Two 24/7 longtime testing campaigns at the CO2 capture pilot plant at Niederaussem with an accumulated testing time of more than 40,000 h with the CESAR1 solvent, an aqueous solution of 26.7 wt% 2-amino-2-methylpropan-1-ol (AMP) and 12.9 wt% piperazine (PZ), provide a unique data base for the development of solvent management technologies and the evaluation of hypotheses on amine degradation. In the first campaign with a testing time of 34,000 h without replacement of the solvent inventory, three solvent management strategies with different effect mechanisms were investigated: adsorptive removal of trace elements from the solvent by two kinds of active carbon, removal of ionic contaminants by ion exchange using cation and anion exchange resins, and removal of NO2 from the flue gas by treatment with a thiosulfate/sulfite solution. After replacement of the solvent inventory the second campaign was conducted, in which none of the solvent management technologies mentioned have been applied for 10,000 h. The results of the two campaigns allow a direct comparison of the solvent degradation behavior. It is shown that active carbon does not significantly affect the accumulation rate of degradation products in CESAR1, and that an inappropriate kind of active carbon can cause foaming. Anionic degradation products, metal complexes, trace components and cationic contaminants can be effectively removed from the aged solvent by ion exchange. However, after their removal, accelerated formation of oxidative degradation products by a factor of up to 3 higher than before the anion exchange was observed. Removal of NO2 from the flue gas did not affect the NH3 emissions from the CO2 absorber, but it led to the highest observed increase rate of the accumulation of acidic degradation products for aged CESAR1. The results show that exaggerated efforts for solvent management are contra-productive and that a reassessment of the effect mechanisms of solvent management technologies is necessary.