Hand Hygiene Training Research Articles

Association of PPE Availability, Training, and Practices with COVID-19 Sero-Prevalence in Nurses and Paramedics in Tertiary Care Hospitals of Peshawar, Pakistan.

Nurses and paramedics by being the frontline workers of the health-care profession need to be equipped with the relevant knowledge, skills, and protective gears against different forms of infection, including coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Although the governments and concerned stakeholders have provided personal protective equipment (PPE), training and information to protect the health-care professionals; however, until now the scientific literature has virtually not reported the impact of PPE availability, training, and practices on the COVID-19 sero-prevalence among the nurses and paramedics. This study aimed to assess the impact of PPE availability, training, and practices on COVID-19 sero-prevalence among nurses and paramedics in teaching hospitals of Peshawar, Pakistan. A cross-sectional survey was conducted with a total of 133 nurses and paramedics as subjects of the study. A univariate analysis was done for 4 variables. The findings indicate that the health-care professionals (nurses and paramedics) who have received PPE on time at the start of COVID-19 emergence have fewer chances of contracting the COVID-19 infection (odds ratio = 0.96); while the odds for PPE supplies was 0.73, and the odds of hand hygiene training was 0.95. The study concluded that the availability of the PPE, COVID-19-related training, and compliance with World Health Organization recommended practices against COVID-19 were instrumental in protection against the infection and its spread.

Infection Prevention and Control Measures at the Children Hospital Lahore: A My Child Matters Collaborative Project.

PURPOSEInfection prevention among children with cancer is a major challenge at Children Hospital Lahore (CHL), a public health care facility in Pakistan with 1,000 new pediatric cancer admissions annually. The objective has been to reduce infections through collaboration between CHL and the St Jude Children’s Hospital Global Infectious Disease program via a grant by the Sanofi Espoir foundation through the My Child Matters program. The aim of the current study was to describe the effect of the collaborative improvement strategy on existing infection prevention and control (IPC) standards at CHL.MATERIALS AND METHODSOur work was a prospective before-and-after study to improve IPC standards. We compared the WHO Hand Hygiene Self-Assessment Framework and four modules of the St Jude modified Infection Control Assessment Tool (ICAT) scores over a 3-year period. Our strategy included creating a multidisciplinary team of pediatric oncologists, infectious disease physicians, nurses, a microbiologist, and a data manager; engaging in monthly online IPC mentoring sessions with St Jude Children’s Hospital Global Infectious Disease program and My Child Matters mentors; performing daily inpatient health care–associated infection surveillance rounds; and performing regular hand hygiene training and compliance audits.RESULTSBaseline needs assessment showed health care–associated infections identified by positive blood cultures as 8.7 infections per 1,000 patient-days. Deficient hand hygiene supplies, health education measures, and bed sharing of neutropenic patients were identified as major challenges. Our hand hygiene facility level, per WHO scores, increased from Inadequate to Intermediate/Consolidation by the end of the 3-year implementation (122 v 352 WHO Hand Hygiene Self-Assessment Framework scores). The sink:bed and hand sanitizer:bed ratios improved to 1:6 and 1:1, respectively. The ICAT general infection control module increased by 40% (45 v 78 ICAT scores) and hygiene compliance improved by 20%.CONCLUSIONImplementing a collaborative improvement strategy improved IPC standards in our center, which can be easily replicated in other pediatric oncology centers in lower- and middle-income countries.

Assessment and Comparison of Knowledge and Awareness about Hand Hygiene among Health Care Workers from PHC and Medical College

Objectives: Present study was conducted to assess and compare the knowledge of hand hygiene (HH)according to WHO guidelines among healthcare workers (HCW) from medical college hospital and primaryhealth care centre (PHC). Improvement in knowledge of HH was assessed after training.Method: Cross-sectional study was conducted in two groups comprising of 167 HCW from a medical collegehospital (GROUP A) and from PHC (GROUP B). The WHO “Hand Hygiene Knowledge Questionnaire”was used to collect data. Multiple choice questions were given to participants before and after trainingprogram for HH.Results: Eighty & eighty seven HCW were recruited in group A & B respectively. Before HH trainingprogram, both the groups had very few people with good knowledge of HH (8.7% in group A & 5.7% ingroup B). After attending the HH training program, there was significant increase in the number of individualshaving good knowledge of HH practise (52.5% & 35.6 % in group A and B respectively, p<0.001 for thegroups).There was significant increase in the mean scores in both groups after HH training from 57.638+12.52% to 75.66 + 12.45%, p <0.001 in GROUP A & 46.66 +18.7% to 64.59 + 18.97%, p<0.001 in Group B.Conclusions: There was low level of awareness about HH practices in studied population. Regular awarenessprogram must be conducted to improve the knowledge of HH. Medical colleges should consider conductingsuch program for all HCW including PHC HCW at regular interval.

Characteristics of Candida auris Patients at a Tertiary-Care Hospital, 2017–2019, Nairobi, Kenya

Background:Candida auris is of global concern due to its increasing frequency in intensive care units (ICUs), reported resistance to antifungal agents, propensity to cause outbreaks, and persistence in clinical environments. We investigated an increase in C. auris cases in an ICU in Kenya to determine the source of transmission and to control the spread of the disease. Methods: To identify cases, we reviewed laboratory records of patients with blood cultures yielding C. auris and organisms for which it is commonly misidentified by Vitek 2 v 8.01 software (ie, C. haemulonii, C. duobushaemulonii and C. famata) during January 2018–May 2019. We retrospectively reviewed medical charts of C. auris patients to extract information on demographics, underlying conditions, hospital procedures, treatments, and outcomes. We also enhanced infection control efforts by implementing contact precautions, equipment, and environmental disinfection, and hand hygiene training and compliance observations. Results: We identified 32 C. auris patients (Fig. 1). Median patient age was 55 years (IQR, 43–65), and 57% were male. Length of hospitalization before C. auris isolation was 30 days (IQR, 14–36). All had been admitted to the ICU. The most common reasons for admission were sepsis (50%), pneumonia (34%), surgery (25%), and stroke or other neurologic diagnosis (25%). Underlying comorbidities included hypertension (38%), diabetes mellitus (25%), and malignancy (29%). Two patients had HIV. Moreover, 61% of cultures yielded multidrug-resistant bacteria. Also, 33% of the patients had been admitted to this hospital in the preceding 3 months; 21% had been admitted to a hospital outside of Kenya; and 10% had been admitted to another hospital in Kenya in the previous year. Almost all (97%) had a central venous catheter, 45% had an acute dialysis catheter, 66% had an endotracheal tube, and 34% had a tracheostomy, with 69% receiving mechanical ventilation before C. auris isolation. Most (94%) had urinary catheters, 84% had nasogastric tubes, 91% had received total parenteral nutrition, and 75% had received blood products. All patients received broad-spectrum antibiotics and 49% received an antifungal before C. auris isolation. All-cause in-hospital mortality was 64% for the 28 patients whose outcomes were available. Following implementation of a hand hygiene campaign and improved equipment and environmental disinfection, no further cases were identified. Conclusions: We identified C. auris bloodstream infections associated with high all-cause mortality in a Kenyan hospital ICU. All patients had treatments and procedures suggesting severe underlying illness. Enhanced infection control contained the outbreak.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

Candida auris Outbreak Control in Critical Care Units in a Tertiary-Care Hospital in Nairobi, Kenya

Background:Candida auris is an emerging pathogen associated with nosocomial outbreaks. During January to May 2019, 11 invasive cases of C. auris were identified in the intensive care unit (ICU) and high-dependency unit (HDU) at a hospital in Nairobi, Kenya. We report on the interventions implemented to control the outbreak. Methods: Intensified infection prevention and control (IPC) interventions were implemented. All patients infected or colonized with C. auris were placed in single-patient rooms with strict contact precautions. Cleaning of the patient care environment was enhanced by instituting a 3-step procedure of cleaning with soap and water, disinfecting with 0.5% chlorine, and rinsing with water. Glo-Germ gel was used to evaluate the cleaning processes, and percentage of missed surfaces was calculated. Hand hygiene training and compliance observations were conducted to enforce adherence to hand hygiene. The IPC team provided training and observational feedback of IPC to staff, patients, and their families. The IPC interventions were guided by screening activities. To monitor ongoing transmission, a biweekly point-prevalence survey (PPS) was performed to screen all previously negative ICU and HDU patients for C. auris. Furthermore, admission and contact screening were added to guide patient placement. Screening was conducted by collecting a composite swab from the bilateral axilla and groin. Samples were incubated in salt dulcitol broth for 5 days at 40°C then subcultured onto Sabouraud dextrose agar. Colony identification was performed using a Vitek 2 system (bioMérieux). Results: In total, 177 patients were placed in single-patient rooms under contact precautions during May–August 2019. We conducted 123 environmental cleaning observations, and the percentage of missed surfaces decreased from 71% (10 of 14) in June to 7% (1 of 16) in August. Hand hygiene compliance among ICU and HDU staff was 79% (204 of 257) in May, 71% (159 of 223) in June, 73% (170 of 233) in July, and 81% (534 of 657) in August. In total, 283 screening swabs from 234 patients were processed during May–August 2019. Overall, 18 of 88 PPS swabs (20%), 13 of 180 admission screening swabs (7%), and 0 of 15 contact screening swabs (0%) were positive for C. auris. The PPS results showed a rapid decrease in colonization: 6 of 14 (43%) in May, 12 of 54 (22%) in June, 9 of 98 (9%) in July, and 1 of 70 (2%) in August. No new C. auris infections were identified from June to October 2019. Conclusions: The control of C. auris in a hospital outbreak requires multimodal interventions, including enhanced IPC interventions, PPS, admission and contact screening for colonization, rigorous monitoring, and team effort.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

Using an ultraviolet cabinet improves compliance with the World Health Organization\u2019s hand hygiene recommendations by undergraduate medical students: a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundAppropriate hand hygiene (HH) is key to reducing healthcare-acquired infections. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends education and training to improve HH knowledge and compliance. Physicians are ranked among the worst of all healthcare workers for compliant handrubbing with its origin probably being the failure to learn this essential behavior during undergraduate medical studies. This study evaluated if the use of Ultraviolet-cabinets (UVc) for fluorescent-alcohol-based handrubs (AHR) during an undergraduate medical student training improved the compliance rate to the WHO hand hygiene recommendations (completeness of AHR application and HH opportunities).MethodsThis randomized trial compared a HH training with personal feedback (using UVc) to a control group. The first year, the students (2nd degree) were convened by groups (clusters) of 6–9 for a demonstration of the correct execution of WHO procedure. Randomization by cluster was done prior HH training. In the control group, the students hand rubbed under visual supervision of a tutor. In the intervention group after the same visual supervision, completeness of fluorescent-AHR hand application was recorded under UVc and was shown to the student. The intervention group had free access to the UVc until complete application. HH practices were included in simulation sessions for the both groups. One year after (3rd degree), all the students were asked to hand rub with fluorescent-AHR. A tutor (blinded to the study group) assessed the completeness of hand application under UVc and the compliance with the WHO opportunities. Complete application of AHR was defined as fluorescence for all the surfaces of hands and wrists.Results242 students participated (140 in the intervention group and 102 in the control group). One year after the initial training, the rate of complete application of AHR was doubled in the intervention group (60.0% vs. 30.4%, p < 0.001). In a multivariate analysis which included gender, additional HH or UVc training, surgical traineeship and regular use of AHR, the hazard ratio for the intervention was 3.84 (95%CI: 2.09–7.06). The compliance with the HH WHO’s opportunities was increased in the intervention group (58.1% vs. 42.4%, p < 0.018).ConclusionUsing UVc for undergraduate medical students education to hand hygiene improves their technique and compliance with WHO recommendations.

WHO Year of the Nurse and Midwife: More clean and educated hands for all

For the last 10 years, the World Health Organization has been celebrating World Hand Hygiene Day on the 5th of May, bringing together the global healthcare ecosystem to celebrate hand hygiene. This day was created to raise awareness about the importance of hand hygiene in healthcare settings, as well as to focus on a specific annual topic to be highlighted to a global audience. The World Health Assembly designated 2020 as the Year of the Nurse and Midwife, and the slogan of this year's 5th of May was "Nurses and Midwifes: Clean Care is in Your Hands". This 5th of May helped us to highlight the need for increased staffing and hand hygiene training. In this paper we aimed to raise awareness about the global impact linked to adherence to proper hand hygiene practices by nurses and midwives.

Infection prevention and control and antimicrobial stewardship in European long-term care, 2016-2017

Abstract Background Europe's population is ageing. Long-term care facilities (LTCFs) for this vulnerable population are often relatively homelike with low staff-to-resident ratios. In 2016-2017, ECDC coordinated its third point prevalence survey (PPS) of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) and antimicrobial use in European long-term care facilities (LTCFs). It included collection of data on structure and process indicators (SPIs) of infection prevention and control (IPC) and antimicrobial stewardship, to support countries' identification of national and local interventions in LTCFs. Methods In each country, national contacts recruited a convenience sample of LTCFs. National/LTCF PPS teams used a standard protocol that included case definition algorithms (adapted US CDC/SHEA definitions) applied to each resident with signs/symptoms of infection on the PPS day, and questions for LTCF staff on SPIs of IPC and antimicrobial stewardship activities. Denominators indicate the number of responses available for analysis. Results 3,052 LTCFs in 24 EU/EEA countries were recruited, with 102,301 residents included. The prevalence of HAIs (residents with ≥1 HAI) was 3.7%. Although 1,524/1,623 (94%) LTFS had a hand hygiene (HH) protocol, only 1,046/1,585 (66%) LTCFs had organised ≥1 HH training session for care professionals during the previous year. 1,185/1,561 (76%) LTCFs reported IPC training of nursing and paramedical staff. Only 340/1,639 (21%) of LTCFs reported training on appropriate prescribing and 493/1,623 (30%) LTCFs had provided feedback to GPs on antimicrobial consumption. On the PPS day, annual antimicrobial consumption data were available to only 530/1,623 (32%) LTCFs. Conclusions Even in LTCFs with the capacity to perform this PPS, IPC training was non-ubiquitous and antimicrobial stewardship activities, including training, were rarely reported. ECDC encourages EU/EEA countries to recruit LTCFs to participate in future PPSs, to allow them to benchmark HAI rates and practices. Key messages The prevalence of healthcare-associated infections in European long-term care facilities (LTCFs) highlights their requirement for infection prevention and control (IPC) and antimicrobial stewardship. This multi-national point prevalence survey (PPS) indicates that European countries can consider reinforcing IPC, antimicrobial stewardship practices and participation in PPSs in LTCFs.

PENERAPAN CUCI TANGAN PESERTA DIDIK DI RUMAH SAKIT GIGI DAN MULUT UNIVERSITAS GADJAH MADA PROF. SOEDOMO

Background: Dental health professionals have potential infection risks during treatment for the patients. Performing good hand hygiene is very important to prevent the transmission of infections including in dental practice. However, various studies have shown that health workers have low compliance to hand hygiene. Some&#x0D; factors influence the compliance of health workers in hand hygiene practice are knowledge, perceptions, attitudes, workload, and the availability of hand hygiene facilities.&#x0D; Objective: The aim of the study was to improve the compliance of the dental clerkship students’ hand hygiene practice at UGM Prof. Soedomo Dental Hospital.&#x0D; Methods: The research design was action research. Quantitative data was collected during the diagnosing action through a questionnaire on knowledge and perceptions of hand hygiene and observation of hand hygiene compliance among 35 students, focus group discussion (FGD) on four students, and evaluating the hand hygiene&#x0D; facilities for students. The data collected in initial stage was used to determine the planning action, taking action, and evaluation stage.&#x0D; Results: The hand hygiene compliance of the students increased by 60% after dissemination of hand hygiene standard procedures, hand hygiene training, improving hand hygiene facilities, and increasing the commitment using consent forms before treating patients. The result of the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test showed a Z value of -4.583 with a p-value of 0.000 (p&lt;0.05).&#x0D; Conclusion: It can be concluded that the hand hygiene compliance of clerical students in UGM Prof. Soedomo Dental Hospital increase significantly by the policy and management interventions.&#x0D; &#x0D;

Impact of hand hygiene intervention: a comparative study in health care facilities in Dodoma region, Tanzania using WHO methodology

BackgroundCompliance with guidelines on hand hygiene (HH) is pivotal to prevent and control health-care associated infections and contributes to mitigating antimicrobial resistance. A baseline assessment in Dodoma region, Tanzania in March 2018 showed inadequate HH levels across health care facilities. We evaluated the impact of training in HH as part of a water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) interventions of “Maji kwa Afya ya Jamii” (MKAJI) project.MethodsA comparative HH assessment was conducted in June 2019 involving health care facilities under MKAJI project (n = 87 from which 98 units were assessed) vs non-MKAJI facilities (n = 85 from which 99 units were assessed). Irrespective of MKAJI interventional status, baseline assessment in March 2018 were compared to re-assessment in June 2019 in all health care facility units (unpaired comparison: 261 vs 236 units, respectively), and in facilities assessed in both surveys (paired comparison: 191 versus 191 units, respectively). The ‘WHO HH Self-Assessment Framework Tool, 2010’ with five indicators each counting 100 points was used. The cumulative scores stratified each health facility’s unit into inadequate (0–125), basic (126–250), intermediate (251–375) or advanced (376–500) HH level (score). The HH compliance rates were also assessed and compared.ResultsThe overall post-intervention median HH score [interquartile range (IQR)] was 187.5 (112.5–260). MKAJI health facilities had significantly higher median HH scores (IQR) [190 (120–262.5)] compared with non-MKAJI facilities [165 (95–230); p = 0.038]. Similarly, the HH compliance rate of ≥51% was significantly higher in MKAJI than non-MKAJI facilities [56.1% versus 30.3%; chi2 = 13.39, p < 0.001]. However, the recommended WHO compliance rate of ≥81% was only reached by 6.1 and 3.0% units of MKAJI and non-MKAJI facilities, respectively. Both paired and unpaired comparisons during baseline and re-assessment surveys showed increase in HH level from inadequate to basic level.ConclusionThe overall HH level after the combined WASH and training intervention was at basic level. Higher median HH scores (IQR) and HH compliance rates were evident in health facilities of the MKAJI project, underscoring the impact of the intervention and the potential value of a national roll-out.

Understanding hand hygiene behaviour in the intensive care unit to inform interventions: an interview study

BackgroundImproving hand hygiene (HH) compliance is one of the most important, but elusive, goals of infection control. The purpose of this study was to use the capability (C), opportunity (O), motivation (M), and behaviour (B; COM-B) model and the theoretical domains framework (TDF) to gain an understanding of the barriers and enablers of HH behaviours in an intensive care unit (ICU) in order to identify specific interventions to improve HH compliance.MethodsA semi-structured interview schedule was developed based upon the COM-B model. This schedule was used to interview a total of 26 ICU staff: 12 ICU nurses, 11 anaesthetic specialist registrars, and three anaesthetic senior house officers.ResultsParticipants were confident in their capabilities to carry out appropriate HH behaviours. The vast majority of participants reported having the necessary knowledge and skills, and believed they were capable of carrying out appropriate HH behaviours. Social influence was regarded as being important in encouraging HH compliance by the interviewees- particularly by nurses. The participants were motivated to carry out HH behaviours, and it was recognised that HH was an important part of their job and is important in preventing infection. It is recommended that staff are provided with targeted HH training, in which individuals receive direct and individualised feedback on actual performance and are provided guidance on how to address deficiencies in HH compliance at the bedside at the time at which the HH behaviour is performed. Modelling of appropriate HH behaviours by senior leaders is also suggested, particularly by senior doctors. Finally, appropriate levels of staffing are a factor that must be considered if HH compliance is to be improved.ConclusionsThis study has demonstrated that short interviews with ICU staff, founded on appropriate behavioural change frameworks, can provide an understanding of HH behaviour. This understanding can then be applied to design interventions appropriately tailored to the needs of a specific unit, which will have an increased likelihood of improving HH compliance.

The Knowledge and Perception of Hand Hygiene Among Health Care Workers in Clinical Settings in Khartoum State - Sudan

Objective This study conducted to assess health care practitioners’ knowledge and perceptions of hand hygiene among health professional working in clinical settings in Khartoum State - Sudan. with the specific objective of determining the association between their stance on hand hygiene and the general demographic characteristics of these health-care professionals. Methodology This is a cross-sectional study conducted between July and November 2017 using a modified form of WHO questionnaire for knowledge and perception that was included 22 items was sent online to health care workers via social media. The data obtained entered and analyzed by SPSS version 24. Chi-square and test of independence were used as a test of significance. A p-value of &lt; 0.05 was considered statistically significant for all purposes. Result 437 hospital staff were responded to the questionnaire. (99.3%) was found to have good knowledge. 197(45.2%) had good perception and 239(54.8%) had fair perception. Formal hand hygiene training was found to have no association with knowledge levels of hand hygiene, but the fair perception was higher in the respondents who didn’t receive formal training. Conclusion The present study highlights the hand hygiene knowledge and perception. Most health care workers were found to have good knowledge, and the majority was found to have a fair perception. Formal hand hygiene training courses were found to have no association with knowledge but it may be reflected in practice. The importance of training sessions regarding hand hygiene was noticed in the perception level.

Cross-sectional study to assess knowledge and practice of hand hygiene among 1st year Bachelor of Naturopathy and Yogic Science students

Background: Hand hygiene is recognized as the leading measure to prevent health care associated infections. WHO has introduced evidence-based guideline on hand hygiene practice among healthcare professionals. But, knowledge and practice of hand hygiene remains poor among students. Therefore, the present study was planned to study knowledge and practice of hand hygiene among Bachelor of Naturopathy and Yogic Science (BNYS) students.Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 79 first year BNYS students. Knowledge of students was assessed using WHO hand hygiene questionnaire; practices were evaluated by using another self-structured questionnaire. Descriptive statistics was used to calculate percentages for knowledge and practice of hand hygiene among study subjects.Results: 35 (44%) of the students had moderate level of knowledge and 25 (32%) students had poor knowledge of hand hygiene. 73 (92%) students had correct knowledge that hand hygiene action before touching a patient prevented transmission of germs to the patient. Only 11 (14%) had knowledge that artificial nails should be avoided. Only 19 (24%) students were aware that hand rubbing was required before palpation of abdomen. Only 34 (43%) students adhered to hand hygiene practices regularly.Conclusions: Hand hygiene is an important tool for prevention of hospital acquired infections. The overall knowledge and practice of hand hygiene was not good among study subjects and a few numbers of students had attended formal training about hand hygiene. These findings indicate that the BNYS students require increased emphasis on hand hygiene education and training in their curriculum.

Hand Hygiene Practices, Attitudes, and Microbial Hand Populations of Practicing Doctors of Chiropractic

ObjectiveHand hygiene practice is important in health care settings to reduce the spread of infection. To date, no hand hygiene study has been conducted with doctors of chiropractic that included microbiological analysis of hand specimens. The primary objective of this study was to examine the relationship between self-reported hand hygiene practices and attitudes of chiropractors with the number and type of pathogenic bacteria and yeast present on their hands. MethodsIn this cross-sectional study, a microbiological analysis of the chiropractor's dominant hand was performed along with completion of a survey concerning practices and attitudes regarding hand hygiene. The relationship between self-reported measures with laboratory findings was conducted using generalized linear modeling. ResultsParticipants who responded to the survey indicated that hand hygiene was important, and most reported performing hand hygiene before and/or after patient contact. However, 7 (26.9%) participants had multidrug-resistant bacteria isolated from their hands. There was no correlation between the survey responses and hand specimens with the exception of the number of handwashing episodes. From the hand specimens, 16 (45.7%) coagulase-negative staphylococci isolates were oxacillin resistant, and 9 (25.7%) were multidrug resistant. ConclusionThis study found that like other health care workers, chiropractors had antimicrobial-resistant bacteria on their hands, some of which were multidrug resistant. Multidrug resistant bacteria have the potential to be transferred to patients and patient contact surfaces. These findings indicate that chiropractic offices could play a role in health care-associated infections. Formal hand hygiene training should be included as part of the chiropractic education curriculum and continuing education for doctors of chiropractic.

To investigate the association between the health literacy and hand hygiene practices of the older adults to help them fight against infectious diseases in Hong Kong

Proper hand hygiene helps prevent infectious diseases, while health literacy plays a critical role in preventive health behaviors. It remains unclear as to why proper hand hygiene practices cannot be sustained and what role health literacy plays in older adults fight against infectious diseases. A convenience sample of 433 old adults aged 65 and above was recruited. Their hygiene practices and health literacy were evaluated using a structured questionnaire adopted from the Centre for Health Protection and the Chinese version of the HLS-Asia-Q questionnaire. The percentage distribution of the hand hygiene performance, from always to never, was 18%-10%. A majority 63.28% (274) of them were classified as having inadequate health literacy (0-25), while a meager 1.62% (7) of them as having excellent health literacy (42.01-50). The Spearman correlation showed a significant positive relationship (P < 0.05) between the participants' health literacy and their hand hygiene practices. Health literacy and hand hygiene are positively related in helping the older adults fight against infectious diseases. To sustain proper hand hygiene practices is to provide frequent hand hygiene training to the older adults.

Hand Hygiene Practices and Training Gap in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit at Coastal Karnataka India

Background: Non-adherence to hand hygiene practices is a well-known factor contributing to healthcareassociated infections in any healthcare setting. Mere knowledge of such practices doesn’t guarantee the compliance to the practices by healthcare personnel. In this study we explored the quantum of adherence to handhygiene practices, the opportunity missed, the steps and the duration to be followed for hand hygiene practices and the training gap among the healthcare providers. Methodology: A six-month cross-sectional study using a mixed-method approach of observations, interview and feedback mechanism is used to find the effectiveness of hand hygiene practices and any training gap to prevent healthcare-associated infections. Observations for two thousand opportunities for hand washing and written interview of 40 healthcare workers is carried out on hand hygiene practices at a neonatal intensive care unit of coastal Karnataka, India. Results: The hand hygiene practices were as low as 0% observed while performing an non-invasive activity like clearing an alarm at the bedside. There is a gap found in the duration of hand-washing practices, hand hygiene before and after any care activity is performed on the neonate. This gap resulted in the spread of healthcare-associated infections. Conclusion: During the infections control training emphasis should also be given on the opportunities and hands on practices of hand hygiene.

Hand Hygiene Practices and Training Gap in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit at Coastal Karnataka India

Background: Non-adherence to hand hygiene practices is a well-known factor contributing to healthcareassociated infections in any healthcare setting. Mere knowledge of such practices doesn’t guaran tee the compliance to the practices by healthcare personnel. In this study we explored the quantum of adherence to hand hygiene practices, the opportunity missed, the steps and the duration to be followed for hand hygiene practices and the training gap among the healthcare providers. Methodology: A six-month cross-sectional study using a mixed-method approach of observations, interview and feedback mechanism is used to find the effectiveness of hand hygiene practices and any training gap to prevent healthcare-associated infections. Observations for two thousand opportunities for hand washing and written interview of 40 healthcare workers is carried out on hand hygiene practices at a neonatal intensive care unit of coastal Karnataka, India. Results: The hand hygiene practices are as low as with nearly zero percent observed while with performing non-invasive activity like clearing an alarm at the bedside. There is a gap found in the duration of handwashing practices, hand hygiene before and after any care activity is performed on the neonate. This gap resulted in the spread of healthcare-associated infections. Conclusion: During the infections control training emphasis should also be given on the opportunities and hands on practices of hand hygiene.

Analysis of Compliance and Barriers for Hand Hygiene Practices among Health Care Workers during COVID-19 Pandemic Management in Tertiary Care Hospital of India—An Important Step for Second Wave Preparedness

Introduction: Hands of health care workers play an important part in infection transmission in a healthcare setting infections. Even though it is a simple and effective procedure, it is many times ignored by the health care workers (HCWs) due to lack of knowledge and interest, time constraints, skin irritation, understaffing, etc. There are no specific drugs and vaccines available for COVID-19 pandemic management, so as control measures, hand hygiene is an essential measure. It will be helpful even for the second wave preparedness. So this study was planned for analysis of barriers and practices of hand hygiene among health care workers which determine the adherence of hand hygiene in medical practice. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study designed during COVID-19 pandemic management to analyze the barriers and knowledge, attitude and practices in health care workers for hand hygiene. Semi-structured questionnaires based study based on previous experience of seasonal flu outbreak was make to know barriers as well as to analyze the knowledge, attitude and practices of Health care workers. 215 participants were enrolled who were doctors, resident doctors, nurses, lab technicians, ward boys and food distributors. Results: The “Barriers” related questions’ analysis showed that hand hygiene facilities, with the supply of soap, hand rub, basins with adequate as well as clean water, are available at various places in the Hospital. In knowledge related questions, major gaps are found in 5 moments of hand hygiene and regarding aspects of alcohol-based hand-rub. Majority HCWs show a good attitude towards questions that hand hygiene is an important thing to do along with other works and they feel frustrated when others or they themselves omit hand hygiene. But the attitude toward hand hygiene when hands are not visibly soiled and when working with gloved hand showed a wrong attitude. There is a major gap in practices of hand hygiene. The majority feel hand hygiene is difficult due to work pressure, sometimes they forgot, they feel it difficult to adhere due to more steps during an emergency. Discussion: Hand hygiene is an essential part of COVID-19 pandemic management. Less compliance was observed due to a lack of knowledge and awareness. Such ignorance leads to an increase in Hospital-acquired infection. Conclusion: Good preparedness by Government and Institute for supplying adequate hand hygiene facilities in the work area for health care workers. But there were few gaps found in knowledge and attitude-related questionnaires and major gaps in practices were found which should be corrected by repeated training, awareness programs, demonstrations for hand hygiene and hands-on training. Conducting Periodic Webinar can be the most useful, convenient and safe method to provide training during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Hand Hygiene and Nutrition Training for Semi-Urban and Rural Primary School Students in Haliliye District of Şanliurfa

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Hand Hygiene and Nutrition Training for Semi-Urban and Rural Primary School Students in Haliliye District of Şanliurfa

Perceptions of Nigerian healthcare workers towards hand hygiene: a qualitative study.

Introductionhand hygiene (HH) is an effective measure to reduce healthcare-associated infections and the growing burden of antimicrobial resistance. There is a need to understand the perceptions of healthcare workers towards its practice and the use of alcohol-based hand rubs (ABHR) to make recommendations to promote HH. Our study aimed to explore the perceptions of Nigerian healthcare workers towards HH and the use and availability of ABHR to suggest potential interventions to improve its practice as qualitative evidence in this field is limited in Nigeria.Methodsa qualitative study design was utilized to understand the perceptions of healthcare workers towards HH and the use of ABHR at Adeoyo Maternity Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria. Purposive sampling was used to recruit nineteen healthcare workers who were interviewed. Thematic content analysis was used to analyze the data generated.Resultsfive themes emerged including discrepancies in what constitutes HH practice as participants, motivation for HH practice, a good knowledge of timing as regards practice, barriers to good practice and evidence of poor practice.Conclusionwhile many healthcare workers know about HH and self-reported compliance towards it seems to be high, knowledge gaps, lack of resources, absence of regulations and poor working conditions were impediments to the successful implementation of HH practices. We recommend that hospitals institute well-articulated HH regulations, continuous education and training of healthcare workers. Hospitals should also ensure adequate provision of resources for hand hygiene and institute a continuous monitoring and feedback program to evaluate compliance with regulations.