Transapical Approach Research Articles

Robotic endoscopic transmitral septal myectomy and concomitant mitral valve repair for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy

Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy is a disease of the heart in which the patient develops left ventricular outflow tract obstruction due to the interaction of the mitral valve and the intraventricular septum. Although septal myectomy remains the gold standard treatment for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy, several other approaches have been described in the literature, such as a transaortic, transapical or transmitral approach via a sternotomy. All of these approaches have been shown to produce reliable reduction in left ventricular outflow tract gradients. Robotic-assisted cardiac surgery has recently become a safe and effective alternative approach to a sternotomy for several intracardiac procedures, especially mitral valve repair and, in experienced centres, septal myectomy.

Innovative use of a self-expanding valve for valve-in-valve transcatheter mitral valve replacement: experience from a four-year single-center study.

Valve-in-valve transcatheter mitral valve replacement (ViV-TMVR) is a minimally invasive option for patients with bioprosthetic mitral valve failure. Since January 2019, our center has been using a new innovative option, J-Valve, to treat patients with bioprosthetic mitral valve failure who were at high risk for open heart surgery. The aim of this study is to explore the effectiveness and safety of J-Valve and report the results from the four-year follow-up period of the innovative application of the transcatheter valve. Patients who underwent the ViV-TMVR procedure between January 2019 and September 2022 in our center were included in the study. J-Valve™ system (JC Medical Inc., Suzhou, China) with three U-shape grippers was used for ViV-TMVR via transapical approach. Data on survival, complications, transthoracic echocardiographic results, New York Heart Association functional class in heart failure, and patient-reported health-related quality of life according to the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-12 (KCCQ-12) were collected during the four-year follow up. Thirty-three patients (mean age 70.1 ± 1.1 years, 13 men) were included and received ViV-TMVR. The surgery success rate was 97%: only one patient was converted to open-heart surgery due to intraoperative valve embolization to the left ventricle. During the first 30 days all-cause mortality was 0%, risk of stroke 2.5% and risk of mild paravalvular leak 15.2%; mitral valve hemodynamics improved (179.7 ± 8.9 at 30 days vs. 269 ± 49 cm/s at baseline, p < 0.0001). Median time from operation to discharge was six days, and there were no readmissions within 30 days from operation. The median and maximum follow-up durations were 28 and 47 months, respectively; during the entire follow-up, all-cause mortality was 6.1%, and the risk of cerebral infarction 6.1%. Cox regression analysis did not identify any variables significantly associated with survival. The New York Heart Association functional class and the KCCQ-12 score improved significantly compared with their preoperative values. The use of J-Valve for ViV-TMVR is safe and effective with a high success rate, low mortality and very few associated complications, representing an alternative surgical strategy for the elderly, high-risk patients with bioprosthetic mitral valve failure.

Trans-Subclavian Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With Edwards Certitude Delivery System: A Novel Alternative Approach

Trans-subclavian (TSc) transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is the leading alternate access approach for patients with severe aortic stenosis and anatomy prohibitive for transfemoral TAVI (Society of Thoracic Surgeons TVT Registry Special report 2021). Whilst effective, the TSc approach is plagued with technical difficulties, including sheath diameter restriction, delivery catheter length redundancy, and complex angulation when approaching the annular plane for deployment. Direct transaortic and transapical approaches are technically easier in this regard due to a shorter delivery system with a retroflex function; however, they carry significant morbidity. The Edwards Certitude delivery kit, marketed for transfemoral TAVI, was adopted in bilateral subclavian approaches and an Australasian unit’s novel experience and outcomes of using it are presented.

Hybrid repair of left ventricle pseudoaneurysm utilizing a transapical and transseptal approach

Mitral valve endocarditis complicated by peri-mitral annular destruction requires surgical intervention. We present a case where surgery was not an option. A 45-year-old man who developed an enlarging left ventricle pseudoaneurysm, left ventricle to left atrium fistula and red blood cell hemolysis as sequalae of mitral valve endocarditis was not a surgical candidate. Patient underwent a hybrid repair of left ventricle pseudoaneurysm via a transapical and transseptal approach. The body of pseudoaneurysm was coiled trans-apically whereas the neck of pseudoaneurysm was reached and coiled via a transseptal approach. The left ventricle to left atrium fistula was closed via an Amplatz muscular ventricle septal occluder. The pseudoaneurysm was fully obliterated, patient symptoms improved and was discharged with stable hemoglobin levels.

Meta-Analysis on Transcarotid Versus Transfemoral and Other Alternate Accesses for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Transcarotid access has emerged as the preferred access site for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients with prohibitive iliofemoral anatomy. This study aimed to compare outcomes with transcarotid with those of other accesses in patients who underwent TAVI. Cochrane, EMBASE, and MEDLINE databases were searched for all published studies that compared outcomes with transcarotid with those of other accesses (transfemoral, transaxillary/subclavian, transaortic, and transapical) in patients who underwent TAVI. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included major bleeding, major vascular complications, stroke, myocardial infarction, permanent pacemaker implantation, and peri-aortic valve insufficiency. We included 22 observational studies with a total of 11,896 patients. Outcomes were reported during hospitalization and at 1-month follow-up. The transcarotid approach had higher mortality at 1month (3.7% vs 2.6%, p=0.02) but lower major vascular complications during hospitalization (1.5% vs 3.4%, p=0.04) than did transfemoral access. The transcarotid approach had lower major vascular complications (2% vs 2.3%, p=0.04) than did the transaxillary/subclavian but higher major bleeding (5.3% vs 2.6%, p=0.03). The transaortic approach was associated with higher in-hospital (11.7% vs 1.9%, p=0.02) and 1-month mortality (14.4% vs 3.9%, p=0.007) rates than was transcarotid access. The transcarotid approach numerically reduced mortality and the risk of major vascular complications and major bleeding compared with the transapical approach; however, this did not reach statistical significance. The transcarotid approach did not increase the risk of stroke compared with transfemoral or the other alternative accesses. In conclusion, the transcarotid or transaxillary/subclavian approach had associated comparable outcomes that were better than those of the transapical and transaortic approaches. There was no difference in stroke risk between transcarotid access and other accesses.

Transcatheter Mitral Valve-in-Valve Implantation Applying a Long Pre-Curved Sheath for Patients with Degenerated Bioprosthetic Mitral Valve.

Percutaneous transseptal transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve implantation (TMViV) has become an alternative minimally invasive treatment choice for patients with degenerated mitral bioprosthesis and high surgical risk. However, transseptal approach is more technically challenging than transapical approach in TMViV procedures. The objective of this study was to introduce the experience of applying long pre-curved sheaths in transseptal TMViV procedures and to evaluate the effect of long pre-curved sheath techniques in TMViV procedures. Between January 2020 and December 2021, 27 patients with degenerated bioprosthetic mitral valve underwent TMViV procedures using a balloon-expandable valve via the transseptal approach. The regular 14/16F expandable sheath were used for low-profile delivery in first 10 cases, and 22F long pre-curved sheath were used in the next 17 cases during procedures. We retrospectively reviewed the catheter techniques, perioperative characteristics, and prognosis. The median follow-up time was 12 (1-21) months. To further scrutinize our data, we divided the group into the early 10 patients using 14/16F expandable sheath and the subsequent 17 patients with long pre-curved sheath in order to assess the impact of different sheaths and procedural details on outcomes. Procedural success was obtained in all patients with no in-hospital mortality. Seventeen patients received 26 mm prostheses; the remaining ten patients received 29 mm prostheses. Post balloon dilatation was performed in one case. Total procedure time was (96.1 28.2) min, the fluoroscopic time was (27.4 6.5) min, and total contrast volume was (50.7 10.1) mL. One patient received blood transfusion because of hemorrhage at the femoral puncture site. One patient received a permanent pacemaker implantation due to high-degree atrioventricular block at postoperative day 3. There were no other major post-procedure complications and the median length of hospital stay was 4 days. Twenty-five (92.6%) patients improved by 1 New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class at 30 days. In subsequent sub analysis, there were shorter procedural time [(85.2 24.3) vs. (115.2 25.6) min, p = 0.0048] and shorter fluoroscopic time [(24.3 5.2) vs. (31.3 5.1) min, p = 0.0073] in cases with the long pre-curved sheath than ones with regular expandable sheath. The iatrogenic atrial septal defect (ASD) closure was performed because of the transeptal large right to left shunt in 2 cases with regular expandable sheath, but no patient needed intraoperative ASD closure in cases with the long pre-curved sheath. Transseptal TMViV using long pre-curved sheath could simplify transseptal approach with reliable outcomes for patients of degenerated mitral bioprosthesis.

Similar 5-Year Survival in Transfemoral and Transapical TAVI Patients: A Single-Center Experience

Transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TA-TAVI) is generally considered to be associated with increased morbidity and mortality compared with transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation TAVI (TF-TAVI). We aimed to compare different patient risk profiles, access-related complications, and long-term survival using inverse probability treatment weighting. This is a retrospective, single-center analysis of 925 consecutive patients with aortic valve stenosis undergoing TF-TAVI (n = 802) or TA-TAVI (n = 123) at the University Hospital Basel, Switzerland, as a single procedure between September 2011 and August 2020. Baseline characteristics revealed a higher perioperative risk as reflected in the EuroSCORE II (geometric mean 2.3 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.2 to 2.4) vs. 3.7 (CI 3.1 to 4.5); before inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) p < 0.001) in the transfemoral than in the transapical group, respectively. After 30 days, TF-TAVI patients had a higher incidence of any bleeding than TA-TAVI patients (TF-TAVI n = 146 vs. TA-TAVI n = 15; weighted hazard ratio (HR) 0.52 (0.29 to 0.95); p = 0.032). After 5 years, all-cause mortality did not differ between the two groups (TF-TAVI n = 162 vs. TA-TAVI n = 45; weighted HR 1.31, (0.92 to 1.88); p = 0.138). With regard to our data, we could demonstrate, despite a higher perioperative risk, the short- and long-term safety and efficacy of the transapical approach for TAVI therapies. Though at higher perioperative risk, transapically treated patients suffered from less bleeding or vascular complications than transfemorally treated patients. It is of utmost interest that 5-year mortality did not differ between the groups.

FIRST EXPERIENCE WITH OCCLUTECH PLD OCCLUDER TO CLOSE PARAVALVULAR LEAKS PROSTHETICS OF THE MITRAL VALVE. CASE REPORT.

This clinical case presents the results of using the Occlutech PLD occluder for transcatheter closure of a paravalvular leak (PVL) via a transapical approach in the remote period after mitral valve prosthetics. According to our results and to the literature, the procedure for closing the PVL of the mitral valve from a transapi¬cal approach using a special Occlutech PLD occluder is characterized by relative safety for patients, clinical effectiveness in terms of eliminating or reducing the degree of regurgitation and related symptoms.

Procedural Tools and Technics for Transcatheter Paravalvular Leak Closure: Lessons from a Decade of Experience

Prosthetic paravalvular leaks (PVLs) are associated with congestive heart failure and hemolysis. Surgical PVL closure carries high risks. Transcatheter implantation of occluding devices in PVL is a lower risk but challenging procedure. Of the available devices, only two have been specifically approved in Europe for transcatheter PVL closure (tPVLc): the Occlutech® Paravalvular Leak Device (PLD) and Amplatzer™ ParaValvular Plug 3 (AVP 3). Here, we review the various tools and devices used for tPVLc, based on three observational registries including 748 tPVLc procedures performed in 2005-2021 at 33 centres in 11 countries. In this case, 12 registry investigators with over 20 tPVLc procedures each described their practical tips and tricks regarding imaging, approaches, delivery systems, and devices. They considered three-dimensional echocardiography to be the cornerstone of PVL assessment and procedure guidance. Anterograde trans-septal mitral valve and retrograde aortic approaches were used in most centres, although some investigators preferred the transapical approach. Hydrophilic-coated low-profile sheaths were used most often for device deployment. The AVP 3 and PLD devices were chosen for 89.0% of procedures. Further advances in design and materials are awaited. These complex procedures require considerable expertise, and experience accumulated over a decade has no doubt contributed to improve practices.

Mitral annular calcification in patients with significant mitral valve disease: An old problem with new solutions.

Mitral annular calcification (MAC) is a chronic process involving mitral valve annulus, linked with an increased cardiovascular mortality and morbidity. Since its first autoptic description, a progressive evolution in diagnostic tools brought cardiac computed tomography (CT) scan to become the gold standard in MAC detection and classification. The treatment of significant mitral valve disease in patients with annular calcifications has always represented an issue for cardiac surgeons, being it linked with an increased risk of atrioventricular groove rupture, circumflex artery injury, or embolism. As a consequence, different surgical techniques have been developed over time in order to reduce the incidence of these fearsome complications. Recently, transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) has emerged as a valid alternative to surgery in high-risk patients. Both hybrid transatrial, transfemoral, or transapical approaches have been described to deliver balloon-expandable or self-expanding aortic transcatheter valves into the calcified annulus, with conflicting early and long-term results. Tendyne (Abbott Structural Heart, Santa Clara, CA, USA) is a promising transapical-delivered option. Early results have shown effectiveness and safety of this device in patients with MAC and severe mitral valve disease, with the lowest rate of embolization, mortality, and left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO) reported so far.

Incidence and clinical impact of tachyarrhythmic events following transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A review.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is well established for treating severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. Whereas broad information on the epidemiology, clinical implications, and management of bradyarrhythmias after TAVR is available, data about tachyarrhythmic events remain scarce. Despite the progressively lower risk profile of TAVR patients and the improvement in device characteristics and operator skills, approximately 10% of patients develop new-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) after TAVR. The proportion of patients in whom NOAF actually corresponds to previously undiagnosed silent atrial fibrillation (AF) has not been properly determined. The transapical approach, the need for pre- or post- balloon dilation, and the presence of periprocedural complications have been associated with a higher risk of NOAF. Older age, left atrial volume, or worse functional class are patient-derived risk factors shared with preprocedural AF. NOAF after TAVR has been associated with poorer survival and a higher incidence of cerebrovascular events. However, patient management differs markedly among different centers, especially with regard to anticoagulation in patients with short-duration AF episodes detected in the periprocedural setting and in cases of silent NOAF detected during continuous electrocardiographic (ECG) monitoring. Evidence about ventricular arrhythmias is even more scarce than for AF. Some case reports of sudden cardiac death after TAVR in patients with a pacemaker have identified ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation in device interrogation. TAVR has been shown to reduce the arrhythmic burden, but a significant proportion of patients (16%) present with complex premature ventricular complex arrhythmias within the year after TAVR. Whether these events are related to poorer outcomes is unknown. Continuous ECG monitoring after TAVR may help describe the frequency, risk factors, and prognostic implications of tachyarrhythmias in this population.

Effect of TAVR Approach and Other Baseline Factors on the Incidence of Acute Kidney Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a well-known complication following a transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and is associated with higher morbidity and mortality. We aim to compare the risk of developing AKI after transfemoral (TF), transapical (TA), and transaortic (TAo) approaches following TAVR. We searched Medline and EMBASE databases from January 2009 to January 2021. We included studies that evaluated the risk of AKI based on different TAVR approaches. After extracting each study's data, we calculated the risk ratio and 95% confidence intervals using RevMan software 5.4. Publication bias was assessed by the forest plot. Thirty-six (36) studies, consisting of 70,406 patients undergoing TAVR were included. Thirty-five studies compared TF to TA, and only seven investigations compared TF to TAo. AKI was documented in 4,857 out of 50,395 (9.6%) patients that underwent TF TAVR compared to 3,155 out of 19,721 (16%) patients who underwent TA-TAVR, with a risk ratio of 0.49 (95% CI, 0.36-0.66; p < 0.00001). Likewise, 273 patients developed AKI out of the 1,840 patients (14.8%) that underwent TF-TAVR in contrast to 67 patients out of the 421 patients (15.9%) that underwent TAo-TAVR, with a risk ratio of 0.51 (95% CI, 0.27-0.98; p = 0.04). There was no significant risk when we compared TA to TAo approaches, with a risk ratio of 0.89 (95% CI, 0.29-2.75; p = 0.84). The risk of post-TAVR AKI is significantly lower in patients who underwent TF-TAVR than those who underwent TA-TAVR or TAo-TAVR.

Systemic inflammation and oxidative stress contribute to acute kidney injury after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

BackgroundAcute kidney injury (AKI) is a frequent complication of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and has been linked to preexisting comorbidities, peri-procedural hypotension, and systemic inflammation. The extent of systemic inflammation after TAVI is not fully understood. Our aim was to characterize the inflammatory response after TAVI and evaluate its contribution to the mechanism of post-procedural AKI.MethodsOne hundred and five consecutive patients undergoing TAVI at our institution were included. We analyzed the peri-procedural inflammatory and oxidative stress responses by measuring a range of biomarkers (including C-reactive protein [hsCRP], cytokine levels, and myeloperoxidase [MPO]), before TAVI and 6, 24, and 48 hours post-procedure. We correlated this with changes in renal function and patient and procedural characteristics.ResultsWe observed a significant increase in plasma levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines (hsCRP, interleukin 6, tumor necrosis factor alpha receptors) and markers of oxidative stress (MPO) after TAVI. The inflammatory response was significantly greater after transapical (TA) TAVI compared to transfemoral (TF). This was associated with a higher incidence of AKI in the TA cohort compared to TF (44% vs. 8%, respectively, p < 0.0001). The incidence of AKI was significantly lower when N-acetylcysteine (NAC) was given peri-procedurally (12% vs. 38%, p < 0.005). In multivariate analysis, only the TA approach and no use of NAC before the procedure were independent predictors of AKI.ConclusionsTAVI creates a significant post-procedural inflammatory response, more so with the TA approach. Mechanisms of AKI after TAVI are complex. Inflammatory response, hypoperfusion, and oxidative stress may all play a part and are potential therapeutic targets to reduce/prevent AKI.

Comparison of outcomes of trans-subclavian versus trans-apical approaches in transcatheter aortic valve implantation

BackgroundMany patients are unsuitable for conventional femoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) but there is limited evidence as to which alternative approach has the best outcomes. We compared clinical outcomes in patients undergoing trans-subclavian (TS) or trans-apical (TA) TAVI.MethodsThis was a national retrospective observational study of patients undergoing surgical TAVI in Scotland between January 2013 and March 2020. The pre-operative patient characteristics, intraoperative details and post-operative outcomes were compared between TS and TA cohorts using data from the National Institute of Cardiovascular Outcomes Research (NICOR) registry.ResultsAmong 1055 patients who underwent TAVI, TS or TA access was used in 50 (4.7%) and 90 (8.5%) patients respectively. Self-expanding Medtronic Evolut R valves were used in 84% of TS procedures, while balloon-expandable Edwards SAPIEN valves were used in all TA procedures. The TS group had a lower mean logistic EuroSCORE than the TA group (27.31 ± 19.44% vs 34.92 ± 19.61% p = 0.029). The TS approach was associated with a higher incidence of moderate postprocedural aortic regurgitation (12.5% vs 2.4%, p = 0.025). There was no significant difference in 30-day, 1-year or overall all-cause mortality.ConclusionsBoth trans-subclavian and trans-apical access are viable approaches for patients requiring non-transfemoral TAVI. Differences in peri-procedural indices reflect the disparate patient populations and factors governing prosthesis choice, and short- and long-term mortality was similar.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation for Severe Pure Aortic Regurgitation With Dedicated Devices.

Aortic regurgitation (AR) is not the most common valvular disease; however, its prevalence increases with age, with more than 2% of those aged >70 years having at least moderate AR. Once symptoms related to AR develop, the prognosis becomes poor. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for patients with pure severe AR and at prohibitive surgical risk is occasionally performed, but remains a clinical challenge due to absence of valvular calcium, large aortic root and increased stroke volume. These issues make the positioning and deployment of transcatheter aortic valve implantation devices unpredictable, with a tendency to prosthesis embolisation or malposition. To date, the only two dedicated transcatheter valves for AR are the J-Valve (JC Medical) and the JenaValve (JenaValve Technology). Both devices have been used successfully via the transapical approach. The transfemoral experience is limited to first-in-human publications and to a clinical trial dedicated to AR, for which the completion date is still pending.

Overview of the catheter-based methods for treatment of mitralregurgitation

Mitral regurgitation or mitral insuffi ciency is the second most common valve pathology requiring a surgical treatment worldwide. It is characterized by an abnormal return of blood from the left ventricle to the left atrium during the systole. The incidence of mitral regurgitation increases in line with the rise in the life expectancy and the overall aging of the world population. According to the pathoanatomy and the mechanism of development, there are two main types of mitral regurgitation: a primary (degenerative) regurgitation and secondary (functional) regurgitation. In the fi rst type, there is organic damage to the valve and/or the valve apparatus, and in the second type, there is a secondary dysfunction of the mitral valve due to damage to the structure and/or the function of the left ventricle. The treatment of choice for the management of the mitral regurgitation is a surgical intervention. In recent years new high-tech transcatheter methods of treatment have been introduced in clinical practice. The most popular and proven method of treatment in patients who could not undergo classic cardiac surgery is the MitraClip edge-to-edge transcatheter approximation system. Other endovascular methods of treatment are percutaneous plasty device Pascal (Edwards Lifesciences) and Cardioband using transseptal approach, and also NeoChord and Harpoon using transapical approach.

P81 SIMULTANEOUS TRANS–APICAL AORTIC AND MITRAL VALVE IMPLANTATION IN A PATIENT WITH A DEGENERATED MITRAL BIOPROSTHESIS AND SEVERE AORTIC STENOSIS

Abstract Transcatheter Valve–in–Valve implantation has shown promising results in high–risk patients suffering from structural valve deterioration (SVD) of a previously implanted heart valve bioprosthesis. This is a case of a 82–year–old man, with history of multiple previous mitral valve replacement, admitted to the hospital for heart failure. During diagnostic work out he was diagnosed with a severe aortic stenosis and structural degeneration of a mitral valve bioprostheses Epic 29mm, St Jude Medical, (Inc, St Paul, Minn, USA). The heart team defined the patient at high surgical risk profile and was therefore scheduled for a simultaneous mitral and aortic transcatheter valve implantation. Through a double trans–apical approach (Figure A and B), the patient underwent two balloon expandable valves (Sapien 3, Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA) deployment in native aortic (Figure C) and mitral bioprosthesis (Figure D), respectively. Final angiography showed lack of aortic (Figure E) and left atrial (Figure E) regurgitation. The procedure was uneventful as well as the following hospital stay. Post–procedural transesophageal echocardiography confirmed the absence of paravalvular leakage nor aortic or mitral regurgitation. The patient was discharged at home on day 7. Simultaneous transapical transcatheter aortic and mitral valve replacement is technically feasible with the current available technology and can be a possible alternative in patients with high surgical risk.

Contemporary results of transcatheter mitral valve procedures: bi-centric retrospective analysis

BackgroundTranscatheter mitral valve-in-valve (TMVIV) or valve-in-ring (TMVIR) replacement offer an alternative therapy for high risk patients. We aimed to highlight the operative and postoperative results of TMVIV and TMVIR procedures.ResultsWe included all patients underwent TMVIV and TMVIR procedures between 2017 and 2020 at two heart centers in Germany. We included a total of 36 high risk patients in our study where 12 received TMVIV and 24 received TMVIR. All patients underwent TMVIV or TMVIR with Edwards Sapien XT or S3 transcatheter valves (Edwards Lifesciences). The mean age was 79 (75–83 years old). The median (IQR) preoperative STS score was 9 (7–13)% and EuroSCORE II was 14.5% (12–16). The majority of our patients were operated via transapical approach (n = 26) and the minority via transseptal approach (n = 10). Out of our records, none of our patients required reopening for bleeding or any other surgical complications. None of our patients required reintervention during the 6 months follow-up period. One mortality was recorded on fifth postoperative day due to low cardiac output syndrome (obviously because of LVOT obstruction by the anterior mitral leaflet). The average blood loss was 200 ml in the first 24 h in patients underwent transapical approach. Average operative time was 93 min and all patients were immediately extubated after the procedure in the operating room (even the patient with echocardiographically documented LVOT obstruction who died on the fifth postoperative day). Length of Intensive Care Unit stay was 2 ± 1.2 days and length of hospital stay was 4.1 ± 1.2 days. In the follow up period, echocardiograms showed normal prosthetic valve function with low transvalvular gradients, no LVOT obstruction in TMVIR cases and no evidence of valve migration or thrombosis (except in one patient). Concerning 6 months readmission, it was recorded in 2 patients due to right sided heart failure symptoms due to preexisting high degree of tricuspid valve regurge which did not disappear or even decrease after the operation and the other patient due to gastrointestinal bleeding.ConclusionsTMVIV and TMVIR offer an efficient, safe and less invasive alternative in high surgical risk patients.

Atrial Embolization after a Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement

Atrial Embolization after a Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement

Apical versus subclavian transcatheter aortic valve implantation: An 8-year United Kingdom analysis.

Subclavian (SC) and transapical (TA) approaches are the main alternatives to the default femoral delivery for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The aim of this study was to comparecomplications and morbidity/mortality associated with SC and TA in a long-term time frame. From January 2007 to July 2015, 1506 patients underwent TAVI surgery in 36 United Kingdom TAVI centers. Primary outcomes were complications according to VARC-2 criteria. The secondary outcome was long-term survival. The enrolled patients were distributed as follows: 1216 in the TAgroup and 290 in the SCgroup. There were no differences in the rates of acute myocardial infarction, emergency valve-in-valve, paravalvular leak, balloon post dilatation, cardiac tamponade, stroke, renal replacement therapy, vascular injuries, and 30-daymortality among the groups. Conversely, the rate of permanent pacemaker implantation (p = .02), the procedural time duration (p = .04), and the 12-month mortality (p = .03) was higher in SC than in TA, while in-hospital length of stay was reduced in SC than in TA (p = .01). Up to 8 years, the long-term mortality was not different among groups (p = .77), and no difference in long-term survival between self- versus balloon-expandable devices was found (p = .26). According to our results, TA provided the best 12-monthsurvival compared to SC, while the long-term survival up to 2900 days is not significantly different between groups, so SC and TA may both represent a safe non-femoral access if femoral is precluded.