Abstract

Previous studies have shown that spot signs on imaging modalities such as CT perfusion, delayed phase CTA or post contrast CT imaging reportedly have greater ability to predict haematoma expansion (HE) than the traditional CT angiography spot sign. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of the spot sign on delayed imaging modalities in predicting haematoma expansion.Pubmed, Excerpta Medica Database, and the Cochrane library were searched on the 11 November 2019. The search strategy utilised the following terms: CT angiography OR post contrast CT OR CT perfusion OR CT AND intracerebral haemorrhage (or synonyms) AND spot sign OR delayed spot sign OR dynamic spot sign. The area under the summary of receiver operating curves for diagnostic accuracy of delayed spot sign in predicting HE was calculated using bivariate random effects meta-analysis.501 articles were identified, with 10 meeting inclusion criteria. The studies included 711 patients overall, with 272 (38%) demonstrating a spot sign. The presence of a delayed spot sign was associated with HE with a diagnostic odds ratio of 25.4 (12.7-50.9). Pooled sensitivity was 0.81 (0.72-0.88), with a pooled specificity of 0.82 (0.76-0.88). Pooled positive likelihood ratio was 4.30, with a pooled negative likelihood ratio of 0.26. The area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) was 0.88.The delayed spot sign has greater diagnostic accuracy in predicting haematoma expansion than the traditional CT angiography spot sign. Further research could determine the delayed imaging technique that has the greatest diagnostic accuracy.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call