Prion diseases, or transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs), include bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE), 1 and sporadic, familiar, and variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD). So far, 41 deaths in the U K have been attributed to variant CJD 2 which may represent transmission of BSE to human beingsY It may seem paradoxical to discuss genetics in relation to diseases; after all, the prion--here defined as the enigmatic agent that causes transmissible spongiform encephalopathies--is a paradigm of non-genetic pathology. An overwhelming body of evidence agrees that the consists solely of a modified conformer of a normal host protein, termed PrP c. The protein-only hypothesis, originally put forward by Griffith, 6 says that infectivity is identical to PrP s°, an abnormal form of the cellular protein PrP c. Replication occurs by PrP s° recruiting PrP c and converting it into further PrP s°. The newly formed PrP s¢ will join the conversion cycle and lead to a chain reaction of events that results in an ever-faster accumulation of PrP s°. This hypothesis gained widespread recognition and acceptance after Stanley B Prusiner purified the pathological protein (which he termed prpsc) 7 and Charles Weissmann cloned the Prnp gene that encodes PrP sc as well as its normal cellular counterpart, p r p c y Even more momentum was achieved when Weissmann showed that genetic ablation of Prnp protects mice from experimental scrapie on exposure to prions, '° as predicted by the protein-only hypothesis. Today, we know that the principle underlies several biological phenomena, some of which do not necessarily result in brain disease. Most notably, the propagation of certain properties of yeast, which had been unexplained for 20 years, ~ can be conveniently accounted for by a prion hypothesis32 Because yeast prions are not harmful to their infected hosts, and in some cases may even be advantageous, it is attractive to speculate that recruitment of structural traits by protein-protein interactions, besides underlying human diseases, may actually represent a fundamental principle of biology, the prevalence of which may be much greater than thus far recognised. Many variants of the protein-only hypothesis have been formulated, three of which are the most hotly debated (figure 1). Prusiner has been proposing a templatedirected refolding model, which postulates that a physical interaction between PrP c and PrP ~° is a precondition to the structural changes that underlie the pathogenetic conversion of PrP c. Some genetic evidence suggests the existence of a third partner protein, tentatively dubbed protein X, which may act as a molecular chaperon and facilitate misfolding of prpc? 3 Gajdusek and Lansbury and their colleagues ~415 have, instead, speculated that PrP c and PrP s~ exist in a
Read full abstract