC2,1,rel,prim = 0.994. Findings from this study suggest that these IMUs can be considered valid for tracking multiplanar spine movement, and may be used to objectively assess spine movement and neuromuscular control in clinics.

Stimulating Superior Cluneal Nerves via Peripheral Nerve Stimulation as a Treatment for Chronic Low Back Pain

Stimulating Superior Cluneal Nerves via Peripheral Nerve Stimulation as a Treatment for Chronic Low Back Pain