Trauma Network Research Articles

Maternal outcomes of pregnant patients after trauma: a retrospective study of the Trauma Registry of England and Wales.

Trauma accounts for 20% of deaths in pregnant women. Injury characterisation and outcome in pregnant women following trauma is poorly described. To understand and inform optimum care of this key injury population, a study was conducted using the Trauma Audit Research Network (TARN) database. In total, 341 pregnant and 26,774 non-pregnant female patients aged 15 to 46 years were identified for comparison from the TARN database. Mortality, cross-sectional imaging, blood product administration and EQ-5D scores were compared between the two groups. Mechanism of injury, Injury Severity Score (ISS) and mortality rate before and after the creation of regional trauma networks were reported for pregnant patients. Pregnancy was recorded in 1.3% (341/27,115) of included patients, with the most common cause of injury being road traffic collisions. A reduction in crude maternal mortality was observed over the course of the study period (7.3% to 2.9%). Baseline mean EQ-5D (0.47) and EQ-VAS (54.08) improved to 0.81 (p < 0.001) and 85.75 (p = 0.001), respectively, at 6 months following injury. The incidence of trauma in pregnancy is small and mortality in injured pregnant women decreased over the study period. Pregnant patients have significantly improved patient-reported outcome measures 6 months after injury although this is limited in impact because of poor response rates and outcome reporting. Construction and validation of tools aiding in outcome reporting will help considerably in understanding further gains in the care of pregnant women.

Lack of regional pathways impact on surgical delay: Analysis of the Orthopaedic Trauma Hospital Outcomes–Patient Operative Delays (ORTHOPOD) study

IntroductionCurrent practice following injury within the United Kingdom is to receive surgery, at the institution of first contact regardless of ability to provide timely intervention and inconsiderate of neighbouring hospital resource and capacity. This can lead to a mismatch of demand and capacity, delayed surgery and stress within hospital systems, particularly with regards to elective services. We demonstrate through a multicentre, multinational study, the impact of this at scale. MethodologyORTHOPOD data collection period was between 22/08/2022 and 16/10/2022 and consisted of two arms. Arm 1 captured orthopaedic trauma caseload and capacity in terms of sessions available per centre and patients awaiting surgery per centre per given week. Arm 2 recorded patient and injury demographics, time of decision making, outpatient and inpatient timeframes as well as time to surgery. Hand and spine cases were excluded. For this regional comparison, regional trauma networks with a minimum of four centres enroled onto the ORTHOPOD study were exclusively analysed. ResultsFollowing analysis of 11,202 patient episodes across 30 hospitals we found no movement of any patient between hospitals to enable prompt surgery. There is no current system to move patients, between regional centres despite clear discrepancies in workload per capacity across the United Kingdom. Many patients wait for days for surgery when simple transfer to a neighbouring hospital (within 10 miles in many instances) would result in prompt care within national guidelines. ConclusionMost trauma patients in the United Kingdom are managed exclusively at the place of first presentation, with no consideration of alternative pathways to local hospitals that may, at that time, offer increased operative capacity and a shorter waiting time. There is no oversight of trauma workload per capacity at neighbouring hospitals within a regional trauma network. This leads to a marked disparity in waiting time to surgery, and subsequently it can be inferred but not proven, poorer patient experience and outcomes. This inevitably leads to a strain on the overall trauma system and across several centres can impact on elective surgery recovery. We propose the consideration of inter-regional network collaboration, aligned with the Major Trauma System.

FTP1.1 Using the STUMBL score to assess blunt chest wall trauma - does improving accuracy lead to improved patient care?

Abstract The STUMBL score is widely used to assess risk of complications in patients with blunt chest wall trauma. We audited its use in guiding the management of patients with rib fractures at a London major trauma centre. Methods This was a closed-loop audit. Data were collected retrospectively from electronic patient records for a period of one month (October 2021). Results were disseminated at the Regional Major Trauma Network Governance meeting. Educational updates were provided for the multidisciplinary team. After this intervention, a second one month audit cycle was completed (December 2021). Results Thirty-nine patients were included in cycle 1, of whom 41% (n=16) had care stratified using the STUMBL score. Calculation accuracy was poor: 0% had a correct score and 56.3% (n=9) had a score calculated within ±3 of the correct figure. Post-intervention, there was a significant improvement in STUMBL use in the 34 patients assessed in cycle 2: 85.3% (n=29; p=0.0001) had a documented score. Accuracy also improved, with 44.8% (n=13) within ±3 of correct and 31.0% (n=9) correct. There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients who were treated according to guidelines (74.3% vs 53.8%) or who were under-treated (23.1% vs. 38.2%) following our intervention (p=0.18). Conclusions We found a number of barriers to implementing the STUMBL score. Its use and calculation accuracy was improved by education, but this did not result in more patients following the suggested treatment pathway. Further evaluation is required to understand this discrepancy.

Trauma systems in Canada: striving for quality across an expansive landmass

Abstract Although Canada has a universal health care program that provides free in-hospital services to all citizens, its vast landmass and nonstandardized prehospital and posthospital systems make delivering quality trauma care challenging, particularly to resource-limited rural regions. This article summarizes the strengths of the prehospital system, facility-based care, trauma network, trauma registry, rehabilitation, and governance/financing/quality assurance components of Canada’s trauma system. Future directions, including the use of telemedicine, standardization of practices, and resource optimization, are also explored. Canada’s trauma system is well developed, yet geography impedes equitable access. More standardization and resource optimization are needed.

Clinical Validation of an Adult-acquired Buried Penis Classification System Based on Standardized Evaluation of the Penis, Abdomen, and Scrotum

To clinically validate a previously developed adult-acquired buried penis (AABP) classification system that is based on a standardized preoperative physical examination that subtypes patients by their penile skin/escutcheon complex (P), abdominal pannus (A), and scrotal skin (S). The Trauma and Urologic Reconstruction Network of Surgeons (TURNS) database was used to create an AABP cohort. Patients were retrospectively classified using the previously described PAS classification system. The frequency of subtypes, surgical methods utilized for AABP repair, and correlations between PAS classification and surgery subtypes were analyzed. The final cohort consisted of 101 patients from 10 institutions. Interrater reliability between two reviewers was excellent (κ = 0.95). The most common subtypes were P2c (contributory escutcheon+insufficient penile skin; 27%) and P2a (contributory escutcheon+sufficient penile skin; 21%) for penile subtypes, A0 (no pannus; 41%) and A1 (noncontributory pannus; 39%) for abdominal subtypes, and S0 (normal scrotal skin with preserved scrotal sulcus; 71%) for scrotal subtypes. AABP repair procedures included escutcheonectomy (n = 59, 55%), scrotoplasty (n = 51, 48%), split-thickness skin grafting (n = 50, 47%), penile skin excision (n = 47, 44%) and panniculectomy (n = 7, 7%). P, A, and S subtypes were strongly associated with specific AABP surgical techniques. The PAS classification schema adequately describes AABP heterogeneity, is reproducible amongobservers, and correlates well with AABP surgery types. Future work will focus on how PAS subtypes affect both surgical and patient-centered outcomes.

Soft tissue coverage of the ankle: An algorithm for appropriate flap selection and the experiences of a newly established Major Trauma Network

IntroductionReplication of the thin and pliable native skin around the ankle remains a challenge for plastic surgeons treating soft tissue defects in this region. Flap reconstruction constitutes the mainstay of management of such injuries. Subsequent management often entails revisional debulking surgery to permit normal footwear and an acceptable aesthetic outcome. In light of limited elective operating capacity throughout the covid-19 pandemic, we adopted an algorithm to inform reconstruction in such injuries and limit the need for revisional surgeries. This study presents this algorithm, which considers patient age, functional status, co-morbidities, body habitus and defect location. MethodsRetrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of all patients undergoing lower limb soft tissue reconstruction over 21 months was performed. All flap-based reconstructions of ankle defects were included; direct closures and skin grafts were excluded. All trauma patients were managed via a combined orthoplastic approach as per BOA-BAPRAS standards. All patients had Computed Tomography Angiography prior to their definitive reconstruction. Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) scores were analysed for patients with over 12 months of postoperative follow up, where available. Results71 flaps were performed in 69 patients. Open ankle fracture was the most common cause (86%); other indications included osteomyelitis and surgical wound dehiscence. Mean age was 50 (13–87 years) with a higher proportion of males to females (ratio 1.25:1). There were 26 pedicled flaps (18 Medial Plantar Artery and 8 Peroneus Brevis) and 45 free flaps (22 Anterolateral thigh, 11 Superficial Circumflex Iliac Artery Perforator, 11 Gracilis and 1 Medial Sural Artery Perforator). Mean follow-up is 13.6 months. There were three flap failures, and four patients subsequently underwent delayed below knee amputation despite successful soft tissue healing. For the patients with a minimum of 12 months follow up, LEFS scores with an average of 51% were achieved (range 15–88%). Four patients have been listed for revisional/debulking surgery. ConclusionAlthough soft tissue defects around the ankle can be difficult to manage, with careful planning and addressing each patient individually, supported by an algorithmic approach, good functional and aesthetic outcomes can be achieved with low rates of secondary revision surgery.

A Network Comparison of Sexual Dysfunction, Psychological Factors, and Body Dissociation between Individuals with and without Sexual Trauma Histories

ABSTRACT Sexual dysfunction is associated with psychological symptoms, including depression and anxiety. Sexual dysfunctions are often attributed to dissociation symptoms in individuals who reported sexual trauma histories. This study utilized a network approach to analyze relationships between sexual and psychological symptoms and examine whether the identified network structures differed between individuals who reported a history of sexual trauma and those who did not. Sexual dysfunction, history of sexual trauma, internalizing symptoms, dissociation symptoms, sex-related shame, and negative body image were assessed in 1,937 United States college students (women = 69.5%). Nearly half (46.8%) of the participants reported a sexual trauma history in their lifetime. Using regularized partial correlation networks, the relationships between sexual and psychological symptoms were analyzed and compared between groups with and without trauma histories. Internalizing symptoms were positively correlated with sexual dysfunction regardless of the presence of sexual trauma history. Anxiety had a stronger influence in the trauma network than in the no-trauma network. Feeling separated from the body during sexual activity was a central symptom and was related to difficulties relaxing and enjoying sex only in the trauma network. Sex-related shame appeared to play a more important role in men compared to women. To improve clinical practice of assessing and treating sexual dysfunction, researchers and clinicians should consider core symptoms that connect different aspects of sexual and psychological functioning while being aware of the unique role of dissociation in the context of traumatic stress.

Prehospital characteristics that identify major trauma patients: A hybrid systematic review protocol

Background: International evidence has consistently demonstrated significant improvements both in the trauma care process and outcomes for patients through re-configuring care services from that which is fragmented to integrated trauma networks. A backbone of any trauma network is a trauma triage tool. This is necessary to support paramedic staff in identifying major trauma patients based on prehospital characteristics. However, there is no consensus on an optimal triage tool and with that, no consensus on the minimum criteria for prehospital identification of major trauma. Objective: Examine the prehospital characteristics applied in the international literature to identify major trauma patients. Methods: To ensure the systematic review is both as comprehensive and complete as possible, we will apply a hybrid overview of reviews approach in accordance with best practice guidelines. Searches will be conducted in Pubmed (Ovid MEDLINE), Embase, Cochrane Library of Systematic Reviews and Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials. We will search for papers that analyse prehospital characteristics applied in trauma triage tools that identify major trauma patients. These papers will be all systematic reviews in the area, not limited by year of publication, supplemented with an updated search of original papers from November 2019. Duplication screening of all articles will be conducted by two reviewers and a third reviewer to arbitrate disputes. Data will be extracted using a pre-defined data extraction form, and quality appraised by the Newcastle Ottawa Quality Assessment form. Conclusions: An exhaustive search for both systematic reviews and original papers will identify the range of tools developed in the international literature and, importantly, the prehospital characteristics that have been applied to identify major trauma patients. The findings of this review will inform the development of a national clinical prediction rule for triage of major trauma patients.

Comparison of injury patterns and interventions between adolescent, adult and paediatric trauma cases: a cross-sectional review of TARN data

ObjectivesThe aim is to compare adolescent (10–24.99 years) trauma patterns and interventions to adult (≥25) and paediatric cases (<10) and to identify any transition points.Design and settingData were collected from...

Targeted Review and Amalgamation of Unmapped Major Trauma and Ambulance Data in Ireland: TRAUMA Study

Introduction:The trauma care system in Ireland is being re-configured to have major trauma centers for severe injuries and other sites for less severe injuries. This is to ensure patients are brought quickly to the most appropriate hospital to manage their injuries. The National Ambulance Service (NAS) electronic Patient Care Record (ePCR) records what happens to patients before they reach the hospital and the Major Trauma Audit (MTA) captures data on patients’ hospital treatment. These datasets are currently separate and if they could be joined, they would inform important decisions on which hospitals to take patients. This study aims to investigate joining these datasets to create a seamless database of the patient journey from roadside to recovery.Method:Proof of Concept–The ePCR and MTA datasets will be linked on a once-off basis. The combined anonymized dataset will then be analyzed to identify pre-hospital characteristics that determine the need to bypass smaller hospitals and bring patients to a larger major trauma center or trauma unit.Stakeholder input for ongoing dataset combination and utilization–A stakeholder consultation process will explore the best way to make a GDPR-compliant combination of datasets on an on-going basis, including geo-location data and the inclusion of patient reported outcome measures. This will incorporate the requirements of the Data Protection Commissioner, National Office of Clinical Audit, patients, clinicians, NAS, HSE and other stakeholders.Geospatial implications of major trauma services–Once ongoing data combination is approved, we will determine geospatial implications of the trauma network for prehospital care configuration and the patient journey.Results:Study results will inform prehospital service configuration to ensure safe and equitable patient management.Conclusion:The data arising from this study will capture the full trauma patient journey. This data is essential to inform policy and practice for trauma care in Ireland.

Nested trauma network design considering equity and effectiveness in patient safety

Trauma injuries continue to be the leading cause of mortality and morbidity among US citizens aged 44 years and under. Government agencies are often in charge of designing an effective trauma network in their region to provide prompt and definitive care to their citizens. This process is, however, largely manual, experience-based and often leads to a suboptimal network in terms of patient safety. To support effective decision making, we propose a Nested Trauma Network Design Problem (NTNDP), which can be characterized as a nested multi-level, multi-customer, multi-transportation, multi-criteria, capacitated model with the bi-objective of maximizing the weighted sum of equity and effectiveness in patient safety. We use mistriages (system-related under- and over-triages) as surrogates for patient safety. To add realism, we include intermediate trauma centers that are set up in many states in the US to serve as feeder centers to major trauma centers to improve patient safety and three criteria to mimic EMS’s on-scene decisions. We propose a ‘3-phase’ solution approach that first solves a relaxed version of the model, then solves a Constraint Satisfaction Problem, and then a modified version of the original optimization problem (if needed), all using a commercial solver. Our findings suggest that solutions are sensitive to (i) the proportion of assignments attributed to various destination determination criteria, (ii) distribution of trauma patients, and (iii) relative emphasis on equity vs. effectiveness. We also illustrate the use of our approach using real data from a midwestern US state; results show over 30% performance improvement in the objective value.

Severe trauma with associated pelvic fractures: The impact of regional trauma networks on clinical outcome

Lately, the care of severely injured patients in the United Kingdom has undergone a significant transformation. The establishment of regional trauma networks (RTN) with designated Major Trauma Centers (MTCs) and satellite hospitals called Trauma Units (TUs) has centralized the care of severely injured patients in the MTCs.Pelvic fractures are notoriously linked with hypovolemic shock or even death from excessive blood loss. The aim of this prospective cohort study is to compare the profile of severely injured patients with combined pelvic fractures and their mortality between two different distinct eras of an advanced healthcare system. Anonymized consecutive patient records submitted to TARN UK between 2002 and 2017 by NHS England hospitals were analyzed. Records of patients without a pelvic fracture, or with isolated pelvic fractures (no other serious injury with abbreviated injury scale AIS >2) were excluded.All patients with known outcomes were included and were divided into 2 distinct periods (pre-RTN era: between January 2002 and March 2008 (control group); and RTN era April 2013 to June 2017 (study group)). Data from the transition period from April 2008 to March 2013 were excluded to minimize the effect of variations between the developing networks and MTCs during that era. Overall, the study group included 10,641 patients, whereas the control group was 3152 patients, with a median age of 52.4 and 35.1 years and an ISS of 24 and 27 respectively. A systolic blood pressure below 90mmHg was observed in 7.2% of patients in the study group and 10.4% in the control group. A significant increase of the median time to death (from 8hrs to 188hrs) was observed between the two eras. The cumulative mortality of severely injured patients with pelvic fractures decreased significantly from 17.8% to 12.4% (p<0.0001).The recorded improvement of survivorship in the subgroup of severely injured patients with a pelvic fracture (32% lower in the post-RTN than in the pre-RTN period: OR 1.32 (95% CI 1.21 – 1.44), following the first 5 years of established regional trauma networks in NHS England, is encouraging, and should be attributed to a wide range of factors that translate to all levels of trauma care.

The Emergency-Urgency Network of Hand Surgery in Italy

This topic has been discussed on various occasions in the last 50 years and was first the subject of the European Consensus Conference (Modena, March 1999) organized by the SICM (Italian Society of Hand Surgery), SIM (Italian Society of Microsurgery) and FESUM (European Federation of Hand Emergency Services) 1, with the patronage of FESSH (European Federation of Hand Surgery Societies) and subsequently of the State Regions Conference in Italy (Gazzetta Ufficiale No. 285 of 07/12/2001) who formalized the requirements of the emergency and trauma network of hand surgery in Italy. On 27 November 2018, a Ministerial Working Table was established to organize the network. In the last 4 years, the SICM has taken part in this working table, based on the re-elaboration of what was already stated and approved in the 1999 European Consensus Conference and in the 2001 State Regions Conference. This work resulted in a “Programmatic Document for paths of the Emergency- Urgency network in Hand Surgery”. The draft agreement of the Emergency-Urgency paths for Hand Surgery was approved on 23/02/2022 (Regioni.it 4242 - 23/02/2022) 2 and states that the system will be implemented through the integration of “high specialized complexity” and “low specialized complexity” centers, according to the HUB &amp; SPOKE model.

Paediatric Major Trauma: A Retrospective Observational Comparison of Mortality in Prehospital Bypass and Secondary Transfer in the East of England.

Background More than half of seriously injured children are not initially treated at a major trauma centre (MTC). Children may be transported by private vehicle to a trauma unit (TU). Children may also be transported by emergency medical services (EMS) to the nearest TU with approximately one in five of these undergoing secondary transfer to an MTC. Most trauma networks permit TU bypass to an MTC. However, the evidence on outcomes between transfer and bypass is limited. This study aimed to evaluate the use of the trauma network by comparing outcomes between paediatric major trauma patients by the method of presentation. Methods In this retrospective observational study, a consecutive sample of paediatric (<16 years old) major trauma patients transported to the regional MTC (Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (CUH)) between 1st January 2015 and 31st December 2020 was included. Patients were excluded if they arrived at the MTC >24 hours post-injury or were transported to the MTC as the nearest hospital. Patients were divided into four groups: self-presented to MTC, MTC as nearest hospital, bypass and secondary transfer. Results A total of 315 patients (28 'self-presented', 55 'nearest', 58 'bypass' and 174 'secondary transfers') were included. The median age was 9.4 [3.7-13.6] years, and n=209 (66.3%) were male. The median Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 16.0 [9.0-25.0] and n=190 (60.3%) had an ISS >15. There was no difference in 30-day mortality between the 'bypass' and 'secondary transfer' groups.There was a significantly longer hospital and intensive care unit length of stay (LOS) in the bypass group compared to other groups, both p<0.001. The median time to definitive care was five hours greater in the secondary transfer group compared to 'bypass'(bypass 117.6 minutes [100.8-136.6], secondary transfer 418.8 minutes [315.6-529.8]). Conclusion There was no significant difference in 30-day mortality of paediatric major trauma patients who underwent secondary transfer compared to those transported directly from the scene to the MTC, despite significant time delays in reaching definitive care.

Comparing health status after major trauma across different levels of trauma care.

Mortality due to trauma has reduced the past decades. Trauma network implementations have been an important contributor to this achievement. Besides mortality, patient reported outcome parameters should be included in evaluation of trauma care. While concentrating major trauma care, hospitals are designated with a certain level of trauma care following specific criteria. Comparing health status of major trauma patients after two years across different levels of trauma care in trauma networks. Multicentre observational study comprising a secondary longitudinal multilevel analysis on prospective cohorts from two neighbouring trauma regions in the Netherlands. patient aged ≥ 18 with an ISS > 15 surviving their injuries at least one year after trauma. Health status was measured one and two years after trauma by EQ-5D-5L, added with a sixth health dimension on cognition. Level I trauma centres were considered as reference in uni- and multivariate analysis. Respondents admitted to a level I trauma centre scored less favourable EQ-US and EQ-VAS in both years (0.81-0.81, 71-75) than respondents admitted to a level II (0.88-0.87, 78-85) or level III (0.89-0.88, 75-80) facility. Level II facilities scored significantly higher EQ-US and EQ-VAS in time for univariate analysis (β 0.095, 95% CI 0.038-0.153, p=0.001, and β 7.887, 95% CI 3.035-12.740, p=0.002), not in multivariate analysis (β 0.052, 95% CI -0.010-0.115, p=0.102, and β 3.714, 95% CI -1.893-9.321, p=0.193). Fewer limitations in mobility (OR 0.344, 95% CI 0.156-0.760), self-care (OR 0.219, 95% CI 0.077-0.618), and pain and discomfort (OR 0.421, 95% CI 0.214-0.831) remained significant for level II facilities in multivariate analysis, whereas significant differences with level III facilities disappeared. Major trauma patients admitted to level I trauma centres reported a less favourable general health status and more limitations compared to level II and III facilities scoring populations norms one to two years after trauma. Differences on general health status and limitations in specific health domains disappeared in adjusted analysis. Well-coordinated trauma networks offer homogeneous results for all major trauma patients when they are distributed in different centres according to their need of care.

Treatment management and outcome of polytraumatized patients in a German certified trauma center - comparing standard versus maximum care.

German hospitals are classified as basic, standard and maximum care facilities within the German trauma networks. The Municipal Hospital Dessau was upgraded in 2015 as a maximum care provider. The aim of this study is to investigate whether a change in treatment management and outcome of polytraumatized patients has occurred afterwards. The study compared polytraumatized patients, treated in the Dessau Municipal Clinic as a standard care facility (DessauStandard) from 2012-2014 vs. those treated in the Dessau Municipal Clinic as a maximum care facility (DessauMax) from 2016-2017. Data of the German Trauma Register were analysed using the chi-square test, t-test and odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals.In DessauMax (238 patients; Ø 54 years, SD 22.3; ♂ 160, ♀ 78), the shock room time with 40.7 min (SD 21.4) was shorter than in DessauStandard (206 patients; Ø 56.1 years, SD 22.1; ♂ 133, ♀ 73 ) with 49 min (SD 25.1) (p=0.001). The transfer rate of 1.3% (n=3) to another hospital was lower in DessauMax (p=0.01). DessauStandard had 9 (4%) thromboembolic events and DessauMax 3 (1.3%) (p=0.7). Multiorgan failure was more common in DessauStandard, (16%) than in DessauMax (1.3%; p=0,001). DessauStandard showed a mortality of 13.1% (n=27), and DessauMax 9.2% (n=22) (p=0.22; OR=0.67, 95% CI, 0.37-1.23). The GOS in DessauMax (4.5, SD 1.2) was higher than in DessauStandard (4.1, SD 1.3) (p=0.002).The Dessau Municipal Clinic as a maximum care facility has achieved improved shock room time, fewer complications, lower mortality and an improved outcome.

Improvements over time for patients following liver trauma: A 17-year observational study.

Centralisation of trauma care has been shown to be associated with improved patient outcomes. The establishment of Major Trauma Centres (MTC) and networks in England in 2012 allowed for centralisation of trauma services and specialties including hepatobiliary surgery. We aimed to investigate the outcomes for patients with hepatic injury over the last 17 years at a large MTC in England in relation to the MTC status of the centre. All patients who sustained liver trauma between 2005 and 2022 were identified using the Trauma Audit and Research Network database for a single MTC in the East Midlands. Mortality and complications were compared between patients before and after establishment of MTC status. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to determine the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for complications according to MTC status, accounting for the potentially confounding variables of age, sex, severity of injuries and comorbidities for all patients, and the subgroup with severe liver trauma (AAST Grade IV and V). There were 600 patients; the median age was 33 (IQR 22-52) years and 406/600 (68%) were male. There were no significant differences in 90-day mortality or length of stay between the pre- and post-MTC patients. Multivariable logistic regression models showed both lower overall complications [OR 0.24 (95% CI 0.14, 0.39); p < 0.001] and lower liver-specific complications [OR 0.21 (95% CI 0.11, 0.39); p < 0.001] in the post-MTC period. This was also the case in the severe liver injury subgroup (p = 0.008 and p = 0.002 respectively). Outcomes for liver trauma were superior in the post-MTC period even when adjusted for patient and injury characteristics. This was the case even though patients in this period were older with more comorbidities. These data support the centralisation of trauma services for those with liver injuries.

Editorial Comment.

No AccessJournal of UrologyAdult Urology23 Feb 2023Editorial CommentThis article comments on the following:Bladder Neck Contractures Stabilize After Placement of the Artificial Urinary Sphincter Lee C. Zhao, Ashley V. Alford, and Tenny R. Zhang Lee C. ZhaoLee C. Zhao Department of Urology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York More articles by this author , Ashley V. AlfordAshley V. Alford Department of Urology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York More articles by this author , and Tenny R. ZhangTenny R. Zhang Department of Urology, NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003194.03AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail "Editorial Comment." The Journal of Urology, Publish Ahead of Print, pp. – REFERENCES 1. . Bladder neck contractures stabilize after placement of the artificial urinary sphincter. J Urol.2023; 209(5):000-000. Google Scholar 2. Durable treatment of refractory vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis via robotic-assisted reconstruction: a Trauma and Urologic Reconstructive Network of Surgeons study. Eur Urol. 2022; 81:176. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar Submitted July 22, 2022; accepted January 18, 2023; published 000. © 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsRelated articlesJournal of Urology30 Jan 2023Bladder Neck Contractures Stabilize After Placement of the Artificial Urinary Sphincter Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Lee C. Zhao Department of Urology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York More articles by this author Ashley V. Alford Department of Urology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York More articles by this author Tenny R. Zhang Department of Urology, NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York More articles by this author Expand All Submitted July 22, 2022; accepted January 18, 2023; published 000. Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...

Review of the establishment of trauma network of Ghana (TRANET): one-year review and implementation experience in a lower middle-income country.

Globally, injuries account for about 5 million deaths every year out of which 90% occur in low- and middle-income countries. Injuries, particularly trauma, place a lifelong burden on affected individuals, families and society. In Ghana and most African countries particularly in sub-Saharan Africa, there is no effective surveillance system or registry of trauma. Where they exist, they are often poorly developed and incomplete. The study was set out to document long bone fracture injuries which will be used for research, education, policy and public health prevention programmes as well as documenting the experience in setting up trauma registries in a LMIC. The study is being conducted at the four Teaching Hospitals in Ghana which are situated in Cape Coast, Kumasi, Accra and Tamale. Persons of any age (from birth) who reports to any of the sentinel sites with an incident of trauma to long bones are eligible for recruitment into the surveillance data collection. Data were captured using the Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap), cleaned and exported to Stata for analysis. Cumulatively, the sites had enrolled 3493 cases at one year of implementation. A total of 678 (19.41%) paediatric and 2815 (80.59%) adult cases were recorded over the period. In the establishment of the TRANET, we identified challenges in the planning, during data collection, data entry, follow-ups, support from local health authorities, and administrative issues. Quality improvement interventions were put in place, and it resulted in improved data quality. The established trauma registry of Ghana is assuring as it offers a timely, accurate, and comprehensive data source which will be useful for continuous monitoring of trauma care in Ghana. This first-year review information/findings will serve as a relevant information for stakeholders working to strengthen the health system.

Time to evacuation of acute subdural and extradural haematoma: prospective study before and after implementation of a major trauma centre

Purpose : Patients with Extradural (EDH) and Acute Subdural Haematomas (ASDH) represent a subgroup of head-injured patients that gain the most from timely treatment. While treatment times for head injury overall improved since the introduction of Major Trauma Centres (MTCs), no data exists describing how the time to treatment of EDH and ASDH has changed. We, therefore, compared the evacuation of ASDH and EDH before and after the implementation of a major trauma network. Methods : Data was collected prospectively between 1 May 2006 to 31 May 2007 and 1 March 2014 to 31 March 2016. The study was carried out at University Hospital Southampton, designated MTC in 2012. Patients over 18 with ASDH or EDH requiring emergency surgery were included. Results : The median time (IQR) for decompression was 4.8h (3.9–6.6) in 2006-7 and 4.4h (3.4–5.9) in 2014–16, p = 0.386. The proportion treated within 4 hours was 32% in 2006–7, and 33% in 2014-16 (p = 1.000). Analysis showed a decrease in time for CT scan (p = 0.01) and acceptance by neurosurgery (p < 0.001). There were increases in time for transferring to hospital (p = 0.005), awaiting operating theatre (p = 0.005), and operative time (p = 0.018). Conclusions : Since the introduction of MTCs, there has been no significant reduction in time to treat this select group of patients despite reductions in time to treatment of most other trauma and head-injured patients. This may be because parts of the pathway have improved, but others haven’t. It is also possible that while previously head injury was poorly served, resources were prioritised to this group so finding further gains is difficult.