Transtibial Pullout Repair Research Articles

Biomechanical comparison of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene sutures of different thicknesses of the tensile strength for pullout repair of medial meniscal posterior root tear.

Medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRT) are a risk factor for knee osteoarthritis. The predominant treatment for MMPRT is transtibial pullout repair, and loop suture remains the gold standard procedure. This study aimed to investigate the structural properties of the meniscus-suture-tibia (MST) complex after loop stitch using ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) suture tape of different thicknesses. This study used 20 fresh porcine MMPRT model knees. All specimens were randomised into two treatment groups: (1) pullout repair using 1.3 mm suture tape (thin group, n = 10; 1.3 mm PERMATAPE, Mitek Sports Medicine) fixation and (2) pullout repair using 2.5 mm suture tape (thick group, n = 10; 2.5 mm PERMATAPE, Mitek Sports Medicine) fixation. The single-loop stitch MS technique was utilised. The MST complex specimens were placed on a tensile tester. The structural properties of the MST complex (yield load, maximum load, liner stiffness, and elongation at failure) were identified. No significant differences were found between the thin and thick groups in terms of maximum load (108.8 ± 49.6 vs. 90.1 ± 33.6 N; p = 0.34), yield load (43.8 ± 15.2 vs. 39.4 ± 15.5 N; p = 0.53), liner stiffness (12.6 ± 8.4 vs. 11.2 ± 5.5 N/mm; p = 0.45), and elongation at failure (27.1 ± 19.4 vs. 19.9 ± 10.0 mm; p = 0.32). The structural properties of the thickness of the different UHMWPE were comparable in MMPRT repair. Additionally, 1.3 mm PERMATAPE may demonstrate similar repair potential as 2.5 mm PERMATAPE. Level Ⅳ.

Meniscus root tears: what is the hype?

Meniscus root tears are increasingly being studied due to their importance in meniscus function. Meniscus root tears can increase the joint contact pressure significantly, similar to a total meniscectomy. This may cause rapid progression of joint degeneration and produce inferior clinical outcome. Historically, they were treated with partial meniscectomy, which did not change the natural history. New repair techniques such as transtibial pull-out repair and suture anchor repair have improved the clinical outcome. This review article summarises the anatomy of the meniscus, the pathology of meniscus root tears and different repair techniques with their clinical outcomes.

Accurate tibial tunnel position in transtibial pullout repair for medial meniscus posterior root tears delays the progression of medial joint space narrowing.

This study aimed to evaluate the association between the progression of medial joint space (MJS) narrowing, medial meniscus extrusion (MME) and clinical scores and the tibial tunnel position in pullout repairs for medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs). This retrospective study examined 54 patients. Changes in MJS (ΔMJS), MME (ΔMME) and clinical scores and their relationship with the tibial tunnel position were evaluated using correlation coefficients. The distance from the anatomical to technical attachment position in the tibial tunnel position was measured in the anterior and medial directions, and the direct distance was measured using the Pythagorean theorem. The mean ΔMJS and ΔMME were 0.6 ± 0.8 and 1.3 ± 1.3 mm, respectively, and the mean anterior, medial and direct distances were 1.4 ± 2.3, 2.2 ± 1.7 and 3.4 ± 1.7 mm, respectively. ΔMJS had a significant positive correlation with the medial (r = 0.580, p < 0.001) and direct (r = 0.559, p < 0.001) distances, while ΔMME had a significant positive correlation with direct distance (r = 0.295, p = 0.030). Several clinical scores were significantly negatively correlated with these distances. In transtibial pullout repair for MMPRTs, accurate tibial tunnel position delayed the progression of MJS narrowing and MME, leading to improved clinical outcomes. The progression of MJS narrowing was associated with the mediolateral direction of the tibial tunnel position, while the clinical scores were associated with the anteroposterior direction of the tibial tunnel position. These findings indicate the need to orient the tip of the guide in a more posterolateral direction when creating the tibial tunnel. Level IV.

Biomechanical Performance of Transtibial Pull-Out Posterior Horn Medial Meniscus Root Repair Is Improved With Knotless Adjustable Suture Anchor-Based Fixation.

While posterior medial meniscus root (PMMR) techniques have evolved, there remains a need to both optimize repair strength and improve resistance to cyclic loading. Adjustable tensioning would lead to higher initial repair strength and reduce displacement with cyclic loading compared with previously described transtibial pull-out repair (TPOR) fixation techniques. Controlled laboratory study. A total of 56 porcine medial menisci were used. Eight intact specimens served as a control for the native meniscus. For the others, PMMR tears were created and repaired with 6 different TPOR techniques (8 in each group). Fixed PMMR repairs were executed using 4 different suture techniques (two No. 2 cinch sutures, two cinch tapes, two No. 2 simple sutures, and two No. 2 sutures in a Mason-Allen configuration) all tied over a cortical button. Adjustable PMMR repairs using Mason-Allen sutures were fixed with an adjustable soft tissue anchor fixation tensioned at either 80 N or 120 N. The initial force, stiffness, and relief displacement of the repairs were measured after fixation. Repair constructs were then cyclically loaded, with cyclic displacement and stiffness measured after 1000 cycles. Finally, the specimens were pulled to failure. The PMMR repaired with the 2 cinch sutures fixed technique afforded the lowest (P < .001) initial repair load, stiffness, and relief displacement. The adjustable PMMR repairs achieved a higher initial repair load (P < .001) and relief displacement (P < .001) than all fixed repairs. The 2 cinch sutures fixed technique showed an overall higher cyclic displacement (P < .028) and was completely loose compared with the native meniscus functional zone. Repairs with adjustable intratunnel fixation showed displacement with cyclic loading similar to the native meniscus. With cyclic loading, the Mason-Allen adjustable repair with 120 N of tension showed less displacement (P < .016) than all fixed repairs and a stiffness comparable to the fixed Mason-Allen repair. The fixed Mason-Allen technique demonstrated a higher ultimate load (P < .007) than the adjustable Mason-Allen techniques. All repairs were less stiff, with lower ultimate failure loads, than the native meniscus root attachment (P < .0001). Adjustable TPOR led to considerably higher initial repair load and relief displacement than other conventional fixed repairs and restricted cyclic displacement to match the native meniscus function. However, the ultimate failure load of the adjustable devices was lower than that of a Mason-Allen construct tied over a cortical button. All repair techniques had a significantly lower load to failure than the native meniscus root. Knotless adjustable PMMR repair based on soft anchor fixation results in higher tissue compression and less displacement, but the overall clinical significance on healing rates remains unclear.

Arthroscopic Transtibial Pullout Repair and Tibial Condylar Valgus Osteotomy for Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tear With Varus Knee

As an important structure for maintaining the hoop tension of the medial meniscus of the knee joint, the posterior root is receiving increasing attention. Medial meniscus posterior root tear is an important reason for the occurrence, development, and kinematics changes of knee osteoarthritis. It is necessary to repair the posterior root of meniscus for restoring joint kinematics and improving clinical efficacy. This Technical Note reports a medial meniscus posterior root tear repair technique using arthroscopic transtibial pullout repair (ATPR) combined with tibial condylar valgus osteotomy. The aim of this technique is to repair the posterior root of the medial meniscus while correcting the force line through osteotomy, opening the joint gap, improving the joint surface fit, providing a good mechanical environment for meniscus repair, thereby improving the healing rate of the posterior root of the meniscus and reducing the risk of retear. Although clinical evidence is currently limited, we believe that this technology may have more clinical advantages compared with ATPR alone or ATPR combined with high tibial osteotomy.

Superior outcomes of pullout repairs for medial meniscus posterior root tears in partial tear compared to complete radial tear

PurposeTo reveal the outcomes of partial medial meniscus posterior root tears following transtibial pullout repair compared with the outcomes of complete radial meniscus posterior root tears.Materials and methodsWe retrospectively evaluated 15 consecutive patients (male/female, 5/10; average age, 64.4 years) who underwent transtibial pullout repair for partial medial meniscus posterior root tears and compared their results with those of 86 consecutive patients who underwent the same surgery for complete medial meniscus posterior root tears. All patients underwent second-look arthroscopy on average 1 year postoperatively, and a semi-quantitative meniscal healing score (anteroposterior width, stability, and synovial coverage, total 10 points) was evaluated. Medial meniscus extrusion was evaluated preoperatively and at second-look arthroscopy.ResultsPostoperative clinical scores were not significantly different in the short term. However, second-look arthroscopy revealed a significant difference in repaired meniscal stability (partial tear; 3.3 points, complete tear; 2.3 points, p < 0.001) and total meniscal healing scores (partial tear; 8.3 points, complete tear; 7.1 points, p < 0.001). Medial meniscus extrusion progression was significantly different (partial tear; 0.4 mm, complete tear; 1.0 mm, p < 0.001).ConclusionPartial medial meniscus posterior root tears showed better meniscal healing and less medial meniscus extrusion progression following pullout repair than complete medial meniscus posterior root tears.

Initial tension at suture fixation affects the suture breakage following medial meniscus posterior root repair: A retrospective cohort study

ObjectivesThis study aimed to investigate whether the initial suture tension when pullout sutures are fixed affects postoperative clinical outcomes following medial meniscus posterior root repair. MethodsThe data of 48 patients who underwent transtibial pullout repair using two simple stitches (outer and inner sutures) with an additional all-inside posteromedial pullout were retrospectively investigated. The patients were sequentially divided into two groups to compare the clinical efficacy of the initial pullout tension (N) when pullout sutures were fixed: the 30 N Group (April 2019 to September 2019, 24 patients) and the 15 N group (October 2019 to February 2020, 24 patients). The rate of suture breakage (suture cutout or rupture) at the second-look arthroscopy at 1 year postoperatively and clinical outcomes at 2 years postoperatively were compared between the two groups. ResultsIn both groups, each clinical score significantly improved at 2 years postoperatively. At the second-look arthroscopy, the rate of posteromedial suture breakage was significantly higher in the 30 N group (19 patients, 79 ​%) than in the 15 N group (10 patients, 42 ​%); the rate of outer suture breakage was also higher in the 30 N group (five patients, 21 ​%) than in the 15 N group (no patients). On comparing 2 years of preoperative clinical scores between the groups categorized according to posteromedial suture breakage, the pain score was significantly higher in the suture breakage group. ConclusionsThe initial tension of pullout repair of the medial meniscus posterior root tear is related to suture breakages. To prevent suture breakage, 15 N is a more initially suitable condition than 30 N. Level of evidenceLevel III.

Short-term results of tibial interference screw fixation for transtibial medial meniscus posterior root pull-out repair

BackgroundTo evaluate the technique of transtibial pull-out repair with tibial interference screw fixation for medial meniscus posterior root (MMPR) tear by reporting on short-term outcomes and complications. MethodsAll MMPR repairs performed between January 2019 and August 2021 (n = 70) were retrospectively screened regarding demographic data and surgical parameters. The patients were questioned for performed revision surgery, symptoms and complications. The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain, Lysholm Knee Score and International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC) questionnaires were used to evaluate clinical outcome. In cases of revision surgery for re-tear the mode of failure was intraoperatively classified (patients with re-tear were excluded from the clinical follow-up examination). The influence of demographic and treatment parameters (surgical and rehabilitation) on the incidence and mode of re-tear and clinical scores was evaluated. ResultsAfter 2.3 ± 0.7 years, 62 patients (88.6 %) were available for follow-up. There were no direct intra- or postoperative complications. No revision was performed due to symptoms related to the tibial fixation material. The mean surgery time was 33.5 ± 10.8 min. The overall re-tear rate was 17.7 % (11 patients) of whom 10 were treated surgically and one conservatively. Primary mode of failure was suture cut-out from the meniscus (70 %). The NRS, Lysholm Knee Score and subjective IKDC were obtained in 38 patients and improved from 6.8 ± 2.4, 40.1 ± 23.9 and 32.8 ± 16.3 to 2.2 ± 2.2, 80.5 ± 16.3 and 63.0 ± 13.9, respectively (all p < 0.001). No influence was observed from demographic and treatment parameters on re-tear rates or clinical Scores. ConclusionsTibial interference screw fixation is a fast and promising technique for MMPR transtibial pull-out repair. In the presented technique, utilizing non-absorbable locking sutures alongside tibial interfenrence screw fixation, the primary mode of failure was suture cut-out from the meniscus.

Weight loss enhances meniscal healing following transtibial pullout repair for medial meniscus posterior root tears.

This study investigated the impact of weight change on the success of transtibial pullout repair for medial meniscus (MM) posterior root tears (MMPRTs). The study included 129 patients diagnosed with MMPRTs who had undergone transtibial pullout repair. The patients were screened between July 2018 and November 2021. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed preoperatively and at 12 months postoperatively using the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). MM extrusion (MME) and ΔMME (postoperative MME - preoperative MME) were calculated preoperatively and at 12 months postoperatively using magnetic resonance imaging. Patients were divided into weight loss (body mass index [BMI] decrease of at least 0.5 kg/m2 after primary repair; n = 63) and weight gain (BMI increase of at least 0.5 kg/m2 ; n = 66) groups. Both groups had similar demographic variables and preoperative clinical scores; patient-reported outcomes significantly improved postoperatively. The weight loss group had significantly greater improvement in KOOS-quality of life (weight loss, 29.4 ± 23.7; weight gain, 23.9 ± 27.6; p = 0.034), lower postoperative MME (weight loss, 3.9 ± 1.7 mm; weight gain, 4.2 ± 1.2 mm; p = 0.043) and lower ΔMME (weight loss, 0.8 ± 0.8 mm; weight gain, 1.2 ± 0.9 mm; p = 0.002) than the weight gain group. Total arthroscopic healing scores (weight loss, 7.6 ± 1.0; weight gain, 7.2 ± 1.5; p = 0.048) and associated subscales, including anteroposterior bridging tissue width (weight loss, 4.0 ± 0.0; weight gain, 3.8 ± 0.7; p = 0.004) and MM posterior root stability (weight loss, 2.6 ± 0.7; weight gain, 2.4 ± 0.7; p = 0.041), significantly differed between the groups. Weight loss was associated with better meniscal healing and less MME progression after MMPRT repair, highlighting the significance of weight management in individuals undergoing meniscal surgery. These findings provide valuable insights into the clinical significance of weight loss in the success of transtibial pullout repair for MMPRTs. Level III.

Revision Transtibial Medial Meniscal Root Repair With Concomitant Medial Opening-Wedge Proximal Tibial Osteotomy

Background: Complete meniscal root tears disrupt dispersion of axial loading forces through hoop stresses. This increases point-loading on tibiofemoral cartilage and leads to chondromalacia and accelerated osteoarthritis (OA). Posterior root tears may be treated successfully with a transtibial pullout repair. Varus malalignment also leads to increased medial compartment pressures, increasing the risk of early OA and putting increased stress on the meniscus and stabilizing knee ligaments. In particular, revision medial meniscal root repairs without correction of varus malalignment are at increased risk of failure. Genu varum may be corrected with a medial opening-wedge proximal tibial osteotomy (OW PTO). Indications: Meniscal root repairs are indicated for acute or chronic tears in active patients with healthy cartilage. OW PTO is indicated for varus malalignment in ambulatory patients with healthy cartilage, or who are at risk for failure of meniscal or ligamentous procedures. Technique Description: After exposure of the osteotomy site, arthroscopy is performed through the incision and the revision posterior meniscus root repair is performed via a double-tunnel transtibial pullout technique. The positioning of these tunnels is modified superiorly so as to not cross the planned osteotomy site. The osteotomy is then performed by drilling 2 guide pins under fluoroscopy to delineate the plane of the cut. An OW plate is placed, and the root repair is tensioned last. Results: Double-tunnel transtibial pullout repairs increase meniscal fixation contact surface and have been shown to be biomechanically superior to all-inside fixation techniques. Medial OW PTO restores knee alignment and reduces supra-anatomic stresses in the medial compartment, additionally decreasing the risk of a revision medial meniscus repair failure. Discussion: Biomechanical studies have shown that meniscal root tears are functionally equivalent to complete meniscectomy. Varus malalignment increases the risk of medial meniscal tears, and reduces the risk of a successful long-term repair. We describe a technique for a revision transosseous posterior root repair with concomitant proximal tibial osteotomy, with discussion of surgical pearls and pitfalls. This technique restores anatomic position and native function of the medial meniscus while correcting tibiofemoral malalignment that could jeopardize the repair. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form.

Intercondylar notch width and osteophyte width impact meniscal healing and clinical outcomes following transtibial pullout repair of medial meniscus posterior root tears.

This retrospective study aimed to investigate the relationship between intercondylar notch width (ICNW), osteophyte width (OW), and the healing of medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs) following arthroscopic pullout repair. The study included 155 patients diagnosed with MMPRTs who underwent transtibial pullout repair. Meniscal healing status was evaluated on second-look arthroscopy using a previously reported meniscus healing score. Patients were divided into two groups based on this score: the high healing score (group HH, healing score ≥ 8 points) and suboptimal healing score (group SO, healing score ≤ 6 points) groups. Computed tomography scans were performed on patients 1 week postsurgery. ICNW and OW widths were measured and relatively evaluated based on their ratio to the intercondylar distance (ICD), represented as the ICNW/ICD ratio (%) and OW/ICD ratio (%), respectively. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed preoperatively and on second-look arthroscopy using the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and visual analogue scale (VAS). There were no significant demographic differences between the SO and HH group (n = 35 and 120 patients, respectively). Regarding radiographic measurements, significant differences were observed in the ICNW/ICD ratio (group SO, 24.2%; group HH, 25.2%; p = 0.024), OW (group SO, 2.6 mm; group HH, 2.0 mm; p < 0.001), and OW/ICD ratio (group SO, 3.5%; group HH, 2.7%; p < 0.001). Both groups had similar preoperative clinical scores, but postoperative clinical scores, including KOOS-activities of daily living (group SO, 83.4; group HH, 88.7; p = 0.035) and VAS (group SO, 19.1; group HH, 11.3; p = 0.005), were significantly better in group HH. The study suggests that ICNW and OW may play a crucial role in MMPRT healing following arthroscopic pullout repair, as evidenced by the worse clinical outcomes associated with a narrower ICNW and wider OW. These findings highlight the potential significance of ICNW and OW assessments when evaluating meniscal repair indications. Level III.

Correlation between Subchondral Insufficiency Fracture of the Knee and Osteoarthritis Progression in Patients with Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tear

A medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT) contributes to knee joint degeneration. Arthroscopic transtibial pullout repair (ATPR) may restore biomechanical integrity for load transmission. However, degeneration persists after ATPR in certain patients, particularly those with preoperative subchondral insufficiency fracture of the knee (SIFK). We explored the relationship between preoperative SIFK and osteoarthritis (OA) progression in retrospectively enrolled patients who were diagnosed as having an MMPRT and had received ATPR within a single institute. Based on their preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), these patients were then categorized into SIFK and non-SIFK groups. OA progression was evaluated by determining Kellgren–Lawrence (KL) grade changes and preoperative and postoperative median joint widths. SIFK characteristics were quantified using Image J (Version 1.52a). Both groups exhibited significant post-ATPR changes in medial knee joint widths. The SIFK group demonstrated significant KL grade changes (p &lt; 0.0001). A larger SIFK size in the tibia and a greater lesion-to-tibia length ratio in the coronal view were positively correlated with more significant KL grade changes (p = 0.008 and 0.002, respectively). Thus, preoperative SIFK in patients with an MMPRT was associated with knee OA progression. Moreover, a positive correlation was observed between SIFK lesion characteristics and knee OA progression.

Concurrent Repair of Medial Meniscal Ramp Lesions and Lateral Meniscus Root Tears in Patients Undergoing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: The “New Terrible Triad”

Recent studies have suggested that up to 8% of patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears can present with a combined medial meniscal ramp lesion (MMRL) and lateral meniscus root tear (LMRT). MMRLs and LMRTs often are missed preoperatively and can increase the risk of ACL graft failure if left untreated. Given the potential synergistic biomechanical consequences and challenging repair techniques used for treatment, our group commonly refers to this presentation (MMRL-LMRT-ACL) as the “new terrible triad” of ACL pathology. This Technical Note aims to describe a systematic approach for arthroscopic assessment and our preferred inside-out and transtibial pull-out repair techniques to efficiently diagnose and treat a combined MMRL and LMRT at the time of ACL reconstruction surgery.

Insufficient restoration of meniscal extrusion by transtibial pullout repair for medial meniscus posterior root tears.

The long-term changes in the dynamics of the medial meniscus after transtibial pullout repair for medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs) are not completely understood. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the effects of transtibial pullout repair on MMPRTs and whether the effects would be sustained. Nineteen knees with MMPRTs that were treated by trans-tibial pullout repair were enrolled in this study. Medial meniscus extrusion (MME) was measured by ultrasonography during knee extension (no weight-bearing with the knee at 0° extension: NW0°) and 90° flexion (no weight-bearing with the knee at 90° flexion: NW90°) with the patient in the supine position and with full weight-bearing (FW0°) preoperatively and at 3 and 12months postoperatively. The clinical outcomes were assessed using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Lysholm score, and International Knee Documentation Committee score. The difference in MME with NW0° was not statistically significant between the preoperative (3.4 ± 1.0mm) and 12-month postoperative (3.7 ± 0.6mm) time points. The MME with NW90° at 3 (2.1 ± 0.7mm) and 12months (2.9 ± 0.6mm) postoperatively were significantly lower than the preoperative values (3.4 ± 0.8mm) (P < 0.05). However, the value significantly increased from 3 to 12months postoperatively (P < 0.05). The MME with FW0° at 12months postoperatively (4.3 ± 0.6mm) was significantly larger than that at pre-operatively (3.6 ± 0.9mm) (P < 0.05). All the patients' clinical conditions were significantly improved at 12months postoperatively when compared to their preoperative clinical conditions. Surgery did not reduce the extrusion in the no weight-bearing and weight-bearing positions at knee extension, and these values increased in the postoperative period. In addition, while the surgery reduced the extrusion in the knee flexion position, the restoration achieved by the surgery was not sustained in the long term. Level IV.

Comparison of medial tibiofemoral joint mechanics between all-suture anchors and transtibial pullout technique for posterior medial meniscal root tears

BackgroundThe posterior medial meniscal root tear (PMMRT) seriously impacts the tibiofemoral joint biomechanics. Two available techniques for PMMRT repair include the transtibial pullout (TPO) repair and all-suture anchor (ASA) repair techniques. These techniques have not been compared biomechanically.MethodsA total of 20 fresh porcine cadaveric knee specimens were used. All 20 knees were randomly and evenly distributed into four groups (five specimens per group): (1) intact posterior meniscal root, (2) PMMRT, (3) TPO repair technique for PMMRT, and (4) ASA repair technique for PMMRT. The tibiofemoral contact mechanics were investigated using a pressure sensor. All knee specimens were tested by being loaded with 600 N axial compressive force at three different flexion angles (0°, 45°, and 90°). The contact surface area, contact pressure, peak pressure, and time-zero displacement were recorded.ResultsThe PMMRT caused a significant decrease in contact surface area, an increase in contact pressure, and peak pressure from the reference values observed in the intact meniscus group (P = 0.05, 0.016, and 0.008, respectively). After fixation, no significant difference was observed between the ASA and intact group. Meanwhile, significant differences were found between the TPO and intact group in terms of contact surface area, contact pressure, and peak pressure. In the comparison between the two techniques, the ASA group demonstrated higher contact surface area than the TPO group at the average knee flexion angle (p = 0.05).ConclusionFor most testing conditions, the ASA technique demonstrated superior biomechanical property in terms of contact surface area compared with the TPO technique under compressive loading conditions. The ASA technique could also restore the tibiofemoral contact mechanics to be comparable with those of the native intact knee. Meanwhile, a significant difference in tibiofemoral mechanics, compared with the intact knee, could be observed in the TPO technique.

Biomechanical Comparison of Two Different Sutures for the Tensile Strength of the Pullout Repair of Posterior Meniscal Root Tear.

Background Medial meniscal posterior root tear has garnered attention because it causes increased joint contact pressure and loss of load distribution function. Currently, the common treatment for posterior meniscal root tears is transtibial pullout repair, and loop suture remains the gold standard procedure. Purpose The aim of this study is to validate whether the meniscus-suture complex exhibits better structural properties after loop stitch using a suture tape versus the conventional thread. Study design and methods This is a controlled laboratory study. In total, 20 menisci harvested from castrated male pigs were prepared and randomly assigned to two suturing techniques: loop stitch using ULTRATAPE (n = 10, tape group) or loop stitch using 2-0 UltraBraid (n = 10, control group). The single-loop stitch meniscus-suture technique was used. A single suture using ULTRATAPE or 2-0 UltraBraid was placed through the meniscus 5 mm medial from the resected edge of the posterior meniscus horn. The meniscus-suture complex specimens were mounted on a tensile tester to apply tensile load on the meniscus-suture complex parallel to the long axis of the stitched suture materials. Each specimen was stretched to failure at a crosshead speed of 50 mm/minute. The structural properties of the meniscus-suture complex (maximum load, linear stiffness, and elongation at failure) were determined. Results In the tape group, all the repaired complexes were torn at the ligature; conversely, in the control group, the threads were torn in three of 10 specimens, and the repaired complexes in the remaining seven specimens were torn at the ligature. No significant between-group differences were observed in linear stiffness (9.0 ± 4.1 vs 7.1 ± 2.9 N/mm) and elongation at failure (15.8 ± 6.1 vs 19.6 ± 20.1 mm); however, the tape group exhibited a significantly higher average maximum load than the control group (104.6 ± 41.2 vs 62.6 ± 32.1 N; P = 0.020). Conclusion Suture tape can be a potential alternative to the conventional thread for Medial meniscal posterior root tear repair. Clinical relevance Medial meniscal posterior root tear repair using tape rather than the conventional thread may be beneficial in obtaining better structural properties.

Top Ten Pearls for a Successful Transtibial Pull-Out Repair of Medial Meniscal Posterior Root Tears With a Concomitant Centralization Stitch

Although historically overlooked, medial meniscus posterior root (MMPR) tears are now increasingly recognized as a substantial cause of biomechanical impairment and morbidity. MMPR tears, when left untreated, are strongly correlated to meniscal extrusion and ultimately lead to altered kinematics and loading functionally equivalent to a total meniscectomy. To prevent progressive joint degeneration and alleviate pain while re-establishing native joint kinematics, MMPR repair is generally recommended in appropriately selected patients. In this Technical Note, the authors describe a detailed checklist with 10 crucial points of emphasis when performing the gold-standard transtibial pull-out repair of the MMPR, with an additional centralization stitch, providing technical pearls backed up by previous literature and ample experience treating this condition.

Reprint of: Outcomes of Arthroscopic All-Inside Repair Are Improved Compared to Transtibial Pull-Out Repair of Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tears

The purpose of the present study was to compare the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent an all-inside repair (with a bony trough) versus transtibial pull-out repair in medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs). We retrospectively investigated consecutive patients who underwent MMPRT repairs in nonacute tears in age over 40 from November 2015 to June 2019. All patients were divided into a transtibial pull-out repair group and an all-inside repair group. Different surgical techniques were used during different time frames. All patients were followed-up for a minimum of 2 years. The data collected included the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective, Lysholm, and Tegner activity scores. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed at the 1-year follow-up to assess meniscus extrusion, signal intensity, and healing. The final cohort consisted of 28 patients in the all-inside repair group and 16 in the transtibial pull-out repair group. In the all-inside repair group, the IKDC Subjective, Lysholm, and Tegner scores improved significantly at the 2-year follow-up. In the transtibial pull-out repair group, the IKDC Subjective, Lysholm, and Tegner scores did not improve significantly at the 2-year follow-up. Postoperative extrusion ratio increased in both groups, and patient-reported outcomes at follow-up did not differ between the two groups The change in the extrusion ratio was significantly less in the all-inside repair group (P= .009), as was the postoperative meniscus signal (P= .011). Postoperative MRI revealed significantly better healing in the all-inside group (P= .041). All-inside repair improved the functional outcome scores. Radiologically, all-inside repair was better than transtibial pull-out repair. All-inside repair may be a viable MMPRT treatment option. III, retrospective cohort study.

Posterior Horn Lateral Meniscal Root Repair Via Double-Tunnel Transtibial Pullout With Meniscocapsular Release

Background: Lateral meniscal root tears often occur in the acute setting in concert with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears. Severe changes in tibiofemoral biomechanics and joint degeneration are encountered when these injuries are either unrecognized or are treated with meniscectomy; therefore, meniscal root surgical repair is now preferred for longer-term benefits. The most common repair techniques include side-to-side and transtibial pull-out repair, which may be performed via single or double transtibial tunnel techniques. Indications: The primary indication for lateral meniscal root repair with double transtibial tunnels is suspicion for a lateral meniscal root tear based upon injury mechanism, physical examination findings, magnetic resonance imaging findings, and confirmation with diagnostic arthroscopy. Technique Description: The root attachment site is decorticated. Adhesions that cause lateral meniscal root retraction are arthroscopically released. Two separate transtibial tunnels are drilled 5 mm apart from the anterolateral tibia, entering the anterolateral tibia distal to Gerdy’s tubercle and entering the joint at the decorticated lateral root attachment site. Two suture tapes are passed through the torn lateral meniscal root in a vertical mattress configuration and shuttled with a passing suture through the tibial tunnels. The suture tapes are tied over a surgical button on the anterolateral tibia with the knee flexed to approximately 90° while the repair is viewed arthroscopically. Results: Lateral meniscal root repairs are safe and have very low reoperation rates. It has been reported that the transtibial pullout repair technique of the lateral meniscus significantly decreases lateral meniscus extrusion compared with other repair techniques in patients with combined ACL reconstruction. Zhuo et al also reported significantly improved postoperative clinical outcomes compared with the preoperative state in patients who underwent pullout repair for posterior lateral meniscal root avulsion tears. Discussion/Conclusion: The biomechanical and clinical evidence supports concomitant lateral meniscal root repair in the setting of concurrent ACL injury, and no studies to date have demonstrated a clear harm associated with this procedure. In addition, failure to repair the lateral meniscal root places supraphysiologic loads on the ACL graft and may increase the risk of graft failure. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Posterior Medial Meniscus Root Repair With Peripheral Stabilization Stitch

Background: Posteromedial meniscal root tears occur when the meniscal root detaches from the tibial plateau, which limits the native functionality of the meniscus, alters tibiofemoral contact forces, and can progress to meniscal extrusion. Untreated meniscal root tears with meniscal extrusion have been associated with significant articular cartilage loss and accelerated progression of osteoarthritis. Recent biomechanical evidence suggests restoring the contact area with the use of a peripheral stabilization suture at the posteromedial aspect of the tibial plateau. Indications: Meniscal root repair with a peripheral stabilization suture is indicated by clinical and radiographic evidence of complete detachment of the posteromedial meniscus root with significant meniscal extrusion outside the joint. Technique Description: This technique uses 2 tunnels for the meniscal root repair as well as a single additional transtibial tunnel for the peripheral stabilization suture. The described technique demonstrates a peripheral release along the meniscocapsular junction to allow the meniscus to be reapproximated to its anatomical attachment site. This is followed by transtibial tunnel preparation to allow suture passage for the meniscal root repair and an additional transtibial tunnel is created for the peripheral stabilization suture. After stabilization of the extruded meniscus, the suture is tied down over a cortical fixation device on the anteromedial tibia. Results: Significant improvement has been reported by clinical studies after the transtibial pullout repair method; however, structural outcomes have shown conflicting results. Kaplan et al reported patients treated with transtibial suture pullout technique with 2 locking cinch sutures had improved clinical outcomes, but increased extrusion of the medial meniscus compared with the preoperative state, whereas Kim et al reported a decrease in meniscal extrusion following pullout suture repair technique. Discussion: Posteromedial meniscus root repair using a peripheral stabilization suture is an effective surgical technique to restore the contact pressures of the knee and limit the amount of meniscal extrusion. This allows for appropriate correction of hoop stress to prevent further cartilage loss and progression of osteoarthritis. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.