G Protein-coupled Receptors Trafficking Research Articles

Gαs regulates the post-endocytic sorting of G protein-coupled receptors.

The role of Gαs in G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signalling at the cell surface is well established. Recent evidence has revealed the presence of Gαs on endosomes and its capacity to elicit GPCR-promoted signalling from this intracellular compartment. Here, we report an unconventional role for Gαs in the endocytic sorting of GPCRs to lysosomes. Cellular depletion of Gαs specifically delays the lysosomal degradation of GPCRs by disrupting the transfer of GPCRs into the intraluminal vesicles (ILVs) of multivesicular bodies (MVBs). We show that Gαs interacts with GASP-1 and dysbindin, two key proteins that serve as linkers between GPCRs and the ESCRT (endosomal sorting complex required for transport) machinery involved in receptor sorting into ILVs. Our findings reveal that Gαs plays a role in both GPCR signalling and trafficking pathways, providing another piece in the intertwining molecular network between these processes.

Differential Regulation of Endosomal GPCR/β-Arrestin Complexes and Trafficking by MAPK

β-Arrestins are signaling adaptors that bind to agonist-occupied G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and target them for endocytosis; however, the mechanisms regulating receptor/β-arrestin complexes and trafficking in endosomes, remain ill defined. Here we show, in live cells, differential dynamic regulation of endosomal bradykinin B2 receptor (B2R) complexes with either β-arrestin-1 or -2. We find a novel role for MAPK in the B2R/β-arrestin-2 complex formation, receptor trafficking and signaling mediated by an ERK1/2 regulatory motif in the hinge domain of the rat β-arrestin-2 (PET(178)P), but not rat β-arrestin-1 (PER(177)P). While the ERK1/2 regulatory motif is conserved between rat and mouse β-arrestin-2, it is surprisingly not conserved in human β-arrestin-2 (PEK(178)P). However, mutation of lysine 178 to threonine is sufficient to confer MAPK sensitivity to the human β-arrestin-2. Furthermore, substitution for a phosphomimetic residue in both the rat and the human β-arrestin-2 (T/K178D) significantly stabilizes B2R/β-arrestin complexes in endosomes, delays receptor recycling to the plasma membrane and maintains intracellular MAPK signaling. Similarly, the endosomal trafficking of β2-adrenergic, angiotensin II type 1 and vasopressin V2 receptors was altered by the β-arrestin-2 T178D mutant. Our findings unveil a novel subtype specific mode of MAPK-dependent regulation of β-arrestins in intracellular trafficking and signaling of GPCRs, and suggest differential endosomal receptor/β-arrestin-2 signaling roles among species.

The α‐arrestin ARRDC3 regulates ubiquitin‐independent ALIX‐mediated GPCR lysosomal sorting (783.2)

Endosomal sorting and lysosomal degradation of G‐protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) maintains cell homeostasis by attenuating receptor signaling and desensitizing cells to persistent activation. GPCR lysosomal sorting defects cause aberrant cellular responses that contribute to many diseases, including chronic inflammation and cancer metastasis. Here, we demonstrate that the human α‐arrestin ARRDC3 regulates the lysosomal degradation of protease‐activated receptor‐1 (PAR1), a GPCR for thrombin. PAR1 belongs to a subset of GPCRs, including the purinergic receptor P2Y1, that are sorted to lysosomes independent of receptor ubiquitination. Instead, PAR1 and P2Y1 are targeted to lysosomes by YPXnL motifs that are bound by the ESCRT adaptor protein ALIX. ARRDC3 is required for PAR1 degradation, but not for the degradation of ubiquitinated receptors. ARRDC3 regulates ALIX interaction with PAR1 and the ESCRT‐III protein CHMP4. Intriguingly, depletion of ARRDC3 or ALIX blocks recovery of thrombin‐induced dephosphorylation of Yap1, an effector of the Hippo cell proliferation pathway, suggesting that GPCR degradation is important for regulation of Hippo signaling. This study reveals a novel role for α‐arrestins in the ubiquitin‐independent, ALIX‐mediated endosomal trafficking of GPCRs, and demonstrates the importance of lysosomal sorting in the regulation of GPCR‐mediated proliferative signaling.Grant Funding Source: Supported by NIH NIGMS R01 GM090689

Common α2A and α2C adrenergic receptor polymorphisms do not affect plasma membrane trafficking

Various naturally occurring polymorphic forms of human G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have been identified and linked to diverse pathological diseases, including receptors for vasopressin type 2 (nephrogenic diabetes insipidus) and gonadotropin releasing hormone (hypogonadotropic hypogonadism). In most cases, polymorphic amino acid mutations disrupt protein folding, altering receptor function as well as plasma membrane expression. Other pathological GPCR variants have been found that do not alter receptor function, but instead affect only plasma membrane trafficking (e.g., delta opiate and histamine type 1 receptors). Thus, altered membrane trafficking with retained receptor function may be another mechanism causing polymorphic GPCR dysfunction. Two common human α2A and α2C adrenergic receptor (AR) variants have been identified (α2A N251K and α2C Δ322-325 ARs), but pharmacological analysis of ligand binding and second messenger signaling has not consistently demonstrated altered receptor function. However, possible alterations in plasma membrane trafficking have not been investigated. We utilized a systematic approach previously developed for the study of GPCR trafficking motifs and accessory proteins to assess whether these α2 AR variants affected intracellular trafficking or plasma membrane expression. By combining immunofluorescent microscopy, glycosidic processing analysis, and quantitative fluorescent-activated cell sorting (FACS), we demonstrate that neither variant receptor had altered intracellular localization, glycosylation, nor plasma membrane expression compared to wild-type α2 ARs. Therefore, pathopharmacological properties of α2A N251K and α2C Δ322-325 ARs do not appear to be due to altered receptor pharmacology or plasma membrane trafficking, but may involve interactions with other intracellular signaling cascades or proteins.

RETRACTED: Agonist-Induced GPCR Shedding from the Ciliary Surface Is Dependent on ESCRT-III and VPS4

Membrane trafficking of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is crucial for temporal and spatial control of cell-surface GPCR signaling. Receptor internalization is a well-documented method cells use for regulating a wide variety of GPCRs following their exposure to agonists. We report that, upon agonist stimulation, a GPCR called vasoactive intestinal peptide receptor 2 (VPAC2) is shed, rather than being internalized, in vitro and in vivo, from the membrane of primary cilia--solitary hair-like organelles that project from the cell surface. VPAC2 is released into the extracellular milieu in the form of ciliary ectosomes that are devoid of exosome markers. The agonist-induced VPAC2 shedding is selective, as shown by the fact that other ciliary membrane proteins including two ciliary GPCRs are not shed with VPAC2. VPAC2 ectosome shedding is dependent on several components of endosomal sorting complexes required for transport (ESCRT), including a subset of ESCRT-III, VPS4, and LIP5. Agonist-stimulated VPAC2 is important for ciliary-ectosome generation because it allows VPS4 and LIP5 to transiently accumulate in primary cilia. Shedding of VPAC2 from the ciliary surface results in termination of intracellular VPAC2 signaling. Agonist-induced GPCR shedding from the ciliary surface may represent an additional mode of GPCR trafficking and signal regulation.

CNIH4 Interacts with Newly Synthesized GPCR and Controls Their Export from the Endoplasmic Reticulum

The molecular mechanisms regulating G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) trafficking from their site of synthesis in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to their site of function (the cell surface) remain poorly characterized. Using a bioluminescence resonance energy transfer-based proteomic screen, we identified a novel GPCR-interacting protein; the human cornichon homologue 4 (CNIH4). This previously uncharacterized protein is localized in the early secretory pathway where it interacts with members of the 3 family of GPCRs. Both overexpression and knockdown expression of CNIH4 caused the intracellular retention of GPCRs, indicating that this ER-resident protein plays an important role in GPCR export. Overexpression of CNIH4 at low levels rescued the maturation and cell surface expression of an intracellularly retained mutant form of the β2-adrenergic receptor, further demonstrating a positive role of CNIH4 in GPCR trafficking. Taken with the co-immunoprecipitation of CNIH4 with Sec23 and Sec24, components of the COPII coat complex responsible for ER export, these data suggest that CNIH4 acts as a cargo-sorting receptor, recruiting GPCRs into COPII vesicles.

REEPs Are Membrane Shaping Adapter Proteins That Modulate Specific G Protein-Coupled Receptor Trafficking by Affecting ER Cargo Capacity

Receptor expression enhancing proteins (REEPs) were identified by their ability to enhance cell surface expression of a subset of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), specifically GPCRs that have proven difficult to express in heterologous cell systems. Further analysis revealed that they belong to the Yip (Ypt-interacting protein) family and that some REEP subtypes affect ER structure. Yip family comparisons have established other potential roles for REEPs, including regulation of ER-Golgi transport and processing/neuronal localization of cargo proteins. However, these other potential REEP functions and the mechanism by which they selectively enhance GPCR cell surface expression have not been clarified. By utilizing several REEP family members (REEP1, REEP2, and REEP6) and model GPCRs (α2A and α2C adrenergic receptors), we examined REEP regulation of GPCR plasma membrane expression, intracellular processing, and trafficking. Using a combination of immunolocalization and biochemical methods, we demonstrated that this REEP subset is localized primarily to ER, but not plasma membranes. Single cell analysis demonstrated that these REEPs do not specifically enhance surface expression of all GPCRs, but affect ER cargo capacity of specific GPCRs and thus their surface expression. REEP co-expression with α2 adrenergic receptors (ARs) revealed that this REEP subset interacts with and alter glycosidic processing of α2C, but not α2A ARs, demonstrating selective interaction with cargo proteins. Specifically, these REEPs enhanced expression of and interacted with minimally/non-glycosylated forms of α2C ARs. Most importantly, expression of a mutant REEP1 allele (hereditary spastic paraplegia SPG31) lacking the carboxyl terminus led to loss of this interaction. Thus specific REEP isoforms have additional intracellular functions besides altering ER structure, such as enhancing ER cargo capacity, regulating ER-Golgi processing, and interacting with select cargo proteins. Therefore, some REEPs can be further described as ER membrane shaping adapter proteins.

Functional proteomics, human genetics and cancer biology of GIPC family members.

GIPC1, GIPC2 and GIPC3 consist of GIPC homology 1 (GH1) domain, PDZ domain and GH2 domain. The regions around the GH1 and GH2 domains of GIPC1 are involved in dimerization and interaction with myosin VI (MYO6), respectively. The PDZ domain of GIPC1 is involved in interactions with transmembrane proteins [IGF1R, NTRK1, ADRB1, DRD2, TGFβR3 (transforming growth factorβ receptor type III), SDC4, SEMA4C, LRP1, NRP1, GLUT1, integrin α5 and VANGL2], cytosolic signaling regulators (APPL1 and RGS19) and viral proteins (HBc and HPV-18 E6). GIPC1 is an adaptor protein with dimerizing ability that loads PDZ ligands as cargoes for MYO6-dependent endosomal trafficking. GIPC1 is required for cell-surface expression of IGF1R and TGFβR3. GIPC1 is also required for integrin recycling during cell migration, angiogenesis and cytokinesis. On early endosomes, GIPC1 assembles receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) and APPL1 for activation of PI3K–AKT signaling, and G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and RGS19 for attenuation of inhibitory Gα signaling. GIPC1 upregulation in breast, ovarian and pancreatic cancers promotes tumor proliferation and invasion, whereas GIPC1 downregulation in cervical cancer with human papillomavirus type 18 infection leads to resistance to cytostatic transforming growth factorβ signaling. GIPC2 is downregulated in acute lymphocytic leukemia owing to epigenetic silencing, while Gipc2 is upregulated in estrogen-induced mammary tumors. Somatic mutations of GIPC2 occur in malignant melanoma, and colorectal and ovarian cancers. Germ-line mutations of the GIPC3 or MYO6 gene cause nonsyndromic hearing loss. As GIPC proteins are involved in trafficking, signaling and recycling of RTKs, GPCRs, integrins and other transmembrane proteins, dysregulation of GIPCs results in human pathologies, such as cancer and hereditary deafness.

Minireview: Ubiquitination-regulated G Protein-Coupled Receptor Signaling and Trafficking

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the largest and most diverse superfamily of membrane proteins and mediate most cellular responses to hormones and neurotransmitters. Posttranslational modifications are considered the main regulators of all GPCRs. In addition to phosphorylation, glycosylation, and palmitoylation, increasing evidence as reviewed here reveals that ubiquitination also regulates the magnitude and temporospatial aspects of GPCR signaling. Posttranslational protein modification by ubiquitin is a key molecular mechanism governing proteins degradation. Ubiquitination mediates the covalent conjugation of ubiquitin, a highly conserved polypeptide of 76 amino acids, to protein substrates. This process is catalyzed by 3 enzymes acting in tandem: an E1, ubiquitin-activating enzyme; an E2, ubiquitin-carrying enzyme; and an E3, ubiquitin ligase. Ubiquitination is counteracted by deubiquitinating enzymes that deconjugate ubiquitin-modified proteins and rescue the substrate from proteasomal degradation. Although ubiquitination is known to target many GPCRs for lysosomal or proteasomal degradation, emerging findings define novel roles for the basal status of ubiquitination and for rapid deubiquitination and transubiquitination controlling cell surface expression and cellular responsiveness of some GPCRs. In this review, we highlight the classical and novel roles of ubiquitin in the regulation of GPCR function, signaling, and trafficking.

Cilia, tubby mice, and obesity

Primary cilia have been previously linked to the central regulation of satiety. The tubby mouse is characterized by maturity-onset obesity and blindness. A recent paper demonstrates molecular defects in trafficking of ciliary GPCRs in the central neurons of tubby mice, underscoring the role of ciliary signaling in the pathogenesis of this monogenic obesity syndrome.Please see related Research article by Li et al., http://www.ciliajournal.com/content/1/1/21

β-arrestin 2 regulates Aβ generation and γ-secretase activity in Alzheimer’s disease

Deficits in several neurotransmitter systems are characteristic features of the brains of AD patients. The majority of neurotransmitters communicate information to cells via G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) or 7-transmembrane receptors (7TMRs). It has recently been appreciated that a small family of multifunctional GPCR regulatory known as the β-arrestins which play an almost universal role in facilitating traditional GPCR desensitization, are also capable of initiating distinct signals in their own right, conveying receptor subtype-specific signaling events. These signals are often both spatially and temporally distinct, and result in unique cellular and physiological or pathophysiological consequences. As mediators of GPCR desensitization, trafficking and cell signaling, the β-arrestins provide a putative basis to understand GPCR dysfunction in AD. Here, we report that β-arrestin 2 levels are elevated in two independent cohorts of patients with AD. Genetic deletion of Arrb2 (β-arrestin 2) reduces accumulation of the amyloid-β (Aβ) peptide in an AD mouse model. Consistent with these observations, endogenous murine Aβ generation is also reduced in Arrb2-/- mice. Elucidation of the mechanism of the β-arrestin 2-mediated effect on Aβ levels indicates that recruitment of β-arrestin 2 to two GPCRs implicated in the pathogenesis of AD, GPR3 and the β2-adrenergic receptor (β2-AR), is required for the promotion of Aβ release. Collectively, these studies identify β-arrestin 2 as a novel avenue for targeting amyloid pathology and GPCR dysfunction in AD.

Rab8 Modulates Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor Subtype 1 Intracellular Trafficking and Signaling in a Protein Kinase C-Dependent Manner

Metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) are G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) that are activated by glutamate, the primary excitatory neurotransmitter in the CNS. Alterations in glutamate receptor signaling are implicated in neuropathologies such as Alzheimer's disease, ischemia, and Huntington's disease among others. Group 1 mGluRs (mGluR1 and mGluR5) are primarily coupled to Gα(q/11) leading to the activation of phospholipase C and the formation of diacylglycerol and inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate, which results in the release of intracellular calcium stores and protein kinase C (PKC) activation. Desensitization, endocytosis, and recycling are major mechanisms of GPCR regulation, and the intracellular trafficking of GPCRs is linked to the Rab family of small G proteins. Rab8 is a small GTPase that is specifically involved in the regulation of secretory/recycling vesicles, modulation of the actin cytoskeleton, and cell polarity. Rab8 has been shown to regulate the synaptic delivery of AMPA receptors during long-term potentiation and during constitutive receptor recycling. We show here that Rab8 interacts with the C-terminal tail of mGluR1a in an agonist-dependent manner and plays a role in regulating of mGluR1a signaling and intracellular trafficking in human embryonic kidney 293 cells. Specifically, Rab8 expression attenuates mGluR1a-mediated inositol phosphate formation and calcium release from mouse neurons in a PKC-dependent manner, while increasing cell surface mGluR1a expression via decreased receptor endocytosis. These experiments provide us with an understanding of the role Rabs play in coordinated regulation of mGluR1a and how this impacts mGluR1a signaling.

Tubby is required for trafficking G protein-coupled receptors to neuronal cilia

BackgroundTubby is the founding member of the tubby-like family of proteins. The naturally occurring tubby mutation in mice causes retinitis pigmentosa, hearing loss and obesity. Tubby has been proposed to function as an accessory factor in ciliary trafficking. We directly examined a role for tubby in ciliary trafficking in vivo.MethodsWe used immunofluoresence labeling to examine the subcellular localization of rhodopsin, somatostatin receptor 3 (SSTR3) and melanin concentrating hormone receptor 1 (MCHR1), all of which are G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR), in the retina and brain of wild type (WT) and tubby mutant mice.ResultsIn tubby mouse retina, rhodopsin is not fully transported across the connecting cilia to the outer segments with ensuing photoreceptor degeneration. In the tubby mouse brain, SSTR3 and MCHR1 fail to localize at the neuronal primary cilia in regions where these receptors play critical roles in neural signaling. The tubby mutant does not manifest a generalized defect in ciliogenesis or protein trafficking.ConclusionsTubby plays a critical role in trafficking select GPCRs to the cilia. This role is reminiscent of tubby-like proteins 1 and 3, which have been proposed to facilitate trafficking of rhodopsin and select GPCRs in photoreceptors and the developing neural tube, respectively. Thus tubby-like proteins may be generally involved in transciliary trafficking of GPCRs.

Ubiquitination of G Protein-Coupled Receptors: Functional Implications and Drug Discovery

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) comprise the largest and most diverse family of signaling receptors and control a vast array of physiological responses. Modulating the signaling responses of GPCRs therapeutically is important for the treatment of various diseases, and discovering new aspects of GPCR signal regulation is critical for future drug development. Post-translational modifications are integral to the regulation of GPCR function. In addition to phosphorylation, many GPCRs are reversibly modified with ubiquitin. Ubiquitin is covalently attached to lysine residues within the cytoplasmic domains of GPCRs by ubiquitin ligases and removed by ubiquitin-specific proteases. In many cases, ubiquitin functions as a sorting signal that facilitates trafficking of mammalian GPCRs from endosomes to lysosomes for degradation, but not all GPCRs use this pathway. Moreover, there are distinct types of ubiquitin conjugations that are known to serve diverse functions in controlling a wide range of cellular processes, suggesting broad roles for GPCR ubiquitination. In this review, we highlight recent studies that illustrate various roles for ubiquitin in regulation of GPCR function. Ubiquitination is known to target many GPCRs for lysosomal degradation, and current studies now indicate that basal ubiquitination, deubiquitination, and transubiquitination of certain GPCRs are important for controlling cell surface expression and cellular responsiveness. In addition, novel functions for ubiquitin in regulation of GPCR dimers and in mediating differential GPCR regulation induced by biased agonists have been reported. We will discuss the implications of these new discoveries for ubiquitin regulation of GPCR function in the context of drug development.

Rab1 interacts directly with the β2-adrenergic receptor to regulate receptor anterograde trafficking

Very little is understood about the trafficking of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to the plasma membrane. Rab guanosine triphosphatases (GTPases) are known to participate in the trafficking of various GPCRs via a direct interaction during the endocytic pathway, but whether this occurs in the anterograde pathway is unknown. We evaluated the potential interaction of Rab1, a GTPase known to regulate β2-adrenergic receptor (β2AR) trafficking, and its effect on export from the ER. Our results show that GTP-bound Rab1 interacts with the F(x)(6)LL motif of β2AR. Receptors lacking the interaction motif fail to traffic properly, suggesting that a direct interaction with Rab1 is required for β2AR anterograde trafficking.

Ubiquitination of CXCR7 Controls Receptor Trafficking

The chemokine receptor CXCR7 binds CXCL11 and CXCL12 with high affinity, chemokines that were previously thought to bind exclusively to CXCR4 and CXCR3, respectively. Expression of CXCR7 has been associated with cardiac development as well as with tumor growth and progression. Despite having all the canonical features of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), the signalling pathways following CXCR7 activation remain controversial, since unlike typical chemokine receptors, CXCR7 fails to activate Gαi-proteins. CXCR7 has recently been shown to interact with β-arrestins and such interaction has been suggested to be responsible for G protein-independent signals through ERK-1/2 phosphorylation. Signal transduction by CXCR7 is controlled at the membrane by the process of GPCR trafficking. In the present study we investigated the regulatory processes triggered by CXCR7 activation as well as the molecular interactions that participate in such processes. We show that, CXCR7 internalizes and recycles back to the cell surface after agonist exposure, and that internalization is not only β-arrestin-mediated but also dependent on the Serine/Threonine residues at the C-terminus of the receptor. Furthermore we describe, for the first time, the constitutive ubiquitination of CXCR7. Such ubiquitination is a key modification responsible for the correct trafficking of CXCR7 from and to the plasma membrane. Moreover, we found that CXCR7 is reversibly de-ubiquitinated upon treatment with CXCL12. Finally, we have also identified the Lysine residues at the C-terminus of CXCR7 to be essential for receptor cell surface delivery. Together these data demonstrate the differential regulation of CXCR7 compared to the related CXCR3 and CXCR4 receptors, and highlight the importance of understanding the molecular determinants responsible for this process.

Endosomal trafficking of the G protein-coupled receptor somatostatin receptor 3

Intracellular trafficking of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) regulates their surface availability and determines cellular response to agonists. Rab GTPases regulate membrane trafficking and identifying Rab networks controlling GPCR trafficking is essential for understanding GPCR signaling. We used real time imaging to show that somatostatin receptor 3 (SSTR3) traffics through Rab4-, Rab21-, and Rab11-containing endosomes, but largely bypasses Rab5 and Rab7 endosomes. We show that SSTR3 rapidly traffics through Rab4 endosomes but moves slower through Rab21 and Rab11 endosomes. SSTR3 passage through each endosomal compartment is regulated by the cognate Rab since expression of the inactive Rab4/S22N, Rab21/T33N, and Rab11/S25N inhibits SSTR3 trafficking. Thus, Rab4, Rab21, and Rab11 may represent therapeutic targets to modulate surface availability of SSTR3 for agonist binding. Our novel finding that Rab21 regulates SSTR3 trafficking suggests that Rab21 may play a role in trafficking of other GPCRs.

Regulation of G Protein-Coupled Receptor Function by Na+/H+ Exchange Regulatory Factors

Many G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) exert patterns of cell-specific signaling and function. Mounting evidence now supports the view that cytoplasmic adapter proteins contribute critically to this behavior. Adapter proteins recognize highly conserved motifs such as those for Src homology 3 (SH3), phosphotyrosine-binding (PTB), and postsynaptic density 95/discs-large/zona occludens (PDZ) docking sequences in candidate GPCRs. Here we review the behavior of the Na+/H+ exchange regulatory factor (NHERF) family of PDZ adapter proteins on GPCR signalling, trafficking, and function. Structural determinants of NHERF proteins that allow them to recognize targeted GPCRs are considered. NHERF1 and NHERF2 are capable also of modifying the assembled complex of accessory proteins such as β-arrestins, which have been implicated in regulating GPCR signaling. In addition, NHERF1 and NHERF2 modulate GPCR signaling by altering the G protein to which the receptor binds or affect other regulatory proteins that affect GTPase activity, protein kinase A, phospholipase C, or modify downstream signaling events. Small molecules targeting the site of NHERF1-GPCR interaction are being developed and may become important and selective drug candidates.

The ocular albinism type 1 (OA1) GPCR is ubiquitinated and its traffic requires endosomal sorting complex responsible for transport (ESCRT) function

The function of signaling receptors is tightly controlled by their intracellular trafficking. One major regulatory mechanism within the endo-lysosomal system required for receptor localization and down-regulation is protein modification by ubiquitination and downstream interactions with the endosomal sorting complex responsible for transport (ESCRT) machinery. Whether and how these mechanisms operate to regulate endosomal sorting of mammalian G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) remains unclear. Here, we explore the involvement of ubiquitin and ESCRTs in the trafficking of OA1, a pigment cell-specific GPCR, target of mutations in Ocular Albinism type 1, which localizes intracellularly to melanosomes to regulate their biogenesis. Using biochemical and morphological methods in combination with overexpression and inactivation approaches we show that OA1 is ubiquitinated and that its intracellular sorting and down-regulation requires functional ESCRT components. Depletion or overexpression of subunits of ESCRT-0, -I, and -III markedly inhibits OA1 degradation with concomitant retention within the modified endosomal system. Our data further show that OA1 ubiquitination is uniquely required for targeting to the intralumenal vesicles of multivesicular endosomes, thereby regulating the balance between down-regulation and delivery to melanosomes. This study highlights the role of ubiquitination and the ESCRT machinery in the intracellular trafficking of mammalian GPCRs and has implications for the physiopathology of ocular albinism type 1.

Role of c-Cbl Carboxyl Terminus in Serotonin 5-HT2A Receptor Recycling and Resensitization

The 5-hydroxytryptamine 2A receptor (5-HT(2A)R) undergoes constitutive and agonist-dependent internalization. Despite many advances in our understanding of G protein-coupled receptor trafficking, the exact mechanism of endocytic sorting of G protein-coupled receptors remains obscure. Recently, we have reported a novel finding documenting a global role for the ubiquitin ligase c-Cbl in regulating vesicular sorting of epidermal growth factor receptor (Baldys, A., Göoz, M., Morinelli, T. A., Lee, M. H., Raymond, J. R., Jr., Luttrell, L. M., and Raymond, J. R., Sr. (2009) Biochemistry 48, 1462-1473). Thus, we tested the hypothesis that c-Cbl might play a role in 5-HT(2A)R recycling. In this study, we demonstrated an association of 5-HT(2A)R with c-Cbl. Furthermore, down-regulation of c-Cbl by RNA interference blocked efficient recycling of 5-HT(2A)R to the plasma membrane. Immunofluorescence microscopy revealed that 5-HT(2A) receptors were trapped in early endosome antigen 1- and Rab11-positive sorting endosomes in cells overexpressing c-Cbl mutants lacking carboxyl termini. This inhibitory effect was associated with a relative decrease in association of c-Cbl truncation proteins with the 5-HT(2A)R, compared with that observed for the full-length c-Cbl fusion protein. Consistent with the delayed recycling, 5-HT(2A)R resensitization was greatly attenuated in the presence of c-Cbl mutants lacking carboxyl termini, as detected by changes in the cytosolic calcium. Taken together, these studies have led to the discovery that the C-terminal region of c-Cbl plays a crucial role in the temporal and spatial control of 5-HT(2A)R recycling.