Abstract

Research suggests that short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy (STPP) is an effective treatment for depression in adolescence, yet treatment dropout is a major concern and what leads to dropout is poorly understood. Whilst studies have begun to explore the role of patient and therapist variables, there is a dearth of research on the actual therapy process and investigation of the interaction between patient and therapist. This study aims to address this paucity through the utilisation of the Adolescent Psychotherapy Q-set (APQ) to examine the early treatment period. The sample includes 69 adolescents aged 16–18 years with major depressive disorder receiving STPP as part of the First Experimental Study of Transference Work–in Teenagers (FEST-IT) trial. Of these, 21 were identified as dropouts and were compared to completers on pre-treatment patient characteristics, symptomatology, functioning, and working alliance. APQ ratings available for an early session from 16 of these drop out cases were analysed to explore the patient-therapist interaction structure. Results from the Q-factor analysis revealed three distinct interaction structures that explained 54.3% of the total variance. The first described a process of mutual trust and collaboration, the second was characterised by patient resistance and emotional detachment, the third by a mismatch and incongruence between therapist and adolescent. Comparison between the three revealed interesting differences which taken together provide further evidence that the reasons why adolescents drop out of therapy vary and are multidimensional in nature.

Highlights

  • Depressive disorders are among the main causes of long-term disability worldwide (James et al, 2018)

  • Whilst 60% of the completers received short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy (STPP) with transference work” (TW), amongst those who dropped out 48% received STPP with TW, this difference was not statistically significant (X2(1) = 0.97, p = 0.32)

  • There were fewer receiving STPP with TW that dropped out percentage wise (60% versus 48%), but this difference was not statistically significant in this small sample

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Depressive disorders are among the main causes of long-term disability worldwide (James et al, 2018). We have seen a striking increase in mood disorders and suicide-related outcomes among adolescents (Collishaw, 2015; Mojtabai et al, 2016; Atkinson, 2018; Twenge et al, 2018). This suggests that the provision of adequate treatment at that age is paramount. A crucial challenge remains, which is that adolescents tend to report fewer positive attitudes toward help seeking than adults (Radez et al, 2021) and tend to show high rates of premature dropout from psychological treatments (Warnick et al, 2012; de Haan et al, 2013)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call