Studies of user-response to visual aspects of forests have generally been focused on single stands or on differences in preference within a sample of forest stands, and little attention has been paid to the effects of contrast and visual interaction between forest stands. Here we describe a pilot study on public response to the occurence of many vis-à-vis few visually different forest stands along two trails. A visually distinguishable forest stand is defined as an area of vegetation visually different in character from surrounding or adjacent vegetation. Two trails, each 2.5 km long, were laid out in a forest, one through eight visual forest stands and the other through three. After having walked each trail, 16 subjects made assessments of trail length, of time spent traversing it, and of the visual impression of the trail environment. They also assessed the suitability of the trail for the practise of typical open-air, recreational activities. The respondents made significantly more errors in assessing time and distance when judging the trail through few visual forest stands. The trail through many visual forest stands was considered to be decidedly more varied. The urge or willingness to engage in recreational activities was dependent on whether there were few or many visual stands. We have called the kind of visual variation we are dealing with the Forest Visual Oppurtunity Spectrum (FVOS), and it is our view that alternatives for the future planning and management of visual variation in a forest are derivable from documentation of the Forest Visual Oppurtunity Spectrum. At present we are attempting to establish criteria for the identification of visual vegetation stands in accordance with lay response.
Read full abstract