A blowdown and produced water cotreatment train design was preliminarily simulated to explore water-energy nexus synergy. This process model was able to provide results concerning water compositions, chemical demand, and energy intensity. The computational expense associated with this simulation made it intractable to use within optimization algorithms for further informative, comprehensive systems analyses. This work details the efforts of developing a framework suitable for the optimization of computationally demanding wastewater treatment train simulations, specifically demonstrated for the cotreatment train’s process, economic, and sustainability models. The unique challenges of the cotreatment train model motivated a modified surrogate optimization methodology to be developed. Using this framework, worst and best case economic scenarios were optimized to minimize the levelized cost of water (LCOW) employed in a reduced-order model-based simulation. Applying the optimal designs obtained from the surrogate optimization into the original comprehensive simulation resulted in an expected range of LCOW from $2.01 to $4.43m-3. Other established techno-economic and sustainability indicators further inform on process implications. The process was compared to current management practices of blowdown water treatment and produced water injection to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the proposed cotreatment train designed for water reuse. The cotreatment process was estimated to have lower levelized treatment costs but require more chemicals and energy to manage a higher salinity wastewater than pure blowdown water alone. If sustainable management goals motivate produced water remediation, the cotreatment process can be beneficial for the broader scope of water management.
Read full abstract