Background: In acute ischemic stroke (AIS), Computed Tomography Perfusion (CT, CTP) is the most widely used technique for determining extent of tissue likely to die even after successful reperfusion. However, CTP results in higher radiation dose to the patient, is affected by motion, and is not widely available. Multiphase CT Angiography (mCTA), by contrast, is a low radiation extension to the ubiquitous CT Angiography workflow. Here, we evaluate StrokeSENS mCTA Perfusion, a software tool that uses mCTA to estimate brain tissue perfusion, and compare it to CTP in its ability to predict final infarction. Methods: 551 subjects with baseline mCTA, Non-contrast CT (NCCT), and CTP were included. Of these, 480 were part of the development dataset used to derive the mCTA Perfusion algorithm while the remaining 71 were included in the test dataset. T max and CBF perfusion maps were generated on CTP using GE CTP-4D Perfusion, and on mCTA using StrokeSENS mCTA Perfusion. Final infarction was manually segmented on 24-48h MRI/NCCT by 2 experts using ITK-SNAP. Voxel values from CTP and mCTA were assessed in their ability to predict final infarction at an individual patient level (AUC calculated for each patient, then averaged across patients) and for the combined patient data (voxels pooled across patients, then one AUC calculated), then compared (two-sided difference test p-value, p). Results: At patient level, mCTA Perfusion T max AUC was 77.7% (95% c.i.: [74%, 82%]) while CTP T max AUC was 74.6% (95% c.i.: [71%, 79%]), p=0.15. mCTA Perfusion CBF AUC was 68.5% (95% c.i.: [65%, 72%]) while CTP CBF AUC was 69.8% (95% c.i.: [67%, 73%]), p=0.43. In combined patient data analysis, mCTA perfusion T max AUC was 84.13% while CTP T max AUC was 81.36%, p=0. mCTA perfusion CBF AUC was 74.44% while CTP CBF AUC was 72.51%, p=0. Conclusion: StrokeSENS mCTA Perfusion software is similar to traditional CT Perfusion in its ability to predict final infarction in patients with acute ischemic stroke.
Read full abstract