Prostatic artery embolization (PAE) is generally an elective procedure completed for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Technical success has generally been defined by successful bilateral prostatic artery embolization. The largest study to date, performed by Pisco et al of 630 PAE patients, showed a technical success rate of 92.6% with 7.4% of patients receiving unilateral treatment, and 1.9% having bilateral technical failure. However, the specific causes of technical failure have been under-reported in the literature and may help inform clinicians of potential pitfalls. PAE cases from June of 2014 until August of 2020 at two hospitals in a tertiary academic health system were queried (n = 216). Patients were included in this study if they underwent elective PAE as a primary treatment for BPH and were excluded if they received emergent PAE for hematuria or for another indication (e.g., malignancy). For all consecutive patients meeting these inclusion criteria, demographic, baseline, procedural, and follow-up data were collected. Technical failure, defined as failure to achieve bilateral embolization and stasis of the prostatic artery, were noted. The query found 216 consecutive elective PAEs. Of these, 39 cases (18%) demonstrated technical failure. The causes for technical failure were variable. 14 cases (36%) led to technical failure due to anatomical anomalies in the patients, including tortuous arteries (n = 6), diminutive arteries (n = 1), the presence of accessory vessels (n = 4), or small caliber vessels (n = 2), and other anomalies (n = 2). Six cases (15%) were due to failure to visualize vessels. Six cases (15%) were due to spasm or stenosis of vessels. 13 cases (33%) were due to other causes, including difficulty of access, failure to catheterize, fluoroscopic time, or risk of non-target embolization. The specific causes of technical failure in PAE are poorly reported in the literature. In our study, we demonstrate that the most common contributory sources of technical failure in PAE include anatomical variation in patients, failure in visualization, and stenosis or spasm of vessels. Other technical causes accounted for the remaining cases. Our study demonstrates the need for further research to elucidate the more precise causes of technical failure in PAEs.
Read full abstract