Recently, there has been interest in using the velocity associated with˙VO2max (v˙VO2max) in the prescription of training intensity for distance runners. v˙VO2max, which is defined as the treadmill velocity at which ˙VO2max is elicited in an incremental test, is said to be the lowest velocity that will elicit ˙VO2max and, as such, to represent the ideal (i.e., lowest) intensity when the object is to sustain ˙VO2max in training. We have found that ˙VO2max is attained after about 4 min atv˙VO2max, and sustained for about 1 min. The purpose of this study was to determine if ˙VO2max could be elicited at velocities below v˙VO2max. Six trained male distance runners (mean ± SD: age 24 ± 4 yr, ht 177 ± 7 cm, wt 70± 6 kg) participated. In incremental tests, their ˙VO2max(4.31 ± 0.83 l·min-1, 62 ± 9 ml·kg-1·min-1) was elicited at 327 ± 27 m·min-1. They ran to exhaustion at 92% of thisv˙VO2max. Peak ˙VO2 in these constant velocity tests (4.56 ± 0.56 l·min-1) did not differ (t5 = 1.06, p = 0.34) from the incremental value. That is, ˙VO2max was elicited in the constant velocity tests. Athletes attained ˙VO2max after 467 ± 127 s. Time to exhaustion was 620 ± 168 s. It is concluded that it is inappropriate to describe v˙VO2max as the lowest velocity that will elicit ˙VO2max. Furthermore, since the athletes sustained ˙VO2max for more than 2½ min in the runs at 92% of v˙VO2max, a slower pace (i.e., a pace below v˙VO2max) may be indicated when the goal in the training session is to sustain ˙VO2max for an extended time.
Read full abstract