Treatment Dropout Research Articles

Premature termination of the unified protocol for the transdiagnostic treatment of emotional disorders: The role of ambivalence towards change.

Ambivalence towards change is an expected, recurrent process in psychological change. However, the prolonged experience of ambivalence in psychotherapy contributes to client disengagement, which could result in treatment dropout. Considering the negative effects of premature termination of therapy and the convenience of the identification of clients who are at risk of dropping out before achieving good-outcome, the current study explored the predictive power of ambivalence for premature therapy termination using a multilevel time-backwards model (i.e., considering the session of the dropout as session zero and then modelling what occurred from the dropout until session 1). Participants included a total of 96 psychotherapy clients (38 dropouts) treated in a university-based clinic following the Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders. Multilevel modelling using a time-backwards model to analyse dropout data provided evidence of the predictive power of ambivalence evolution throughout treatment on the decision to prematurely discontinue treatment (p < .0001; R2 adj = .29). Specifically, good-outcome dropouts presented a decreasing ambivalence trend throughout treatment, whereas poor-outcome dropouts tended to experience the same levels of ambivalence before deciding to drop out (time × dropout; β11 = .64, p = .014). Additionally, poor-outcome dropouts presented higher levels of ambivalence (β01 = 9.92, p < .0001) in the last session. The results suggest that the pattern of client ambivalence towards change is a predictor of premature termination of therapy. Implications for clinical and research contexts are discussed.

Effect of patient characteristics on posttraumatic stress disorder treatment retention among veterans: A systematic review.

To identify baseline patient characteristics (i.e., demographic and psychological factors, military background) associated with better posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) treatment retention among veterans, we conducted a systematic review. After an electronic database search for studies of PTSD treatment in veterans, two reviewers independently screened the literature for eligibility, abstracted study-level information, and assessed risk of bias. As most studies used multivariate models to assess multiple potential predictors of retention simultaneously, the results were described narratively. The GRADE approach, adapted for prognostic literature, was used to assess the overall quality of evidence (QoE). In total, 19 studies reported in 25 publications met the inclusion criteria (n=6 good quality, n=9 fair quality, n=4 poor quality). Definitions of treatment completion and dropout varied, and some studies lumped different therapy approaches together. Older age and higher treatment expectations were associated with better retention (moderate QoE). In 5 of 6 studies, baseline PTSD severity was not associated with retention, and the remaining study reported an association between better retention and more severe PTSD symptoms; the presence of more co-occurring psychiatric disorders was associated with better retention (moderate QoE). QoE was low or insufficient to support conclusions for any other characteristics due to inconsistent results, imprecision, potential publication bias, possible study population overlap, study limitations, or lack of studies. More research is needed regarding the associations between modifiable factors (e.g., motivation, barriers, expectations) and retention, and consistent definitions of treatment completion and minimally adequate treatment should be adopted throughout the field.

Factors Causing Dropout From Treatment During the Ponseti Method of Clubfoot Management: The Caregivers’ Perspective

A retrospective comparative study was conducted, aiming to identify factors associated with dropout from clubfoot treatment by Ponseti method in low- and middle-income countries. A prospectively gathered database of patients who received treatment at a high-volume urban clubfoot clinic over 6 years was queried for dropouts. A “dropout” was identified as any child that had not had a visit within 3 weeks of casting, 4 weeks of tenotomy or 6 months of brace follow-up. The second part of the study was a telephonic interview with caregivers of the identified dropouts to ascertain their reasons for discontinuing treatment. Of the 965 patients treated during the study period, there were 155 (16.06%) dropouts—137 (88.38%) during bracing phase and 18 (11.62%) during casting phase. Age at presentation was significantly higher among the dropouts as compared to those who did not dropout (median 9.5 and 7 months for casting and bracing dropouts respectively versus 3.5 months for regular follow-ups, p < .001). No significant correlation was found between patient dropout and sex (p = .061), or laterality (p = .071). Thirty-seven caregivers (23.8%) could be contacted telephonically; including 6 casting and 31 bracing dropouts. The most commonly cited reason for dropout from treatment was lack of family support (75.7%), followed by distance to the clinic (59.5%) and unavailability of transport (54.1%). Sixteen caregivers (43.2%) dropped out on account of migration to another town/state. Maintenance of a meticulous registry with regular update of caregivers’ contact details, and interventions to mitigate the identified hurdles can help in reducing treatment dropouts.

Therapeutic Alliance: A Comparison Study between Adolescent Patients and Their Therapists.

The aim of this study was to examine the congruence of adolescent- and therapist-rated therapeutic alliance, and to explore which rating or combination of ratings would predict treatment outcome or premature termination. We also studied whether the alliance changes over the course of treatment and if the change is related to the outcome or dropout. This study comprised 58 adolescents clinically referred for psychotherapeutic interventions. The alliance (Working Alliance Inventory, patient/therapist ratings) and treatment outcomes (Beck Depression Inventory, Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation—Outcome Measure) were measured at baseline and at 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-ups. The alliance did not change significantly over the course of therapy, but adolescent and therapist ratings did not correlate. Low values in the early assessment of adolescent-rated alliance and discrepancy between the ratings were significant predictors of undesirable treatment outcome. Weak adolescent- or therapist-rated alliance later in treatment and change for the worse in adolescent-rated alliance was associated with treatment dropout. As adolescent-rated alliance predicts treatment outcome better than therapist-rated alliance, therapists should frequently use assessments of therapeutic relationship within the therapy and pay attention if the adolescent feels the alliance is weakening or his/her evaluation is contrary to the therapist’s.

Psychotherapy Dropout: Using the Adolescent Psychotherapy Q-Set to Explore the Early In-Session Process of Short-Term Psychodynamic Psychotherapy.

Research suggests that short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy (STPP) is an effective treatment for depression in adolescence, yet treatment dropout is a major concern and what leads to dropout is poorly understood. Whilst studies have begun to explore the role of patient and therapist variables, there is a dearth of research on the actual therapy process and investigation of the interaction between patient and therapist. This study aims to address this paucity through the utilisation of the Adolescent Psychotherapy Q-set (APQ) to examine the early treatment period. The sample includes 69 adolescents aged 16–18 years with major depressive disorder receiving STPP as part of the First Experimental Study of Transference Work–in Teenagers (FEST-IT) trial. Of these, 21 were identified as dropouts and were compared to completers on pre-treatment patient characteristics, symptomatology, functioning, and working alliance. APQ ratings available for an early session from 16 of these drop out cases were analysed to explore the patient-therapist interaction structure. Results from the Q-factor analysis revealed three distinct interaction structures that explained 54.3% of the total variance. The first described a process of mutual trust and collaboration, the second was characterised by patient resistance and emotional detachment, the third by a mismatch and incongruence between therapist and adolescent. Comparison between the three revealed interesting differences which taken together provide further evidence that the reasons why adolescents drop out of therapy vary and are multidimensional in nature.

Factors associated with the degree of glycemic deterioration among patients with type 2 diabetes who dropped out of diabetes care: A longitudinal analysis using medical claims and health checkup data in Japan.

ABSTRACTAims/IntroductionTo identify factors associated with worsening glycemic control after discontinuing diabetes care among patients with type 2 diabetes.Materials and MethodsThis retrospective cohort study combined medical claims and health checkup data between January 2005 and April 2018. Adult Japanese workers with type 2 diabetes who had dropped out from diabetes care for ≥4 months after receiving ≥18 months of non‐intermittent care and had health checkup information both before and after the dropout were included. Factors associated with changes in HbA1c during the dropout period were identified using multiple linear regression analyses and depicting restricted cubic spline (RCS) curves.ResultsA total of 1,125 patients (mean age: 51.2 years, baseline HbA1c: 6.8%, and number of males: 93.7%) whose follow‐up HbA1c increased to 7.6% after a mean 9.3‐month dropout period were included. Deterioration in HbA1c was associated with higher baseline HbA1c and sulfonylurea or insulin use. The RCS curves illustrated that patients without antidiabetic medication had small changes in HbA1c (+0.5% from a baseline HbA1c of 7.0%), whereas those using sulfonylureas or insulin had an approximately 2% or more increase in HbA1c even when maintaining reasonable glycemic control before dropping out.ConclusionsOverall in this study, glycemic control worsened during treatment interruptions among patients who were mainly male employees. However, changes in HbA1c greatly varied based on baseline HbA1c and antidiabetic medication type. Caring for patients at risk of worsening glycemic control due to treatment dropout, especially those using sulfonylurea and insulin, is imperative.

The Relationship Between Gambling Problems and the Five-Factor Model of Personality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objectives: The aim of the present meta-analysis was to synthesize results from the association between problem gambling (PG) and dimensions of the five factor model of personality and to identify potential moderators (gambling diagnosis: yes/no, comorbidity: yes/no and trait assessment: four or fewer items vs. five items or more) of these associations in meta-regressions.Methods: Searches were conducted in six databases; Medline, Web of Science, PsychInfo, Google Scholar, OpenGrey, and Cochrane Library (conducted on February, 22, 2021). Included studies: (1) reported a relationship between PG and at least one of the personality traits in the five-factor model, (2) contained information of zero-order correlations or sufficient data for such calculations, and (3) were original articles published in any European language. Case-studies, qualitative studies, and reviews were excluded. All articles were independently screened by two authors. Final agreement was reached through discussion or by consulting a third author. Risk of bias of the included studies was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Data were synthesized using a random effects model.Results: In total 28 studies, comprising 20,587 participants, were included. The correlations between PG and the traits were as follows: Neuroticism: 0.273 (95% CI = 0.182, 0.358), conscientiousness −0.296 (95% CI = −0.400, −0.185), agreeableness −0.163 (95% CI = −0.223, −0.101), openness −0.219 (95% CI = −0.308, −0.127), and extroversion −0.083 (95% CI = −0.120, −0.046). For all meta-analyses the between study heterogeneity was significant. Presence of gambling diagnosis was the only moderator that significantly explained between-study variance showing a more negative correlation to extroversion when participants had a gambling diagnosis compared to when this was not the case.Discussion: The results indicated some publication bias. Correcting for this by a trim-and-fill procedure showed however that the findings were consistent. Clinicians and researchers should be aware of the associations between personality traits and PG. Previous studies have for example showed neuroticism to be related to treatment relapse, low scores on conscientiousness to predict treatment drop-out and agreeableness to reduce risk of treatment drop-out.Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO (CRD42021237225).

Predicting and preventing dropout in research, assessment and treatment with refugees.

Refugees and asylum seekers are exposed to multiple burdensome experiences and suffer from ongoing post-migration stressors that are known to affect the physical and mental health. In psychological treatment offered to refugees and asylum seekers, dropout is an important challenge. The current practice-oriented review aims to provide for the first time knowledge on the prevalence, prediction and prevention of dropout in psychological treatment for refugees and asylum seekers. Due to the limited empirical evidence for this specific population, we synthesized refugee-specific research but also reviewed the existing evidence on dropout from treatment in general and specifically discuss how the findings can be adapted to refugee populations. The review integrates literature from online databases, grey literature, hand search and expert contacts. Prevalence rates of dropout from psychological treatment in Western samples are reported at about 20%. For refugees and asylum seekers, evidence from single efficacy trials showed considerable variability in dropout rates (0%-64.7%). Further, for refugees and asylum seekers, specific sociodemographic variables, high initial impairment, deviating expectations and perceptions of mental health and psychological treatment, as well as external barriers seem to be important predictors for dropout. To prevent dropout, it is important to develop and promote cultural competencies, adapt the treatment to refugee-specific needs and focus on role induction, preparation for treatment, fostering the therapeutic alliance and strengthening hope. Future specific research on dropout in treatment offered to refugees and asylum seekers is needed.

Forming a Doctor-Patient Alliance During COVID-19 to Enhance Treatment Outcomes for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.

Forming a Doctor-Patient Alliance During COVID-19 to Enhance Treatment Outcomes for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.

\u201cI\u2019m not alone, my story matters\u201d: Incarcerated women\u2019s perspectives on the impact and acceptability of group psychotherapy involving imaginal exposure to sexual assault memories

BackgroundAlthough it is clear that incarcerated women need access to effective therapies for trauma sequelae, some have argued that one of the most effective treatments – exposure therapy – should not be provided in carceral settings due to the presumed lack of safety and stability making such an intervention inappropriate. Group therapy, the typical mode of intervention in prisons, has also been presumed to be unacceptable for exposure-based processing due to assumptions that hearing others’ trauma narratives would be traumatizing and unhelpful to listeners. However, there is a lack of data to support either of the aforementioned assumptions. This study examined the acceptability of an exposure-based group therapy for women survivors of sexual violence who were currently incarcerated (N = 61) by asking women themselves about their experiences completing an exposure-based group therapy protocol (SHARE; SurvivorsHealing fromAbuse:Recovery throughExposure) while incarcerated. We assessed women’s reasons for enrolling in the group, satisfaction with various therapy components (e.g., exposure, skill-building) and the treatment overall, and experiences of both sharing and listening to trauma narratives using a feedback survey that included a mix of multiple-choice and open-ended questions. Treatment dropout was examined as an additional index of acceptability.ResultsTreatment completion was very high (88.8%). Nearly all women who completed the group reported that they would recommend it to other incarcerated women (96.7%, with the remaining 3.3% reporting “it depends”). Qualitative results revealed overwhelmingly positive feedback about the effect of the group and indicated that sharing and listening to trauma narratives in a group setting serve discrete but dually important functions. Specifically, women almost universally experienced listening to others’ trauma narratives (i.e., exposures) in the SHARE group context as helpful—making them feel less alone and normalizing their experiences. Sharing one’s own story primarily provided an emotional release and/or transformation (i.e., an intrapersonal rather than interpersonal function).ConclusionsOur findings challenge common concerns about the appropriateness of 1) prison as a context for trauma-focused treatments, including exposure and 2) sharing trauma narratives in a group setting. Unless empirical evidence demonstrating harm is uncovered, best practices for PTSD and other trauma-related sequelae—those recommended in reputable treatment guidelines and interventions like SHARE that incorporate components shown to be effective (e.g., cognitive challenging, exposure)—should be offered to incarcerated women as part of standard of care.

Disclosure processes as predictors of relationship outcomes among people in recovery from opioid use disorder: A longitudinal analysis

BackgroundPersonal disclosure of opioid use disorder (OUD) recovery can lead to relationship outcomes such as social support, which is associated with greater treatment retention, or stigma, which is associated with risk of treatment dropout. Although disclosure may have important impacts on the relationships and ensuing recovery trajectories of people with OUD, disclosure processes remain understudied in the context of OUD. MethodsGuided by the Disclosure Process Model, this longitudinal study explored the disclosure goals of people in treatment for OUD and examined associations between disclosure goals and relationship outcomes. Data were collected at baseline (N = 146) and three months later (n = 124) from participants who were in treatment for OUD and planning to disclose their OUD history and/or treatment to someone new. ResultsQualitative baseline data were analyzed to identify disclosure goals. Approach goals (i.e., reasons for disclosure) included support, honesty, amends, set an example, and logistics; avoidance goals (i.e., reasons against disclosure) included judgment, worry, and privacy. Quantitative data suggested that approach goals at baseline were associated with greater likelihood of disclosure within three months (OR=2.16, 95% CI=1.04–4.49) as well as with greater social support [B(SE)= 0.35(0.16), p = 0.03] and relationship closeness [B(SE)= 0.29(0.17), p = 0.01] following disclosures. In contrast, avoidance goals at baseline were associated with greater enacted stigma following disclosures [B(SE)= 0.30(0.14), p = 0.04]. ConclusionsFindings draw attention to the potentially important role of disclosures in relationship outcomes among people in recovery from OUD. Disclosure may represent a promising intervention target to improve relationship outcomes and recovery trajectories of people in recovery from OUD.

Effects of acute exercise on drug craving in adults with poly-substance use disorder. A randomized controlled trial

ObjectivesTo examine the short-term effects of exercise on drug craving in poly-drug-dependent inpatients, duration of effects, differences between exercise types, explore the relationship between craving and mood, and possible moderators. DesignMulticenter randomized control trial (RCT) with a crossover design. Methods38 (25 completed) inpatients (37.3 ± 6.4 years; 84 % male) from three treatment centers participated in soccer, circuit training and control condition in random order for 45-min. Craving was assessed with a self-rated visual analog scale (VAS), mood with Feeling scale (FS), immediately before and after each condition and 1, 2, and 4 h post interventions. Ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) and heart rate were assessed. Intervention effects were assessed using linear mixed effects model, including moderator analyses. ResultsExercise sessions were perceived as “somewhat hard” to “hard”. Compared to control, there was an immediate reduction in craving after soccer and circuit training (β = −1.35, 95 %CI: 1.96, −0.75, p = 0.000; β = -1.44, 95 %CI: 2.06, −0.83, p = 0.000) that persisted for 4 h (β = −1.11, 95 %CI: 1.72, −0.49, p = 0.000; β = -0.85, 95 %CI: 1.49, −0.22, p = 0.008). Elevations in mood after soccer (β = 1.08, 95 %CI: 0.41, 1.76, p = 0.002) and circuit training (β = 0.99, 95 %CI: 0.32, 1.67, p = 0.004) were significantly larger than control. Depressive disorder and primary drug of use might moderate the effect. ConclusionReduced drug cravings and elevated mood following soccer and circuit training were observed in people with poly-SUDs. Single exercise sessions can be an effective strategy to alleviate craving and potentially prevent relapse and treatment drop-out.

Exploring the effectiveness of dextroamphetamine for the treatment of stimulant use disorder:\xa0a qualitative study\xa0with patients receiving injectable opioid agonist treatment

BackgroundA high proportion of people receiving both oral and injectable opioid agonist treatment report concurrent use of stimulants (i.e. cocaine and or amphetamines), which has been associated with higher rates of continued illicit opioid use and treatment dropout. A recent randomized controlled trial demonstrated the effectiveness of dextroamphetamine (a prescribed stimulant) at reducing craving for and use of cocaine among patients receiving injectable opioid agonist treatment. Following this evidence, dextroamphetamine has been prescribed to patients with stimulant use disorder at a clinic in Vancouver. This study investigates perceptions of the effectiveness of dextroamphetamine from the perspective of these patients.MethodsData were collected using small focus groups and one-on-one interviews with patients who were currently or formerly receiving dextroamphetamine (n = 20). Thematic analysis was conducted using an iterative approach, moving between data collection and analysis to search for patterns in the data across transcripts. This process led to the defining and naming of three central themes responding to the research question.ResultsParticipants reported a range of stimulant use types, including cocaine (n = 8), methamphetamine (n = 8), or both (n = 4). Three central themes were identified as relating to participants’ perceptions of the effectiveness of the medication: 1) achieving a substitution effect (i.e. extent to which dextroamphetamine provided a substitution for the effect they received from use of illicit stimulants); 2) Reaching a preferred dose (i.e. speed of titration and effect of the dose received); and 3) Ease of medication access (i.e. preference for take home doses (i.e. carries) vs. medication integrated into care at the clinic).ConclusionIn the context of continued investigation of pharmacological treatments for stimulant use disorder, the present study has highlighted how the study of clinical outcomes could be extended to account for factors that contribute to perceptions of effectiveness from the perspective of patients. In practice, elements of treatment delivery (e.g. dosing and dispensation protocols) can be adjusted to allow for various scenarios (e.g. on site vs. take home dosing) by which dextroamphetamine and other pharmacological stimulants could be implemented to provide “effective” treatment for people with a wide range of treatment goals and needs.

Dropout from psychological interventions for refugees and asylum seekers: A meta-analysis.

Refugees and asylum seekers often suffer from migration stressors and related psychopathology. However, providing this population with psychological treatment has a number of barriers (e.g., culture and language differences), which are widely thought to hinder the success and continuation of treatment. The current systematic review and meta-analysis aims to provide first comprehensive evidence on the prevalence and predictors of dropout in treatment provided for refugees and asylum seekers. We synthesized the existing evidence on dropout from psychological and psychosocial interventions provided to adult refugees and asylum seekers resettled in high-income countries. Specifically, we meta-analyzed the prevalence of dropout from treatment and explored the factors that predict dropout. Our database search in Pubmed, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and PTSDpubs identified 28 eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs; 2,691 participants; 39 active treatment conditions), published up to January 31, 2021. Results showed a weighted average dropout rate of 19.14%, 95% confidence interval [14.66, 24.60] across studies and treatment conditions. Subgroup analyses and meta-regressions revealed no statistically significant predictors for dropout. However, several refugee-specific variables (e.g., longer mean duration in country of resettlement, lower rate of insecure asylum status) may merit closer attention in future research. These findings suggest that, in contrast to widespread assumption, the estimated average dropout rate is comparable to those reported in nonrefugee populations. However, more research is needed to establish the underlying mechanisms of dropout, which may differ across populations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Exploring the Interactions between Non-Medical Methamphetamine Use and Prescribed Buprenorphine or Naltrexone in Opioid Use Disorder Treatment Retention

Objectives Our objectives were to examine the impact of methamphetamine use on opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment retention in patients prescribed either buprenorphine/buprenorphine-naloxone (BUP-NX) or naltrexone/extended-release naltrexone (XR-NTX), while also exploring the role of other risk factors that may modify the impact of methamphetamine use. Methods We conducted an exploratory retrospective study examining OUD treatment retention in 127 patients in Ohio (USA). Patients were prescribed either BUP-NX or naltrexone/XR-NTX. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to compare time to dropout of treatment between patients positive and negative on screening for methamphetamines at intake, estimate the association between other risk factors and time to dropout, and test interactions between risk factors and methamphetamine status. Results Among patients prescribed naltrexone/XR-NTX, those positive for methamphetamines had almost three times the risk of treatment dropout (AHR = 2.89, 95% CI =1.11, 7.07), significantly greater (interaction p = .039) than the methamphetamine effect among those prescribed BUP-NX (AHR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.51, 1.65). Early in treatment, being prescribed BUP-NX was strongly associated with a greater risk of treatment dropout (at baseline: AHR = 2.90, 95% CI = 1.33, 7.15), regardless of baseline methamphetamine use status. However, this effect decreased with time and shifted to greater risk of dropout among those prescribed naltrexone/XR-NTX (non-proportional hazard; interaction with time AHR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.49, 0.86), with the shift occurring sooner among those positive for methamphetamine at baseline. Conclusions Additional support should be provided to patients who use methamphetamines prior to starting OUD treatment.

Drop out from mental health treatment in the Saudi national mental health survey

Objectives To evaluate the patterns and potential risk factors associated with mental health treatment dropout in the Saudi National Mental Health Survey (SNMHS). Methods The SNMHS is a face-to-face community-based epidemiological survey in a nationally representative household sample of respondents aged 15–65 in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) (n = 4,004). The sample was limited to those who had received any type of mental health treatment during the past year (n = 168). The distribution of service use and the number of visits were examined. Predictors of treatment dropout were analyzed using logistic regression models. Results Treatment drop out rate was very high overall (42.1%), with dropout occurring early (after 2 visits) in the majority of cases. Participants who were previously married or were diagnosed with a 12-month substance use disorder were significantly more likely than other participants to drop out. Those receiving care from more than three types of providers were significantly less likely than others to terminate treatment prematurely. Conclusions The rate of premature termination of treatment was high and positively associated with previously married status and substance use and inversely related to the number of different providers and number of visits.

A randomized clinical trial of in-person vs. home-based telemedicine delivery of Prolonged Exposure for PTSD in military sexual trauma survivors

Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is common in women who experienced Military Sexual Trauma (MST). Despite Veterans Affairs Medical Center-wide screening and tailored MST services, substantial barriers to care exist, and about 50 % of those who start evidence-based treatment for PTSD drop out prematurely. Home-based telemedicine (HBT) may reduce logistical and stigma related barriers to mental health care, thereby reducing dropout. The current randomized clinical trial (NCT02417025) for women veterans with MST-related PTSD (N = 136) compared the efficacy of HBT delivery of Prolonged Exposure (PE) to in-person delivery of PE on measures of PTSD and depression, as well as on “PE dose” received. Hypotheses predicted that women in the HBT PE group would complete more sessions, and evince greater PTSD and depression symptom reduction compared to in-person PE. Results revealed that there were no differences in dose received or PTSD symptom reduction between in-person and HBT conditions; however, dose (i.e., more sessions) was related to reduced PTSD symptom severity. Future research should examine other factors associated with high PTSD treatment dropout among MST patients.

O-069 A demographic revolution? Social representations confronted with statistics

Abstract Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) regularly hit the media. Most people have an idea of ART that is based only on this prism. This restrictive view may lead to major discrepancy between what the general population thinks of these treatments and the everyday reality of ART. The most striking example of this discrepancy is probably the use of third party donors (sperm, oocyte, embryo or gestational donation). In France, the media focus almost exclusively on ART with a third party donor. The personalities who relate their experience in the media or in autobiographies are all children (now adults or adolescents) who were conceived with a third-party donor. Nevertheless, 95% of children conceived by ART in France have not been conceived through a third party. The media also highlight exceptional individual stories that give rise to strong societal controversies, such as Natalie Suleman (USA) who was called “Octomom” after she gave birth to octoplets, or Maria del Carmen Bousada de Lara (Spain) and Adriana Iliescu (Romania) who gave birth at age 66, or more recently Lulu and Nana (China) who were genetically modified twin sisters. Such reports can arouse wonder or fear, but both lead to a social representation of ART as an “omnipotent” technique. Infertile couples whose knowledge of ART is based on the media coverage may venture into these treatments thinking that as their case is an “ordinary” one, there should be no problem for them in having a baby through these technologies. Clinical statistics on ART show that even if the success rate is high, there is a gap between social expectations and reality. These statistics can be misleading, as they often assume that the couple has undergone several ART cycles. The objective of clinical statistics is usually to measure the efficacy of ART from a medical viewpoint, not from the standpoint of the couples’ care pathways. The gap between the two is considerable. The pathways of couples who undertake ART are marked by pitfalls that strongly affect success rates because of the risk of treatment dropout. In some countries, economic factors are a major reason for dropout because of the high cost of ART. France is a very interesting textbook case to explore this issue, as all infertility treatments are fully reimbursed for up to six artificial inseminations and four in vitro fertilizations for each birth. Economic barriers to ART access are minimal in such a favorable national context. Nevertheless, only about half of couples treated by ART finally become parents and success rates drop dramatically in older women. This epidemiological statistical reality is difficult to reconcile with the media presentation of ART as “omnipotent”. However, “natural miracles” can also occur as spontaneous births have been observed among couples unsuccessfully treated by ART. There are also other pathways to parenthood, such as adoption of a child. Thanks to ART, every year numerous couples become parents. But for infertile couples, the everyday reality is far from the “omnipotence” acclaimed by media headlines. The social representation of ART must move toward a more balanced perception of these technologies, bearing in mind its successes and also its limitations, especially with the current demographic trend towards childbearing at a later age that may lead to an increase in demand for ART. Change in the social representation of ART will probably need to go far beyond classic public health campaigns. ART will need to be approached differently in cultural spaces such as the media but also in movies, series or novels that have a major influence on collective social imaginaries and representations.

Preliminary psychometric evaluation of the patient reported experience measure for addiction treatment (PREMAT)

IntroductionPatient-reported experience measures (PREMs) are recommended for use in evaluating person-centred care. To date, a PREM has not been validated for residential alcohol and other drug (AOD) treatment. Utilising items developed through a previously published qualitative study informing the development of the PREM for Addiction Treatment (PREMAT), the current study conducted a psychometric evaluation and validation of the PREMAT. Design and methodsCross-sectional survey data were collected from six Australian residential AOD treatment facilities (N = 178). Psychometric evaluation included examining the factor structure, internal consistency, and construct validity of the PREMAT. Test re-test reliability was conducted at one treatment site (n = 24). ResultsThe total PREMAT score demonstrated strong internal consistency (α = 0.91). Principle components analysis identified six factors (all α > 0.72). The PREMAT total score and factor scores were negatively skewed. Concurrent validity was demonstrated by strong positive correlations with measures of satisfaction (ρ = 0.81, Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8; ρ = 0.78, Treatment Perceptions Questionnaire), and divergent validity was demonstrated with weaker correlations with Drug-Taking Confidence Questionnaire (ρ = 0.25) and Kessler-10 (ρ = −0.20). Test-retest reliability was strong for the total PREMAT (ρ = 0.89). Discussion and conclusionsResults support the use of the PREMAT as a valid measure of experience in residential AOD treatment settings. Future research should examine the use of the PREMAT across the course of treatment to examine if experience is related to client characteristics, outcome, dropout or re-engagement in treatment.

Traumatic Stress as a Treatment Priority: Its Prevalence and Impact on Children’s Mental Health Services

This study examined the prevalence of traumatic stress in children’s community mental health settings and assessed the impact of traumatic stress on therapy. Data were collected as part of a randomized effectiveness trial examining a modular treatment. Participants included 140 youth (5–15 years). Multilevel regression analyses examined predictors of treatment dropout, client crises, practice delivery, and therapist deviations from treatment plans. Findings indicate that, despite a high prevalence of trauma and the impact of traumatic stress on treatment dropout, trauma is not often perceived by clients as a treatment priority and trauma characteristics do not predict therapist practice delivery.