Treatment Of Excessive Daytime Sleepiness Research Articles

Pitolisant 40 mg for excessive daytime sleepiness in obstructive sleep apnea patients treated or not by CPAP: Randomised phase 3 study.

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) syndrome commonly leads to excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS). Pitolisant, a selective histamine-3 receptor antagonist, is efficacious at doses up to 20 mg once daily in OSA treated or not with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). We assessed the efficacy and safety of pitolisant at doses up to 40 mg once daily in patients with moderate to severe OSA treated or not with CPAP therapy. In this phase 3, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial, patients with OSA were assigned 2:1 to receive pitolisant (according to an individual up-titration scheme, 10, 20 or 40 mg once daily) or placebo for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was a change in the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score from baseline to week 12. Secondary endpoints included a change in reaction time using the Oxford Sleep Resistance test (OSleR), Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C), and Patient's Global Opinion of the Effect (PGOE) of study treatment. Overall, 361 patients (mean age 52.4 years, 77.3% male; mean apnea-hypopnea index [AHI] 27.0 events/h) were randomised to receive pitolisant (n = 242; 50% received CPAP) or placebo (n = 119; 48.7% CPAP). After the dose-adjustment phase (week 3), 88.8% of patients received pitolisant 40 mg. Compared with placebo, pitolisant produced a significant reduction in the ESS score at week 12 (least square mean difference -2.6 (95% CI: -3.4; -1.8; p < 0.001)) irrespective of CPAP use; and improved the reaction time on OSleR, CGI-C, and PGOE at week 12. Pitolisant was well tolerated; no new safety signals were identified. In conclusion, pitolisant up to 40 mg once daily was an effective treatment for EDS in patients with moderate to severe OSA irrespective of CPAP use.

Comparison of the effectiveness of modafinil and methylphenidate in treatment of excessive daytime sleepiness in patients with Parkinson's disease.

Background: A large percentage of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) suffer from excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS). This study aims to compare the effectiveness of modafinil and methylphenidate on EDS and side effects. Methods: Fifty nine patients with PD and EDS [Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) more than 9] were recruited in a double-blind placebo controlled trial. Twenty-two patients received modafinil 200 mg daily, twenty-six patients received methylphenidate 10 mg daily, and 11 patients received placebo for 6 weeks. Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and ESS were filled out at baseline and 6 weeks later. Results: There was no significant difference in demographics, PSQI, and ESS variables at baseline. The mean of ESS scores decreased significantly in modafinil (17.36 ± 5.05 vs. 10.55 ± 4.62, P < 0.001) and methylphenidate (16.27 ± 5.40 vs. 12.23 ± 6.28, P < 0.001) groups after 6-week trial, compared with control group (14.27 ± 4.49 vs. 14.09 ± 4.46, P = 0.710). The effectiveness of modafinil and methylphenidate on improving daytime sleepiness and night sleep of patients was not significantly different. Conclusion: Both modafinil and methylphenidate were effective drugs in improving EDS and quality of sleep without significant difference in efficiency and side effects.

Weight Loss With Once-nightly Sodium Oxybate for the Treatment of Narcolepsy: Analysis From the Phase III Randomized study Evaluating the efficacy and SafeTy of a ONce nightly formulation of sodium oxybate (REST-ON) Trial

Individuals with narcolepsy are more likely to be obese than the general population. Changes in weight-related measures with extended-release, once-nightly sodium oxybate (ON-SXB) and characteristics of participants with ≥5% weight loss were assessed in a Randomized study Evaluating the efficacy and SafeTy of a ONce nightly formulation of sodium oxybate (REST-ON) trial post hoc analysis. REST-ON (NCT02720744) was a Phase III, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, randomized clinical trial. Participants aged ≥16 years with narcolepsy type 1 (NT1) or NT2 received ON-SXB or placebo for 13 weeks (week 1, 4.5 g; weeks 2-3, 6 g; weeks 4-8, 7.5 g; and weeks 9-13, 9 g). Weight and body mass index were measured at baseline and study end. Weights were similar between groups at baseline (mean [SD]; ON-SXB, 81.2 [20.8] kg; N = 107 [NT1, n = 80; NT2, n = 27]; placebo, 82.1 [22.5] kg; N = 105 [NT1, n = 82; NT2, n = 23]). At week 13 (9 g), mean (SD) weight decreased 1.3 (3.6) kg with ON-SXB and increased 0.2 (2.6) kg with placebo; 17.8% (19/107; NT1, n = 14; NT2, n = 5) of participants receiving ON-SXB had ≥5% weight loss versus 3.8% receiving placebo (4/105; NT1, n = 3; NT2, n = 1; P = 0.001). At week 13, least squares mean (SE) body mass index change from baseline was ‒0.51 (0.13) kg/m2 with ON-SXB and 0.08 (0.13) kg/m2 with placebo (least squares mean difference [95% CI], -0.59 [-0.95 to -0.23] kg/m2; P = 0.001). Excessive daytime sleepiness improved for both groups with ON-SXB, the ≥5% weight-loss subgroup exhibited larger improvement in the Maintenance of Wakefulness Test and Epworth Sleepiness Scale versus the other subgroup (weight loss <5%, no change, or weight gain) (Maintenance of Wakefulness Test, P = 0.019; Epworth Sleepiness Scale score, P < 0.001). Narcolepsy is often associated with obesity, which may increase cardiometabolic risks. ON-SXB, an effective treatment for excessive daytime sleepiness and cataplexy, may be preferred in overweight or obese individuals to provide a more tailored treatment approach. NCT02720744.

1024 SURWEY: Treatment of Excessive Daytime Sleepiness with Solriamfetol: Initiation, Titration, and Outcomes

1024 SURWEY: Treatment of Excessive Daytime Sleepiness with Solriamfetol: Initiation, Titration, and Outcomes

A Review of Current and Future Pharmacologic Treatments for Narcolepsy

IntroductionNarcolepsy is a rare but disabling neurological disorder involving disruption of the sleep-wake cycle that is often under- or misdiagnosed (Barateau L, et al. J Sleep Res. 2022;31(4):e13631). It is characterized by a classical tetrad of excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS), cataplexy, hypnagogic hallucinations, and sleep paralysis. Narcolepsy is divided into 3 types: Narcolepsy Type 1 (NT1); Narcolepsy Type 2 (NT2); and Secondary Narcolepsy. The pathophysiology remains unclear but is primarily associated with loss of hypocretin (orexin) neurons involving autoimmune and genetic risk factors, particularly for NT1.ObjectivesTo review the currently available therapies for the treatment of narcolepsy.MethodsThe extant literature was reviewed and discussed in the context of clinical relevance.ResultsTreatment historically has included medications developed for the treatment of other conditions such as psychostimulants (methylphenidate, modafinil/armodafinil, pemoline) and antidepressants (SSRIs,TCAs). These agents are also associated with limiting side effects in practice. In more recent years a variety of specific treatments have been approved that act on diverse pathways. Pitolisant, a histamine H3 receptor inverse agonist, is approved for the treatment of EDS or cataplexy in adult patients with narcolepsy (and children&gt; 6 years in European Union) (Keam SJ.Paediatr Drugs. 2023;25(4):483-488). Solriamfetol, a dopamine and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (DNRI) is indicated to improve wakefulness in adult patients with EDS associated with narcolepsy or obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) (Winter Y, et al. Sleep Med. 2023;103:138-143). Sodium oxybate (SXB), a GABAB receptor agonist, is approved for the treatment of cataplexy associated with narcolepsy and (EDS) in patients 7 years or older (Bogan RK, et al. CNS Drugs. 2023;37(4):323-335). Current research focuses on on-peptide hypocretin receptor-2 agonists (Saitoh T, Sakurai T. Peptides. 2023;167:171051).ConclusionsDespite limited understanding of the pathophysiology of narcolepsy there have been substantial advances in the pharmacotherapy, including medications now approved for children. Early diagnosis and treatment are associated with better outcomes. In view of the chronic and disabling morbidity associated with narcolepsy further research and better access to appopriate medications is necessary.Disclosure of InterestNone Declared

Pitolisant-supported bridging during drug holidays to deal with tolerance to modafinil in patients with narcolepsy

Study objectivesModafinil is a common treatment for excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) in narcolepsy. The long-term use of modafinil can lead to tolerance with the loss of efficacy and the continuous increase of its dose. Pharmacological strategies to deal with the tolerance to modafinil are lacking. We investigated the efficacy and safety of pitolisant-supported bridging during drug holidays in patients with tolerance to modafinil. MethodsNarcolepsy patients on monotherapy with modafinil who developed symptoms of tolerance were eligible. The following alternating therapy regimen was established: Monday to Friday patients continued on modafinil whereas Saturday and Sunday they switched to pitolisant to “bridge” the EDS symptoms. Patients were assessed at baseline and after three months with the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) and the Ullanlinna Narcolepsy Scale (UNS). Health-related quality of life (HrQol) was evaluated by EuroQol5D. Adverse events were documented in the patients’ diaries. Results41 patients aged 30.9 ± 5.6 years were included. After three months of the alternating therapy regimen, the symptoms of tolerance decreased and the modafinil dose could be reduced by 41% (p < 0.01) resulting in better safety. The EDS improved on ESS (baseline: 18.2 ± 4.2, follow-up: 12.6 ± 4.0, p < 0.0001) and UNS (baseline: 25.8 ± 7.9, follow-up: 18.9 ± 5.9, p < 0.0001). The HrQol increased significantly. ConclusionPatients with tolerance to modafinil could benefit from pitolisant-supported bridging during drug holidays. This alternating pharmacological strategy proved to be safe and helped to reduce EDS and to decrease the modafinil dose. Further randomized controlled studies are required to evaluate the different strategies to deal with the tolerance to modafinil. Clinical trial registration numberClinical Trials.gov Identifier NCT05321355.

0051 Samelisant, a H3 Receptor Inverse Agonist for the Potential Treatment of Excessive Daytime Sleepiness in Parkinson’s Disease

Abstract Introduction Samelisant (SUVN-G3031) is a potent and selective histamine 3 receptor (H3R) inverse agonist with hH3 Ki of 8.7 nM. Samelisant exhibited desired pharmacokinetic properties and favorable brain penetration in rodents. Preclinical studies demonstrated samelisant produced wake promoting and anticataplectic effects in orexin knockout mice. Additionally samelisant modulated neurotransmitters like histamine in brain indicating neurochemical basis for wake promoting effects. Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) estimated to affect 20-50% of patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD). Although non-treated PD patients exhibit EDS and sleep attacks, it is often associated with use of dopamine (DA) agonists, especially the recent non-ergot DA D2/3 agonists. Samelisant is currently being evaluated in a Phase-2 study as monotherapy for the treatment of EDS in patients with narcolepsy with or without cataplexy (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04072380). Methods Hemiparkinsonism was induced in male Wistar rats by injecting 6-OHDA (12 µg/4 µL) unilaterally into the medial forebrain bundle, and telemetric device was implanted to monitor EEG, EMG and activity. Animals were allowed to recover for 3 weeks prior to initiating EEG recordings. Basal EEG was recorded for 1 hour prior to samelisant administration and EEG acquisition was continued for 6 hours post treatment. After a washout period of 1 week, rats were administered with the quinpirole (30 µg/kg, i.p.) followed by samelisant and EEG acquisition was continued for 6 hours. EEG recordings were processed for sleep stages using NeuroScore and sleep sign software (DSI, MN, USA). Results Hemiparkinsonian animals showed decrease in wake and increase in sleep time during dark phase. Treatment with samelisant (10 and 30 mg/kg, p.o.) produced significant increase in cumulative wake period during first 3 hours post treatment. Treatment with quinpirole in hemiparkinsonian rats produced decrease in wake and increase in sleep time. Treatment with samelisant produced dose- dependent increase in wake with decrease in REM and NREM periods in quinpirole treated hemiparkinsonian rats. Conclusion The results from current preclinical studies indicate that samelisant may have a potential utility for the treatment of excessive daytime sleepiness in PD patients. Support (if any)

0585 A four-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study of mazindol ER in the treatment of narcolepsy

Abstract Introduction Mazindol is the first partial orexin 2 receptor agonist and triple monoamine reuptake inhibitor in development for the treatment of narcolepsy. A novel extended release (ER) formulation was developed to allow once-daily dosing and may provide a differentiated treatment option. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04923594). Methods Study NLS-1021 was a Phase 2, four-week, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of mazindol ER (NLS-2) for the treatment of excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) or cataplexy in adults with narcolepsy type 1 (NT1) or type 2 (NT2). Efficacy, safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics were assessed. Adult subjects diagnosed with NT1 or NT2 and washed out of narcolepsy medications at baseline were randomized 1:1 to receive placebo or 2 mg mazindol ER once-daily for one week followed by 3 mg once-daily for three weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change from baseline at Week 4 in excessive daytime sleepiness using the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS). Secondary efficacy endpoints included improvement in weekly cataplexy attacks and overall disease severity as rated by the investigators (Clinician Global Impression of Severity; CGI-S) and patients (Patient Global Impression of Severity; PGI-S). Results Sixty-seven subjects were randomized (n = 33 NLS-2; 34 placebo). The baseline mean [SD] ESS score was 17.9 [2.97] in subjects receiving NLS-2 and 18.0 [3.05] in placebo. NLS-2 met the pre-specified primary endpoint, demonstrating a statistically significant improvement in EDS with a least-squares mean [SE] difference (NLS-2-placebo) of –3.6 [1.33] in the ESS total score at Week 4 (p = 0.0081). Observed mean change from baseline in ESS total score was –7.1 [5.6] for NLS-2 and –3.2 [5.3] for placebo. In NT1 subjects, baseline weekly number of cataplexy episodes was 14.1 [10.8] in subjects receiving NLS-2 (n=11) and 15.0 [10.2] in placebo (n=12). At Week 4, the weekly number of cataplexy episodes was reduced to 4.1 with NLS-2 and to 8.5 with placebo. NLS-2 was generally safe and well-tolerated with no severe or serious adverse events or discontinuations due to adverse events. Conclusion In subjects with narcolepsy, NLS-2 significantly improved EDS and the number of cataplexy attacks compared with placebo. Support (if any) NLS Pharmaceutics

0909 Pitolisant Pregnancy Registry: An Observational Study of the Safety of Pitolisant Exposure in Pregnant Women and Their Offspring

Abstract Introduction WAKIX (pitolisant) is a potent and highly selective histamine 3 receptor antagonist/inverse agonist approved for the treatment of excessive daytime sleepiness or cataplexy in adult patients with narcolepsy. The safety of pitolisant in pregnant women has not been established. Available case reports from clinical trials and postmarketing experience have not demonstrated a drug-associated risk of major birth defects, miscarriage, or adverse maternal or fetal outcomes. The registry is a prospective, observational cohort study designed to evaluate the association between pitolisant exposure during pregnancy and subsequent maternal, fetal, and infant outcomes. Methods The primary study population consists of 3 cohorts: pregnant women with a diagnosis of narcolepsy who are exposed to pitolisant during pregnancy, pregnant women with narcolepsy who are unexposed to pitolisant but exposed to comparator products during pregnancy, and pregnant women with narcolepsy who are neither exposed to pitolisant nor comparator products. Comparator products include modafinil, armodafinil, sodium oxybate, oxybate mixed salts, solriamfetol, methylphenidate, and amphetamines. Outcomes of interest include major congenital malformation (primary outcome), minor congenital malformation, pre-eclampsia, eclampsia, spontaneous abortion, stillbirth, elective termination, small for gestational age, preterm birth, postnatal growth deficiency, and infant developmental deficiency. Data are collected from enrolled pregnant women and healthcare providers involved in their care or the care of their infants, if applicable. Only data that are routinely documented in patients' medical records during usual care are collected. Participation in the registry is voluntary and participants may withdraw their consent to participate at any time. The registry design follows current FDA guidance for designing and implementing pregnancy exposure registries. Results The registry was initiated in May 2021. Presently, data are insufficient to assess an association between pitolisant exposure and any endpoint of interest. Study completion is planned in 2030. Conclusion Healthcare providers are encouraged to discuss this voluntary pregnancy registry with their eligible patients and assist women who are interested in enrolling. The study is registered on Clinicaltrials.gov (ID# NCT05536011). Support (if any) This study is sponsored by Harmony Biosciences LLC.

0609 Samelisant, Histamine 3 Receptor Agonist for the Potential Treatment of Excessive Daytime Sleepiness in Patients with Narcolepsy

Abstract Introduction Samelisant (SUVN-G3031) is a potent and selective histamine 3 receptor inverse agonist. In orexin knockout mice, samelisant produced wake-promoting and anticataplectic effects suggesting its potential therapeutic utility in the treatment of narcolepsy. Safety and tolerability studies in animals and healthy human volunteers suggested a favorable risk/benefit profile for samelisant. Methods Samelisant is currently being evaluated in a double blind, Phase-2 proof of concept study in USA and Canada for narcolepsy with or without cataplexy (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04072380). The study is recruiting subjects diagnosed with narcolepsy as per ICSD-3 criteria, aged between 18 to 65 years with an Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score of ≥12 and mean Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT) time of &amp;lt; 12 min. A total of 171 subjects are expected to be randomized into 3 treatment arms (placebo, samelisant 2 mg and samelisant 4 mg) in 1:1:1 ratio. Each subject will receive either placebo or study drug once daily for 2 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint is change in MWT score from baseline to week 2. Key secondary endpoint is change in ESS from baseline to week 2. Safety will be monitored throughout the study by medical monitor and by data safety monitoring committee. As the study is still recruiting, demographics and baseline characteristic data for the currently enrolled subjects is summarized descriptively. Since the study is blinded, a breakdown of baseline characteristics by treatment group will not be available until after completion. Results At the data cutoff date of Nov 30, 2022, a total of 155 subjects were randomized in the study. The median age of subjects was 30 years (range: 18-57 years) with mean BMI of 28.5 kg/m2 (range: 18.3- 43.9 kg/m2). Overall, 57% subjects were of narcolepsy type-1, 71% were female and 71% were Caucasian. Mean (SD) baseline values of MWT and ESS scores were 6.1 (4.4) and 17.2 (2.8), respectively. Conclusion Baseline characteristics are consistent with the general narcolepsy population. The study is currently enrolling subjects with narcolepsy and the data readout is expected in Q2 2023. Support (if any)

0895 Pharmacokinetics of pitolisant in breast milk and serum of healthy lactating women

Abstract Introduction Pitolisant is a potent and highly selective histamine-3-receptor antagonist/inverse agonist approved for the treatment of excessive daytime sleepiness or cataplexy in adult patients with narcolepsy. A phase 4, open-label study was conducted to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) of pitolisant and its major metabolite, BP1.3484, in breast milk and serum following a single dose of pitolisant administered to healthy lactating women. Methods In this study, eight healthy lactating women (aged 22-42 years) who met eligibility criteria were enrolled and received a single oral dose of pitolisant (35.6 mg). Serial breast milk samples were collected at pre-dose on Day 1 and at various intervals through 24 hours post-dose. Serial blood samples for PK analyses were collected at pre-dose and through 120 hours post-dose. Since the total infant dosage calculated from single dose data may be under-estimated, steady-state serum concentrations were predicted using noncompartmental methods and then multiplied by the 24-hour breast milk:serum ratio (AUCBM/S) to estimate a more appropriate total infant dose. Results Pitolisant was excreted in breast milk, with mean CmaxBM/S and AUCBM/S ratios of 85.2% and 123%, respectively. Concentrations of pitolisant in breast milk were only slightly lower than concentrations in serum. However, since the volume of breast milk was low, the percentage of the maternal dose expressed in breast milk was very low. Steady state calculations for a 6-month-old infant resulted in a mean total infant dosage of 0.005 mg/kg/day (SD 0.002), which is 1.15% of the maternal dose. For BP1.3484, maternal exposure and the calculated mean daily infant exposure were much lower than pitolisant. All subjects completed the study as planned. Five subjects (62.5%) reported a total of 8 treatment-emergent adverse events, which were mild in severity and resolved by end of the study. Conclusion Pitolisant is present in human milk, but the mean daily infant dosage in a 6-month-old infant after steady-state dosing of pitolisant in healthy lactating women was estimated to be very low. Overall, a single oral dose of pitolisant 35.6 mg was well-tolerated in healthy lactating women. Support (if any) The study was sponsored by Harmony Biosciences LLC.

0560 Solriamfetol for Excessive Sleepiness in Narcolepsy and Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Effect Sizes and Numbers Needed to Treat or Harm

Abstract Introduction Solriamfetol (Sunosi®), a dopamine/norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor that has been shown to activate TAAR1, is approved (US and EU) to treat excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) in adults with narcolepsy (75-150mg/day) or obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) (37.5-150mg/day). Effect size, number needed to treat (NNT) and number needed to harm (NNH) are statistical representations of efficacy and tolerability that clinicians may find helpful in guiding treatment decisions. This analysis characterized these statistical parameters from two registrational studies. Methods We conducted a post-hoc analysis of data from two phase 3 studies in adults with excessive daytime sleepiness associated with narcolepsy (TONES 2) or OSA (TONES 3). Effect size compared to placebo, NNT, and NNH were calculated based on previously published endpoints, post-hoc analyses, and adverse events. Results On the Maintenance of Wakefulness Test, effect size compared to placebo (Cohen’s d) was 0.29, 0.82, and 1.13 for 75mg, 150mg, and 300mg doses of solriamfetol in TONES 2 and 0.46, 0.89, 1.08, and 1.28 for 37.5mg, 75mg, 150mg, and 300mg in TONES 3. On the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), d was 0.47, 0.80, and 1.02 for 75mg, 150mg, and 300mg in TONES 2, and 0.42, 0.37, 0.99, and 1.04 for 37.5mg, 75mg, 150mg, and 300mg doses in TONES 3. NNT for patients achieving an ESS ≤10 was 7, 5, and 3 for 75mg, 150mg, and 300mg doses in TONES 2 and 8, 6, 4, and 3 for 37.5mg, 75mg, 150mg, and 300mg doses in TONES 3. On the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIc), NNT was 4, 3, and 3 for 75mg,150mg, and 300mg doses in TONES 2 and 16, 5, 3, and 3 for 37.5, 75mg, 150mg, and 300mg in TONES 3. Similar NNT were found for the Clinician Global Impression of Change as for the PGIc. In both TONES 2 and TONES 3, NNH pooled across doses for adverse events occurring in ≥5% of patients and greater than placebo were all &amp;gt;10, with the exception of headache in TONES 2 (NNH=6). Conclusion This post-hoc analysis demonstrates favorable effect size, NNT, and NNH values for solriamfetol in the treatment of EDS associated with narcolepsy and OSA. Support (if any) Axsome Therapeutics

Safety and pharmacodynamics of a single infusion of danavorexton in adults with obstructive sleep apnea experiencing excessive daytime sleepiness despite adequate use of CPAP

BackgroundSleep disruptions experienced by patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) can lead to excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) and significantly impact patients’ quality of life. EDS may persist despite use of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy. Small molecules that target the orexin system, which has a known role in sleep-wake regulation, show therapeutic potential for the treatment of EDS in patients with hypersomnia. This randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 1b study aimed to investigate the safety of danavorexton, a small-molecule orexin-2 receptor agonist, and its effects on residual EDS in patients with OSA. MethodsAdults with OSA aged 18–67 years with adequate CPAP use were randomized to one of six treatment sequences of single IV infusions of danavorexton 44 mg, danavorexton 112 mg, and placebo. Adverse events were monitored throughout the study. Pharmacodynamic assessments included maintenance of wakefulness test (MWT), Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS), and the psychomotor vigilance test (PVT). Results and conclusionAmong 25 randomized patients, 16 (64.0%) had treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and 12 (48.0%) had TEAEs considered related to treatment, all mild or moderate. Seven patients (28.0%) had urinary TEAEs: three, seven, and none while taking danavorexton 44 mg, danavorexton 112 mg, and placebo, respectively. There were no deaths or TEAEs leading to discontinuation. Improvements in mean MWT, KSS, and PVT scores were observed with danavorexton 44 mg and 112 mg vs placebo. These findings show that danavorexton can improve subjective and objective measures of EDS in patients with OSA and residual EDS despite adequate CPAP use.

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Multiple Wake-Promoting Agents for the Treatment of Excessive Daytime Sleepiness in Narcolepsy: A Network Meta-Analysis.

Narcolepsy is a rare debilitating disorder for which multiple novel pharmacological options have been approved as treatment for the past few years. The current study systematically updates the comparative efficacy and detailed safety analysis of approved wake-promoting agents in narcolepsy. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were searched for diagnosed narcolepsy with approved interventions. Efficacy outcomes included the Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT), Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C), and Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C). Safety outcomes including overall adverse event (AE) risk were measured. The study was registered at PROSPERO (CRD 42022334915). The final analysis included 17 RCTs with five drug treatments: modafinil/armodafinil, sodium oxybate, pitolisant, solriamfetol, and lower-sodium oxybate (LXB). For efficacy measures, interventions included in each outcome were effective compared with placebo. Furthermore, the magnitude of solriamfetol effect on MWT (9.11 minutes; 95% CI=7.05-11.16), ESS (-4.79; 95% CI=-6.56 to -3.01), and PGI-C (9.39; 95% CI= 2.37-37.19), and LXB effect on CGI-C (9.67; 95% CI=2.73-34.26) was greater than that of other treatments included in each outcome compared with placebo. For safety measures, all interventions had an acceptable safety profile with LXB having least risk for overall AEs (0.56; 95% CI=0.20-1.53), serious AEs (0.33; 95% CI=0.09-1.20), AEs leading to treatment discontinuation (0.11; 95% CI=0.01-2.04), and all-cause discontinuation (0.04; 95% CI=0.00-0.67) compared to placebo. Placebo had the lowest risk for exploratory AEs. All approved interventions were effective in controlling the symptoms of narcolepsy at varying degrees with an acceptable safety profile.

Preclinical Pharmacology of Solriamfetol: Potential Mechanisms for Wake Promotion

AbstractIntroductionSolriamfetol is a wake-promoting agent (WPA) approved for the treatment of excessive daytime sleepiness associated with narcolepsy and obstructive sleep apnea. The wake-promoting mechanism of solriamfetol may result from dopamine and norepinephrine reuptake inhibition. Preclinical pharmacology studies were conducted to further elucidate the molecular targets activated by solriamfetol and compare them to that of known WPAs and traditional stimulants.MethodsIn vitro binding and functional studies were conducted in a panel of cell lines or membrane preparations expressing transmembrane receptors and monoamine transporters to measure the activity of solriamfetol, comparator WPAs, and traditional stimulants. Electrophysiology studies were conducted in slice preparations from mouse ventral tegmental area (VTA). Studies to measure locomotor activity and wake-promoting effects were conducted in mice.ResultsIn vitro functional studies showed agonist activity of solriamfetol at human, mouse, and rat TAAR1 receptors. hTAAR1 EC50 values (10–16 μM) were within the clinically observed therapeutic solriamfetol plasma concentration range and overlapped with the observed DAT/NET inhibitory potencies of solriamfetol in vitro. TAAR1 agonist activity was unique to solriamfetol; neither the WPA modafinil nor the DAT/NET inhibitor bupropion had TAAR1 agonist activity. Solriamfetol (1–10 μM) dose-dependently inhibited the firing frequency of dopaminergic VTA neurons in mouse brain slices, similar to known TAAR1 agonists; however, these effects were inhibited by a D2 antagonist, suggesting a DAT-mediated effect. Unlike traditional stimulants, solriamfetol did not increase locomotor activity in naive mice, but inhibited the increase in locomotor activity in DAT knockout mice.ConclusionsPreclinical studies have identified agonist activity at the TAAR1 receptor and, possibly, lower potency agonist activity at 5-HT1A receptors as potential pharmacological targets for solriamfetol, in addition to its activity as a DAT/NET inhibitor. Given the current understanding of TAAR1 agonists as modulators of monoamine transmission with potential wake-promoting effects in multiple preclinical species, agonist activity at the hTAAR1 receptor may represent an additional pharmacological target underlying the wake-promoting effects for solriamfetol, in addition to its DNRI activity.FundingAxsome Therapeutics, Jazz Pharmaceuticals

Is obstructive sleep apnea a circadian rhythm disorder?

Obstructive sleep apnea is the most common sleep-related breathing disorder worldwide and remains underdiagnosed. Its multiple associated comorbidities contribute to a decreased quality of life and work performance as well as an increased risk of death. Standard treatment seems to have limited effects on cardiovascular and metabolic aspects of the disease, emphasising the need for early diagnosis and additional therapeutic approaches. Recent evidence suggests that the dysregulation of circadian rhythms, processes with endogenous rhythmicity that are adjusted to the environment through various cues, is involved in the pathogenesis of comorbidities. In patients with obstructive sleep apnea, altered circadian gene expression patterns have been demonstrated. Obstructive respiratory events may promote circadian dysregulation through the effects of sleep disturbance and intermittent hypoxia, with subsequent inflammation and disruption of neural and hormonal homeostasis. In this review, current knowledge on obstructive sleep apnea, circadian rhythm regulation, and circadian rhythm sleep disorders is summarised. Studies that connect obstructive sleep apnea to circadian rhythm abnormalities are critically evaluated. Furthermore, pathogenetic mechanisms that may underlie this association, most notably hypoxia signalling, are presented. A bidirectional relationship between obstructive sleep apnea and circadian rhythm dysregulation is proposed. Approaching obstructive sleep apnea as a circadian rhythm disorder may prove beneficial for the development of new, personalised diagnostic, therapeutic and prognostic tools. However, further studies are needed before the clinical approach to obstructive sleep apnea includes targeting the circadian system.

Expert consensus on clinical diagnosis and treatment of excessive daytime sleepiness

Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) afflicts more than 20% of the general population. It not only affects individuals' performance in many ways, but may even be life-threatening due to potential risks. Currently, there is no comprehensive diagnosis and treatment standard for EDS at home and abroad. To this end, the Chinese Sleep Research Society organized domestic experts in sleep medicine to develop this consensus based on the latest research on EDS. The current consensus elaborates on the definition, epidemiology, clinical manifestations, diagnostic approach, related etiology, evaluation, and treatment of EDS, aiming to provide comprehensive and standardized references and recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of EDS.

Pitolisant Hydrochloride (Wakix)

&#x0D; CADTH reimbursement reviews are comprehensive assessments of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, as well as patient and clinician perspectives, of a drug or drug class.&#x0D; The assessments inform non-binding recommendations that help guide the reimbursement decisions of Canada's federal, provincial, and territorial governments, with the exception of Quebec.&#x0D; This review assesses Pitolisant hydrochloride (Wakix), up to 40 mg daily, 5 mg and 20 mg tablets, oral.&#x0D; Indication: Treatment of excessive daytime sleepiness or cataplexy in adults with narcolepsy.&#x0D;

Approach to a sleepy child: Diagnosis and treatment of excessive daytime sleepiness in children and adolescents

The aim of this review is to give updated information to pediatric neurologists on the correct diagnostic approach and treatment of excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) in children and adolescents. Due to the change in the society habits, EDS is becoming an emerging problem for the health system. At the present there are few articles specifically devoted to the evaluation of EDS. EDS is often reported in several manuscripts as a side effect of other sleep disorders (obstructive sleep apnea, circadian disorders, etc.) or of the use of drugs or of the substance abuse or as a consequence of bad sleep habits and poor sleep hygiene. EDS, especially in children, may manifest with paradoxical symptoms like hyperactivity, inattention, and impulsiveness. However, common sign of EDS in children are the propensity to sleep longer than usual, the difficulty waking up in the morning, and falling asleep frequently during the day in monotonous situation. The diagnosis should include subjective (sleep diaries, questionnaires) and objective (polysomnography, multiple sleep latency test, etc.) instruments to avoid misdiagnosis. Narcolepsy is the most studied central disorder of hypersomnolence, and it is a predominantly pediatric disease with a peak age of onset in prepuberty but the diagnosis is often delayed especially in mild forms. The early and correct treatment of narcolepsy and of other form of EDS is extremely important since late and inappropriate treatments can affect the psychosocial development of the children and adolescents.

Pitolisant Hydrochloride (Wakix)

&#x0D; CADTH recommends that Wakix not be reimbursed by public drug plans for the treatment of excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) or cataplexy in adult patients with narcolepsy.&#x0D; It is still not known whether Wakix offers any therapeutic benefit over other treatments used for EDS or cataplexy. Two double-blind, randomized, controlled, comparative studies failed to show that Wakix was at least as good as modafinil for treating EDS and did not show any clinical benefit of Wakix over modafinil. One study focused on cataplexy, but this study was versus placebo and results were inconsistent for cataplexy outcomes across the studies.&#x0D; Based on the evidence, the expert committee could not conclude that Wakix met any of the needs that were identified as important to patients, including being more effective and reliable for controlling narcolepsy symptoms and to which patients would be less likely to develop tolerance.&#x0D;