ethical principles do not change. They are the same East and West, past and present. The morality, however, is an ethos peculiar to a specific nationality. It aims at actualizing the abstract generalities of ethics. This presupposes particular situations and relationships, that is, a life. Environment, the disposition of the race, and the effects of history all contribute to the shaping of each specific Thus it was largely due to a remote geographical location that Japan developed her unique ethos. A morality is not the work of individuals. It is an unconscious, instinctual, spiritual creation seething and bubbling up within a race. Ethics, on the other hand, being more advanced, develops consciously. It is inferential, universalistic, non-instinctual, unemotional, and intellectual. While the morality is determined by history (and is therefore conservative), ethics is 18 Japanese Journal of Religious Studies 3/1 March 1976 This content downloaded from 157.55.39.45 on Thu, 01 Sep 2016 04:31:43 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms The Civil Theology of Inoue Tetsujir6 open to the future. Historical investigation of the morality must be supplemented by a critical investigation of the morality that will bring forth a plan for the people's future moral development. In other words, the study of the morality must rely on ethics per se since it is ethics that is oriented toward the future. Thus critical research in the history of morality must throw light on today's principles through weighing those of the past. It must be critical as well as historical, practical as well as normative. At this point Inoue introduces his notion of selectivity. Certain elements are incompatible with the morality and must be carefully screened out. He cites as an example the Chinese theory of the change of the Mandate (ekisei kakumei) and various Western political theories that condone regicide. These are not compatible with Japan's A healthy ethics will assist in the selection of appropriate elements and in this way guide the morality toward the future. This he thought could already be seen in Japanese history in the role played by Neo-Confucianism as it shaped the morality of his own generation. Inoue made a fundamental distinction between national and national morality. National character points to the de facto characteristics of a people, morality to the way citizens should behave. The character of the Japanese isjissaiteki, which is to say that they are concerned with empirical reality and not with abstract reasoning. They are optimistic, unostentatious, and feel at one with nature. Among their other natural virtues are their mental acumen, simplicity, and purity. The Japanese, who take frequent hot baths and wash before entering shrine precincts, are extremely pure in their bodily habits, especially, he thought, when compared with other Asians. In contrast to the Chinese, who are dull and slow, the Japanese are emotionally susceptible and respond quickly to stimuli. This means, however, that they are easily taken in Japanese Journal of Religious Studies 3/1 March 1976 19 This content downloaded from 157.55.39.45 on Thu, 01 Sep 2016 04:31:43 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Read full abstract