You have accessJournal of UrologyProstate Cancer: Detection & Screening V1 Apr 2016MP39-20 ARE THERE ANY APPROPRIATE CRITERIA FOR RECOMMENDING PROSTATE BIOPSY IN PATIENTS OVER 75 YEARS OLD? Yu Teranishi, Takeo Kosaka, Kazuhiro Matsumoto, Shinya Morita, Kazunobu Shinoda, Ryuichi Mizuno, Toshiaki Shinojima, Eiji Kikuchi, Hiroshi Asanuma, Akira Miyajima, and Mototsugu Oya Yu TeranishiYu Teranishi More articles by this author , Takeo KosakaTakeo Kosaka More articles by this author , Kazuhiro MatsumotoKazuhiro Matsumoto More articles by this author , Shinya MoritaShinya Morita More articles by this author , Kazunobu ShinodaKazunobu Shinoda More articles by this author , Ryuichi MizunoRyuichi Mizuno More articles by this author , Toshiaki ShinojimaToshiaki Shinojima More articles by this author , Eiji KikuchiEiji Kikuchi More articles by this author , Hiroshi AsanumaHiroshi Asanuma More articles by this author , Akira MiyajimaAkira Miyajima More articles by this author , and Mototsugu OyaMototsugu Oya More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.02.145AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Appropriate criteria for recommending prostate biopsy are controversial, especially in elderly men. In this study, we investigated the diagnostic value of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and its multiple factors in men over 75 years of age to avoid overdiagnosis and reduce unnecessary biopsy procedures. METHODS A total of 2498 men underwent a transrectal prostate biopsy between 2004 and 2011 at Keio University Hospital in Tokyo. We retrospectively reviewed the records of 458 men who were over 75 years old. Patients with PSA levels between 4.0 and 10.0 ng/ml were divided into two groups: one with a negative biopsy and Gleason score of 6 or less, the other with a Gleason score of 7 or more. The clinical values of age, prostate volume (P vol), prostate transition zone volume (Tz vol), prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD), and prostate-specific antigen density of the transition zone (PSATzD) for the detection of prostate cancer were compared using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and by calculating the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. The same was conducted for PSA levels between 10.0 and 20.0 ng/ml and over 20.0 ng/ml. RESULTS Among the patients with PSA levels between 4.0 and 10.0 ng/ml, the mean (± SD) age, PSA, P vol, Tz vol, PSAD, and PSATzD were 77.7 ± 2.5 years, 6.7 ± 1.6 ng/ml, 38.2 ± 21.5 cm3,19.0 ± 14.9 cm3, 0.22 ± 0.12, and 0.54 ± 0.39, respectively, in men with positive biopsy. There were significant differences in PSA (P=0.001), P vol (P<0.001), Tz vol (P<0.001), PSAD (P<0.001), and PSATzD (P<0.001). A total of 153 men had a negative biopsy and Gleason score 6 or less, and 92 a Gleason score 7 or more. Statistical analysis to compare these 153 men and 92 men revealed a significant difference in PSAD only (P<0.001). The area under the curve of ROC of PSAD was 0.711. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 76.1%, 52.69%, 49.3%, and 78.6%, respectively, by setting the cut-off value to PSAD 0.15. Among the patients with PSA levels between 10.0 and 20.0 ng/ml and with PSA levels over 20.0 ng/ml, there was no difference in PSAD. CONCLUSIONS Patients 75 or older with a PSA level between 4.0 and 10.0 ng/ml and PSAD less than 0.15 are unlikely to have prostate cancer and therefore it may be possible to avoid overdiagnosis, thereby reducing unnecessary biopsies. © 2016FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 195Issue 4SApril 2016Page: e549 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2016MetricsAuthor Information Yu Teranishi More articles by this author Takeo Kosaka More articles by this author Kazuhiro Matsumoto More articles by this author Shinya Morita More articles by this author Kazunobu Shinoda More articles by this author Ryuichi Mizuno More articles by this author Toshiaki Shinojima More articles by this author Eiji Kikuchi More articles by this author Hiroshi Asanuma More articles by this author Akira Miyajima More articles by this author Mototsugu Oya More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...