Pedicle Screw Trajectory Research Articles

The Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence-based Pedicle Screw Trajectory Planning in Patients With Different Levels of Bone Mineral Density.

Retrospective cohort study. To evaluate the effectiveness of pedicle screw trajectory planning based on artificial intelligence (AI) software in patients with different levels of bone mineral density (BMD). AI-based pedicle screw trajectory planning has potential to improve pullout force (POF) of screws. However, there is currently no literature investigating the efficacy of AI-based pedicle screw trajectory planning in patients with different levels of BMD. The patients were divided into 5 groups (group A-E) according to their BMD. The AI software utilizes lumbar spine CT data to perform screw trajectory planning and simulate AO screw trajectories for bilateral L3-5 vertebral bodies. Both screw trajectories were subdivided into unicortical and bicortical modes. The AI software automatically calculating the POF and pullout risk of every screw trajectory. The POF and risk of screw pullout for AI-planned screw trajectories and AO standard trajectories were compared and analyzed. Forty-three patients were included. For the screw sizes, AI-planned screws were greater in diameter and length than those of AO screws (P<0.05). In groups B-E, the AI unicortical trajectories had a POF of over 200N higher than that of AO unicortical trajectories. POF was higher in all groups for the AI bicortical screw trajectories compared with the AO bicortical screw trajectories (P<0.05). AI unicortical trajectories in groups B-E had a lower risk of screw pullout compared with that of AO unicortical trajectories (P<0.05). AI unicortical screw trajectory planning for lumbar surgery in patients with BMD of 40-120mg/cm3 can significantly improve screw POF and reduce the risk of screw pullout.

C2 pedicle screw insertion assisted by mobilization of the vertebral artery in cases with high-riding vertebral artery

ObjectiveTo describe the feasibility, safety and efficacy of mobilization of the vertebral artery for C2 pedicle screws in cases with the high-riding vertebral artery (HRVA). MethodsDuring the period January 2020 to September 2022, fifteen patients underwent posterior occipitocervical fixation in our department. All patients had unilateral HRVA on at least one side that prohibited the insertion of C2 pedicle screws. There were 2 males and 13 females aged 47 ± 11.9 years (range: 17–64 years). After the correction of the vertical dislocation during the operation, the C2 pedicle screw insertion and occipitocervical fixation and fusion were performed using the vertebral artery mobilization technique. A routine three-dimensional reconstructed CT examination was executed to confirm the trajectory of C2 pedicle screws post-operation, and a CT angiography examination was performed when necessary. Neurological function was assessed using the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scale. The preoperative and postoperative JOA score and the main radiological measurements, including anterior atlantodental interval (ADI), the distance of odontoid tip above Chamberlain line, and clivus-canal angle (CCA), were collected and compared by paired t-test. ResultsAll 15 patients had atlas assimilation, among which 12 patients had C2–C3 fusion (Klippel-Feil syndrome). Mobilization of the HRVA was successfully completed, and C2 pedicle screws were then fulfilled after the vertebral artery was protected. There was no injury to the vertebral artery during the operation. Meanwhile, no severe surgical complications such as cerebral infarction or aggravated neurological dysfunction occurred during the perioperative period. Satisfactory C2 pedicle screw placement and reduction were reached in all 15 patients. All the patients achieved bone fusion 6 months after surgery. No looseness and shift of internal fixation or reduction loss was observed during the follow-up period. Compared to the preoperative, the postoperative JOA score and the main radiological measurements were remarkably improved and statistically significant. ConclusionsC2 pedicle screw insertion assisted by mobilization of the vertebral artery is safe and considerably effective, providing a choice for internal fixation in cases with high-riding vertebral arteries.

Pars interarticularis screws for posterior cervical fusion – investigating a new trajectory using a CT-based multiplanar reconstruction: Part I

BackgroundLateral mass screw fixation is the standard for posterior cervical fusion between C3 and C6. Traditional trajectories stabilize but carry risks, including nerve root and vertebral artery injuries. Minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) is gaining popularity, but trajectories present anatomical challenges.Research Question.This study proposes a novel pars interarticularis screw trajectory to address these issues and enhance in-line instrumentation with cervical pedicle screws.Materials and MethodsA retrospective analysis of reformatted cervical CT scans included 10 patients. Measurements of the pars interarticularis morphology were performed on 80 segments (C3-C6). Two pars interarticularis screw trajectories were evaluated: Trajectory A (upper outer quadrant entry, horizontal trajectory) and Trajectory B (lower outer quadrant entry, cranially pointed trajectory). These were compared to standard lateral mass and cervical pedicle screw trajectories, assessing screw lengths, angles, and potential risks to the spinal canal and transverse foramen.ResultsTrajectory B showed significantly longer pars lengths (15.69 ± 0.65 mm) compared to Trajectory A (12.51 ± 0.24 mm; p < 0.01). Lateral mass screw lengths were comparable to pars interarticularis screw lengths using Trajectory B. Both trajectories provided safe angular ranges, minimizing the risk to delicate structures.Discussionand Conclusion.Pars interarticularis screws offer a viable alternative to lateral mass screws for posterior cervical fusion, especially in MISS contexts. Trajectory B, in particular, presents a feasible and safe alternative, reducing the risk of vertebral artery and spinal cord injury. Preoperative assessment and intraoperative technologies are essential for successful implementation. Biomechanical validation is needed before clinical application.

Early Experience With Novel Molded Allograft Anchors for the Management of Screw Loosening in Elderly Patients With Reduced Bone Density in Primary and Revision Lumbar Surgery.

Various strategies have been used to reduce pedicle screw loosening following lumbar instrumented fusion, but all strategies have limitations. In this prospective multicenter cohort study, outcomes of elderly patients with reduced bone density who underwent primary or revision fusion surgery using a novel technique of pedicle screw augmentation with demineralized bone fiber (DBF) anchors were evaluated. This study included elderly patients (aged >65 years) with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry-confirmed reduced bone density who required lumbar pedicle screw fixation and were treated with supplemental DBF allograft anchors during primary or revision surgery. The need for DBF anchors was determined by evaluating preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans (for revision surgery) and by the surgeons' tactile feedback intraoperatively during pedicle screw insertion and removal. After determining the pedicle screw void diameter with a sizing instrument, DBF anchors and pedicle screws of the same diameter were placed into the void. CT scans were obtained on postoperative day 2 to assess pedicle breach, pedicle fracture, or anchor material extrusion and at 6 and 12 months postoperatively to assess screw loosening. Thereafter, to minimize radiation exposure, CT scans were only performed for recurrence of pain. Twenty-three patients (79% women; mean age, 74 years) received 50 lumbosacral pedicle screws augmented with DBF anchors. Most surgeries (n = 18, 78%) were revisions, and most anchors were inserted into revision pedicle screw trajectories (n = 33, 66%). Day-2 CT scans revealed no pedicle breach/fracture or extrusion of anchor material. During a mean follow-up of 15 months (12-20 months), no screw loosening was detected, and no patient required pedicle screw revision surgery. There were no adverse events attributable to DBF allografts. DBF allograft anchors appear to be safe and effective for augmenting pedicle screws during revision surgeries in female elderly patients with reduced bone density. Clinically, DBF reduced the rate of pedicle screw loosening in patients with reduced bone density. A significant reduction in screw loosening can decrease the need for revision surgeries, which are costly and carry additional risks. Enhanced bone integration from the DBF may promote better healing and long-term stability.

Design and radiological confirmation of 3-column cortical bone trajectory in the lumbar spine.

The aim of this study was to design a novel lumbar cortical bone trajectory (CBT) penetrating the anterior, middle, and posterior vertebral area using imaging; measure the relevant parameters to find theoretical parameters and screw placement possibilities; and investigate the optimal implantation trajectory of the CBT in patients with osteoporosis. Three types of CBTs with appropriate lengths were selected to simulate screw placement using Mimics software. These CBTs were classified as the leading tip of the trajectory pointing to the posterior quarter area (original CBT [CBT-O]) and middle (novel CBT A [CBT-A]) and anterior quarter (novel CBT B [CBT-B]) of the superior endplate. The authors then measured the maximum screw diameter (MSD) and length (MSL), cephalad (CA) and lateral (LA) angles, and bone mineral density (Hounsfield unit [HU] values) of the planned novel 3-column CBT screw placements. The differences in the parameters of the novel CBTs, the percentages of successfully planned CBT screws, and the factors that influenced the successful planning of 3-column CBT screws were analyzed. Three-column CBT screws were successfully designed in all segments of the lumbar spine. The success rate of the 3-column CBT planned screws was 72.25% (83.25% for CBT-A and 61.25% for CBT-B). From the CBT-O type, to the CBT-A type, to the CBT-B type, the LA, CA, and MSD of the novel CBT screws decreased with increasing trajectory length. The HU values of the three types of trajectories were all significantly higher than that of the traditional pedicle screw trajectory (p < 0.001). The main factor affecting successful planning of the 3-column CBT screw was pedicle width. Moderating adjustment of the original screw parameters by reducing LAs and CAs to penetrate the anterior, middle, and posterior columns of the vertebral body using the 3-column CBT screw is feasible, especially in the lower lumbar spine.

Mixed Reality-Based Navigation for Pedicle Screw Placement: A Preliminary Study Using a 3D-Printed Spine Model.

Background and objectives Mixed reality (MR) is one of the image processing technologies that allows the user to manipulate three-dimensional (3D) virtual images (hologram). The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of MR-based pedicle screw (PS) placement using 3D spine models. Materials and methods Using the preoperative CT data of a patient with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) who had undergone posterior spinal fusion in our hospital, a 3D-printed spine model was created. On the other hand, a 3D hologram of the same patient was automatically created using the preoperative CT data uploaded to the Holoeyes MD service website (Holoeyes Inc., Tokyo, Japan). Using a Magic Leap One® headset (Magic LeapInc., Plantation, FL), the 3D hologram with lines of predetermined PS trajectories was superimposed onto the 3D-printed spine model and PS were inserted bilaterally along with the trajectory lines from T5 to L3. As a control, we used a readymade 3D spine model of AIS and inserted PS bilaterally with a freehand technique from T4 to L3. The rate of pedicle violation was compared between the MR-based and freehand techniques. Results A total of 22 and 24 PS were placed into the 3D-printed spine model of our patient and the readymade 3D spine model, respectively. The rate of pedicle violation was 4.5% (1/22 screws) in the MR-based technique and 29.2% (7/24 screws) in the freehand technique (P = 0.049). Conclusions We demonstrated a significantly lower rate of PS misplacement in the MR-based technique than in the freehand technique. Therefore, an MR-assisted system is a promising tool for PS placement in terms of feasibility, safety, and accuracy, warranting further studies including cadaveric and clinical studies.

The accuracy and feasibility study of freehand pedicle screw insertion for subaxial cervical spine assisted with safe core-referred technique

Objectives: To construct the "safe core" of the pedicle screw trajectory using CT imaging data of the subaxial cervical spine in adults, and to assess the accuracy and feasibility of the pedicle screw insertion assisted with the "safe core-referred technique" for subaxial cervical spine with a cadaver specimen study. Methods: This is an experimental study. From January 2015 to March 2020,60 adults' CT images data of the cervical spine were collected from the database of the First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University,and were imported into Mimics 20.0 software. Virtual cervical pedicle trajectory and safe core were constructed according to the self-designed "virtual construction method of pedicle in the subaxial cervical spine". The success rate of the construction and the spatial position data of the virtual safe core of was recorded,including the distance between the safe core and the tangent line of the upper and lower outer edge of Luschka's joint on coronal plane,and the distance between the safe core and the posterior edge of the vertebral body on sagittal plane.The 3.5 mm column was used to simulate the pedicle screw placement,using the safe core as the only hub in pedicle screw trajectory.The length of the anterior pedicle screw trajectory,the interval of the abductive angle of the pedicle screw in axial plane, and the projection area of the entry area on periapical radiograph was calculated.In addition,8 adult cervical cadaver specimens were collected for the pedicle screw insertion experiment.The left side group used the "safe core-referred technique" for pedicle screw insertion,while the right side group used the Abumi method for pedicle screw insertion.The accuracy of pedicle screw placement was verified by CT scan.The difference between the accuracy of subjective judgment based on X-ray monitoring of operator and the actual accuracy of pedicle screw insertion verified by CT scan was compared between the two groups.The chi-square test was used to compare the intergroup data. Results: The total success rate of the virtual construction method for the safe core of the subaxial cervical spine was 97.0% (291/300); The distance between the safe core and the tangent line of the upper and lower outer edge of Luschka's joint on coronal plane was (M(IQR)) 0.91 (0.98) mm (range: 0 to 1.85 mm);The distance between the safe core and the posterior wall on the sagittal plane of the vertebral body was (2.01±0.86) mm (range: 0.67 to 3.53 mm). The distance (anterior pedicle screw trajectory) from the posterior cortex to the central point of the safe core was (11.58±1.00)mm (range: 8.27 to 14.93 mm).The projection area of the entry point on the coronal plane was (36.18±11.67) mm2 (range: 13.38 to 83.11 mm2). Pedicle screw insertion experiment in cervical cadaver specimen showed the rate of intraoperative correction of the pedicle screw trajectory was 7.5% (3/40) in the experimental group and 12.5% (5/40) in the control group (χ2=0.139,P=0.709). The operator 's correct rate of subjective judgment on CT in the stage of pedicle screw trajectory preparation was 100% (40/40) in the experimental group and 82.5% (33/40) in the control group, the difference was statistically significant (χ2=5.638,P=0.018). The actual correct rate of CT verification in the stage of pedicle screw insertion was 100% (40/40) in the experimental group and 90.0% (36/40) in the control group, the difference was statistically significant (χ2=2.368,P=0.124); The operator 's correct rate of subjective judgment in the stage of pedicle screw insertion completion was 100% (83/83) in the experimental group and 92.9% (79/85) in the control group (χ2=4.199,P=0.040). Conclusions: The virtual safe-core of subaxial cervical spine can be use as a reliable anatomical fluoroscopy landmark for freehand pedicle screw insertion."Safe core-referred technique" can improve the accuracy rate of the operator's subjective judgment on the intraoperative fluoroscopy monitoring,and hence improve the accuracy of freehand pedicle screw insertion technology for subaxial cervical spine. And it still needs to be further verified in clinical practice.

Free-hand technique of C7 pedicle screw insertion using a simply defined entry point without fluoroscopic guidance for cervical spondylotic myelopathy patients with C3 to C6 instrumented by lateral mass screws: a retrospective cohort study

BackgroundNowadays, both lateral mass screw (LMS) and pedicle screw were effective instrumentation for posterior stabilization of cervical spine. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of a new free-hand technique of C7 pedicle screw insertion without fluoroscopic guidance for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) patients with C3 to C6 instrumented by lateral mass screws.MethodsA total of 53 CSM patients underwent lateral mass screws instrumentation at C3 to C6 levels and pedicle screw instrumentation at C7 level were included. The preoperative 3-dimenional computed tomography (CT) reconstruction images of cervical spine were used to determine 2 different C7 pedicle screw trajectories. Trajectory A passed through the axis of the C7 pedicle while trajectory B selected the midpoint of the base of C7 superior facet as the entry point. All these 53 patients had the C7 pedicle screw inserted through trajectory B by free-hand without fluoroscopic guidance and the postoperative CT images were obtained to evaluate the accuracy of C7 pedicle screw insertion.ResultsTrajectory B had smaller transverse angle, smaller screw length, and smaller screw width but both similar sagittal angle and similar pedicle height when compared with trajectory A. A total of 106 pedicle screws were inserted at C7 through trajectory B and only 8 screws were displaced with the accuracy of screw placement as high as 92.5%.ConclusionIn CSM patients with C3 to C6 instrumented by LMS, using trajectory B for C7 pedicle screw insertion is easy to both identify the entry point and facilitate the rod insertion.

Bone density-optimized pedicle screw trajectory planning enhances mechanical stability

Bone density-optimized pedicle screw trajectory planning enhances mechanical stability

The articular surface technique for lumbar pedicle screw placement: a 3D feasibility study.

Traditional pedicle screws (TPSs) and cortical based trajectory pedicle screws each apply stability with fusions of the lumbar spine and have shown good success. However, the technical considerations of each technique imply complications of loosening and failure that either technique is uniquely prone to having. The current study proposes a new pedicle screw technique through the articular surface of the vertebral superior facet. It is hypothesized that this path will allow utilization of a larger screw that rivals that of the TPS technique, while also maintaining the high-density bone encountered in the cortical based trajectory technique. Retrospective review of 50 consecutive trauma patients that underwent lumbar computed tomography (CT) scans at a Level 1 Trauma Center in the age range 18-45. These scans were uploaded to Brainlab software for ideal starting point and trajectory mapping of pedicle screws coursing through each superior facet and pedicle of vertebral levels L1-S1 without cortical breach. Satisfactory pedicle screw variables consisted of a medial angle <10 degrees, screw length at least 30 mm, screw width at least 5.0 mm, and starting point measurements such as distance to the inferior articular surface and distance to the lateral articular surface. A total of 600 virtual pedicle screws were placed, in which 525 were satisfactory and measured with the above variables. The pedicle widths were shown to significantly widen with lower-level vertebra in the lumbar spine. Approximately 72% of unsuccessful pedicle screws were placed in levels L1 and L2 allowing wider pedicle screws to be placed more further down the vertebral column. The articular surface technique (AST) for pedicle screw placement is a viable alternative in lumbar spinal fusions that offers decreased soft tissue dissection. However, the technique is likely better suited for lower lumbar fusions in L3 to S1.

Bone density optimized pedicle screw insertion.

Background: Spinal fusion is the most common surgical treatment for the management of degenerative spinal disease. However, complications such as screw loosening lead to painful pseudoarthrosis, and are a common reason for revision. Optimization of screw trajectories to increase implant resistance to mechanical loading is essential. A recent optimization method has shown potential for determining optimal screw position and size based on areas of high bone elastic modulus (E-modulus). Aim: The aim of this biomechanical study was to verify the optimization algorithm for pedicle screw placement in a cadaveric study and to quantify the effect of optimization. The pull-out strength of pedicle screws with an optimized trajectory was compared to that of a traditional trajectory. Methods: Twenty-five lumbar vertebrae were instrumented with pedicle screws (on one side, the pedicle screws were inserted in the traditional way, on the other side, the screws were inserted using an optimized trajectory). Results: An improvement in pull-out strength and pull-out strain energy of the optimized screw trajectory compared to the traditional screw trajectory was only observed for E-modulus values greater than 3500MPacm3. For values of 3500MPacm3 or less, optimization showed no clear benefit. The median screw length of the optimized pedicle screws was significantly smaller than the median screw length of the traditionally inserted pedicle screws, p < 0.001. Discussion: Optimization of the pedicle screw trajectory is feasible, but seems to apply only to vertebrae with very high E-modulus values. This is likely because screw trajectory optimization resulted in a reduction in screw length and therefore a reduction in the implant-bone interface. Future efforts to predict the optimal pedicle screw trajectory should include screw length as a critical component of potential stability.

The pedicle screw accuracy using a robotic system and measured by a novel three-dimensional method

Robotics in medicine is associated with precision, accuracy, and replicability. Several robotic systems are used in spine surgery. They are all considered shared-control systems, providing "steady-hand" manipulation instruments. Although numerous studies have testified to the benefits of robotic instrumentations, they must address their true accuracy. Our study used the Mazor system under several situations and compared the spatial accuracy of the pedicle screw (PS) insertion and its planned trajectory. We used two cadaveric specimens with intact spinal structures from C7 to S1. PS planning was performed using the two registration methods (preopCT/C-arm or CT-to-fluoroscopy registration). After planning, the implant spatial orientation was defined based on six anatomic parameters using axial and sagittal CT images. Two surgical open and percutaneous access were used to insert the PS. After that, another CT acquisition was taken. Accuracy was classified into optimal, inaccurate and unacceptable according to the degree of screw deviation from its planning using the same spatial orientation method. Based on the type of spatial deviation, we also classified the PS trajectory into 16 pattern errors. Seven (19%) out of 37 implanted screws were considered unacceptable (deviation distances > 2.0 mm or angulation > 5°), and 14 (38%) were inaccurate (> 0.5 mm and ≤ 2.0 mm or > 2.5° and ≤ 5°). CT-to-fluoroscopy registration was superior to preopCT/C-arm (average deviation in 0.9 mm vs. 1.7 mm, respectively, p < 0.003), and percutaneous was slightly better than open but did not reach significance (1.3 mm vs. 1.7 mm, respectively). Regarding pattern error, the tendency was to have more axial than sagittal shifts. Using a quantitative method to categorize the screw 3D position, only 10.8% of the screws were considered unacceptable. However, with a more rigorous concept of inaccuracy, almost half were non-optimal. We also identified that, unlike some previous results, the O-arm registration delivers more accurate implants than the preopCT/C-arm method.

Man versus machine: Automatic pedicle screw planning using registration-based techniques compared with manual screw planning for thoracolumbar fusion surgeries.

This study evaluates the precision of a commercially available spine planning software in automatic spine labelling and screw-trajectory proposal. The software uses automatic segmentation and registration of the vertebra to generate screw proposals. 877 trajectories were compared. Four neurosurgeons assessed suggested trajectories, performed corrections, and manually planned pedicle screws. Additionally, automatic identification/labelling was evaluated. Automatic labelling was correct in 89% of the cases. 92.9% of automatically planned trajectories were in accordance with G&R grade A+B. Automatic mode reduced the time spent planning screw trajectories by 7s per screw to 20s per vertebra. Manual mode yielded differences in screw-length between surgeons (largest distribution peak: 5mm), automatic in contrast at 0mm. The size of suggested pedicle screws was significantly smaller (largest peaks in difference between 0.5 and 3mm) than the surgeon's choice. Automatic identification of vertebrae works in most cases and suggested pedicle screw trajectories are acceptable. So far, it does not substitute for an experienced surgeon's assessment.

"Critical pedicle wall" breaches analysis in complex spinal deformity using O-arm navigation.

Free-hand and fluoroscopic-guided pedicle screw placement has been associated with higher rates of pedicle breaches (frequency range 15-40% especially in deformed pedicles). Neurological complications are more "critical" (i.e., frequent and significant) with medial and inferior pedicle-wall breaches due to the proximity of the neural elements. Here, we analyzed the effectiveness of O-arm navigation in minimizing "critical" pedicle wall breaches and their complications in 21 complex spinal deformity cases. Twenty-one complex spinal deformity cases were prospectively managed with O-arm-navigated posterior-instrumented fusions. Preoperative assessment included; evaluation of the type of scoliosis, the magnitude of the deformity, and the anatomy of the pedicles - (i.e., classified using Watanabe et al.). The O-arm was used to confirm and grade both the intraoperative and postoperative location of screws. Other variables analyzed included; duration of surgery, estimated blood loss, complications, and radiation exposure. In 21 patients, 259 (63.45%) of 384 pedicles were instrumented; we observed 22 of 259 pedicle screw breaches. Significant (>2 mm) breaches were observed in two medial and one inferior wall cases that required revision; the overall biomechanically significant screw breach rate was (3/259) 1.2% with an accuracy rate of 98.8%. Pedicle screw placement resulted in another 14 nonsignificant (<2 mm) breaches; ten were medial and four involved the inferior wall. As anterior, lateral, and "in-out-in" trajectory pedicle screws beaches were nonsignificant, they were not included in our analysis. O-arm navigation decreased the incidence of medial and inferior (i.e., >2 mm "critical") pedicle screw breaches applied in 21 patients with deformed pedicles due to scoliosis. Further, the O-arm minimized the operating time, decreased the estimated blood loss, and reduced the incidence of complications.

Decreasing the Pedicle Screw Misplacement Rate in the Thoracic Spine With Robot-guided Navigation.

A retrospective chart review. The aim of this study was to evaluate the screw accuracy of thoracic pedicle screws placed with a robot-guided navigation system. Thoracic pedicles are smaller in diameter than lumbar pedicles, making pedicle screw placement difficult. Misplaced pedicle screws may present complications including decreased construct stability, and increased risks of neurological deficits and blood vessel perforation. There is a dearth of knowledge on thoracic pedicle screw accuracy placed with a robot. A retrospective analysis of the robot-assisted placement of thoracic pedicle screws was performed. Preoperative and postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans of the implanted thoracic screws were collected to assess screw placement accuracy, pedicle breadth, and placement deviations. A CT-based Gertzbein and Robbins System was used to classify pedicle screw accuracy in 2mm increments. A custom image overlay software was used to determine the deviations between the preoperatively planned trajectory of pedicle screws and final placement at screw entry (tail), and tip in addition to the angular deviation. Seventy-five thoracic pedicle screws were implanted by navigated robotic guidance in 17 patients, only 1.3% (1/75) were repositioned intraoperatively. Average patient age and body mass index were 57.5 years and 25.9kg/m 2 , respectively, with 52.9% female patients. Surgery diagnoses were degenerative disk disease (47.1%) and adjacent segment disease (17.6%). There were zero complications, with no returns to the operating room. According to the CT-based Gertzbein and Robbins pedicle screw breach classification system, 93.3% (70/75) screws were grade A or B, 6.6% (5/75) were grade C, and 0% were grade D or E. The average deviation from the preoperative plan to actual final placement was 1.8±1.3mm for the screw tip, 1.6±0.9mm for the tail, and 2.1±1.5 degrees of angulation. The current investigation found a 93.3% accuracy of pedicle screw placement in the thoracic spine. Navigated robot assistance is a useful system for placing screws in the smaller pedicles of the thoracic spine. Level III-retrospective nonexperimental study.

Biomechanical comparative study of midline cortical vs. traditional pedicle screw trajectory in osteoporotic bone

IntroductionIn lumbar spinal stabilization pedicle screws are used as standard. However, especially in osteoporosis, screw anchorage is a problem. Cortical bone trajectory (CBT) is an alternative technique designed to increase stability without the use of cement. In this regard, comparative studies showed biomechanical superiority of the MC (midline cortical bone trajectory) technique with longer cortical progression over the CBT technique. The aim of this biomechanical study was to comparatively investigate the MC technique against the not cemented pedicle screws (TT) in terms of their pullout forces and anchorage properties during sagittal cyclic loading according to the ASTM F1717 test.MethodsFive cadavers (L1 to L5), whose mean age was 83.3 ± 9.9 years and mean T Score of -3.92 ± 0.38, were dissected and the vertebral bodies embedded in polyurethane casting resin. Then, one screw was randomly inserted into each vertebra using a template according to the MC technique and a second one was inserted by freehand technique with traditional trajectory (TT). The screws were quasi-static extracted from vertebrae L1 and L3, while for L2, L4 and L5 they were first tested dynamically according to ASTM standard F1717 (10,000 cycles at 1 Hz between 10 and 110 N) and then quasi-static extracted. In order to determine possible screw loosening, there movements were recorded during the dynamic tests using an optical measurement system.ResultsThe pull-out tests show a higher pull-out strength for the MC technique of 555.4 ± 237.0 N compared to the TT technique 448.8 ± 303.2 N. During the dynamic tests (L2, L4, L5), 8 out of the 15 TT screws became loose before completing 10,000 cycles. In contrast, all 15 MC screws did not exceed the termination criterion and were thus able to complete the full test procedure. For the runners, the optical measurement showed greater relative movement of the TT variant compared to the MC variant. The pull-out tests also revealed that the MC variant had a higher pull-out strength, measuring at766.7 ± 385.4 N, while the TT variant measured 637.4 ± 435.6 N.ConclusionThe highest pullout forces were achieved by the MC technique. The main difference between the techniques was observed in the dynamic measurements, where the MC technique exhibited superior primary stability compared to the conventional technique in terms of primary stability. Overall, the MC technique in combination with template-guided insertion represents the best alternative for anchoring screws in osteoporotic bone without cement.

Risk factors for distal construct failure in posterior spinal instrumented fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a retrospective cohort study.

To evaluate risk factors for distal construct failure (DCF) in posterior spinal instrumented fusion (PSIF) in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). We hypothesise increased inferior angulation of the pedicle screw in the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) predisposes to failure and aim to find the critical angle that predisposes to failure. A retrospective cohort study was performed on all patients who underwent PSIF for AIS at our institution from 2010 to 2020. On lateral radiographs, the angle between the superior endplate of the LIV was measured against its pedicle screw trajectory. Data on demographics, Cobb angle, Lenke classification, instrumentation density, rod protrusion from the most inferior screw, implants and reasons for revision were collected. Of 256 patients, 9 patients had DCF with 3 further failures post-revision, giving 12 cases to analyse. The DCF rate was 4.6%. The mean trajectory angle of DCF patients compared to non-DCF was 13.3° (95% CI 9.2° to 17.4°) vs. 7.6° (7.0° to 8.2°), p = 0.0002. The critical angle is less than 11° (p = 0.0076), OR 5.15. Lenke 5 and C curves, lower preoperative Cobb angle, titanium only rod constructs and one surgeon had higher failure rates. 9.6% of rods protruding less than 3mm from its distal screw disengaged. Increased inferior trajectory of the LIV screw increases the rate of DCF; inferior trajectory greater than 11° predisposes to failure. Rod protrusion less than 3mm from the distal screw increases rate of disengagement. III.

“Satellite pedicle screws” - A novel technique of pedicle screw insertion in obese patients undergoing lumbar fusion

The presence of thick sub-cutaneous fat and bulky paraspinal musculature mandates extensive surgical dissection in obese patients undergoing open Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery. Securing a ‘converging’ pedicle screw trajectory becomes difficult by the counterforces of the erector spinae muscles and thick sub-cutaneous fat in obese patients, especially at the L5-S1 level. We describe the use of a limited standard posterior midline exposure and a separate, far lateral ‘satellite’ incision to insert pedicle screws in an optimal trajectory in obese patients. Through proper pre-operative planning of the axial and sagittal MRI, the appropriate entry site is determined which is executed intra-operatively to insert pedicle screws freehand. Through a single 1.5 cm incision, both L5-S1 screws were inserted. Fourteen obese patients (mean BMI was 30.5 ± 1.1) received 56 satellite pedicle screws for TLIF at L5-S1 level. The mean age was 48.3 ± 9.7 years. The mean blood loss was 244.8 ± 114 ml and the mean operative time was 126.7 ± 82.8 min. In all patients, the screws were inserted as per pre-operative planning without any difficulties. All wounds healed well without wound complications. There were no screw related complications, and in the antero-posterior and lateral radiographs, there were no screw breaches. Satellite free-hand pedicle screws are safe and easily reproducible. They enable limited dissection of the main surgical wound and well-medialised converging pedicle screws in obese patients.

Three-Dimensional Hounsfield Units Measurement of Pedicle Screw Trajectory for Predicating Screw Loosening in Lumbar Fusion Surgery.

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is commonly used for evaluation of bone mineral density before spinal surgery, but frequently leads to overestimation in degenerative spinal diseases due to osteoproliferation factors. We introduce a novel method to compare the predictive ability of Hounsfield Units (HU) and DXA methods to predict screw loosening after lumbar interbody fusion surgery in degenerative spinal diseases by measuring HU of pedicle screw trajectory on computed tomography (CT) images preoperatively. This retrospective study was conducted on patients who underwent posterior lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative diseases. CT HUs measurement was performed using medical imaging software, including the cancellous region on cross-sections of the vertebral body and three-dimensional pedicle screw trajectory. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed for the risk of pedicle screw loosening in association with the Hounsfield scale and preoperative BMD, and the area under the curve (AUC) and the cutoff values were calculated. A total of 90 patients were enrolled and were divided into loosening (n = 33, 36.7%) and non-loosening groups (n = 57, 63.3%). No significant differences in age, gender, length of fixation and preoperative BMD were found between both groups. The loosening group showed lower CT HU values in the vertebral body and screw trajectory than the non-loosening group. Screw trajectory HU (ST-HU) exhibited a higher AUC value than vertebral body HU (B-HU). The cutoff values of B-HU and ST-HU were 160 and 110 HUs, respectively. Three-dimensional pedicle screw trajectory HU values yields a stronger predictive value than vertebral body HU values and BMD and may provide more guidance for surgery. The risk of screw loosening is significantly increased at ST-HU <110 or B-HU <160 at L5 segment.

How different augmented reality visualizations for drilling affect trajectory deviation, visual attention, and user experience

PurposePrevious work has demonstrated the high accuracy of augmented reality (AR) head-mounted displays for pedicle screw placement in spinal fusion surgery. An important question that remains unanswered is how pedicle screw trajectories should be visualized in AR to best assist the surgeon.MethodologyWe compared five AR visualizations displaying the drill trajectory via Microsoft HoloLens 2 with different configurations of abstraction level (abstract or anatomical), position (overlay or small offset), and dimensionality (2D or 3D) against standard navigation on an external screen. We tested these visualizations in a study with 4 expert surgeons and 10 novices (residents in orthopedic surgery) on lumbar spine models covered by Plasticine. We assessed trajectory deviations (^circ ) from the preoperative plan, dwell times (%) on areas of interest, and the user experience.ResultsTwo AR visualizations resulted in significantly lower trajectory deviations (mixed-effects ANOVA, p<0.0001 and p<0.05) compared to standard navigation, whereas no significant differences were found between participant groups. The best ratings for ease of use and cognitive load were obtained with an abstract visualization displayed peripherally around the entry point and with a 3D anatomical visualization displayed with some offset. For visualizations displayed with some offset, participants spent on average only 20% of their time examining the entry point area.ConclusionOur results show that real-time feedback provided by navigation can level task performance between experts and novices, and that the design of a visualization has a significant impact on task performance, visual attention, and user experience. Both abstract and anatomical visualizations can be suitable for navigation when not directly occluding the execution area. Our results shed light on how AR visualizations guide visual attention and the benefits of anchoring information in the peripheral field around the entry point.