There is no financial information to disclose. Overlapping surgery is attracting increased scrutiny. The American College of Surgeons (ACS) states that the attending surgeon must be present for all “critical portions” of a surgery; however, critical portions of surgeries are not defined. We hypothesized a Delphi panel process would promote and measure consensus on the critical portion of 3 common hand surgeries. We used a 3-round Delphi process to achieve consensus on the “critical portions” in carpal tunnel release (CTR), ulnar nerve transposition (UNT; subcutaneous/submuscular), and ORIF distal radius. “Critical” was based on the ACS definition. Panelists were 10 hand surgeons (7 fellowship-trained surgeons and 3 fellows). Round 1 (in-person): panel reached consensus on steps of each procedure. Round 2 (online): panelists rated steps from 1 (not critical) to 9 (extremely critical) and provided open-ended comments. Round 3 (online): panelists received summary statistics and open-ended comments from round 2 and re-rated the steps. We operationalized consensus as ≥ 80% rated a step using the same range: 1-3 (not critical), 4-6 (somewhat critical), 7-9 (critical). From round 2 to round 3 the range of scores compressed, indicating greater agreement. Final round results are summarized in Figure 29-1. For CTR, panelists reached consensus that dividing the transverse carpal ligament was critical and wound closure and dressings were non-critical. There was no consensus on skin incision or division of subcutaneous tissue. For UNT, panelists reached consensus that mobilizing the ulnar nerve, preparing the transposition, transposing the nerve, and assessing the transposed nerve were critical and closure and splint/dressings were non-critical. There was no consensus on skin incision, preservation of MABC, and hemostasis. For ORIF distal radius, panelists reached consensus that fracture reduction, skeletal fixation, and fluoroscopic evaluation were critical; fracture exposure and assessment of joint stability was somewhat critical; and hemostasis, closure, and splint/dressings were non-critical. There was no consensus on whether skin incision was critical. •For all procedures, panelists reached a consensus rating for the majority of steps, but not for skin incision.•The project provides proof of concept that a Delphi process is useful in fostering and measuring consensus on the critical portions of surgery.•Further work is needed to address areas of disagreement and the implications of a consensus that a step is “somewhat critical.” A consensus is needed whether such areas should be eliminated through further rounds or leeway in surgical practice is appropriate.•Efforts are underway to repeat this process with additional and more diverse panelists.
Read full abstract