Most rainfall and almost all runoff from Southwestern rangelands are the result of intense summer thunderstorm rainfall. Gully growth and headcutting are evident throughout the region. A large, active headcut on a Walnut Gulch subwatershed has been surveyed at irregular intervals from 1966 to present. Runoff at the headcut was estimated using a kinematic cascade rainfall-runoff model (KINEROS). The headcut sediment contribution was about 25% of the total sediment load measured downstream from the headcut; and the sediment contribution from the swale drainage above the headcut, as estimated from a depth-integrated pumping sampler, was about the same. Although more data are needed to quantify sediment contributions from other tributary watersheds, the total contribution from gully banks and headcuts on Walnut Gulch must be an important portion of the total sediment load. The 150-km2 Walnut Gulch Experimental Watershed, near Tombstone, Arizona, is typical of much of the semiarid rangeland in the southwestern United States. Walnut Gulch is a tributary of the San Pedro River. Most rainfall and almost all runoff from these rangelands are the result of intense summer thunderstorm rains of short duration and limited areal extent. Gully growth and headcutting have been evident throughout the region, including Walnut Gulch. In 1975, a project was initiated to determine the gullyand headcut contribution to sediment loads at several runoff-measuring stations on Walnut Gulch. One of the principal objectives of the program was to determine the rate of headcut development and the proportional headcut contribution to the total watershed sediment yield. The object of this study was to determine movement and sediment contribution of a major headcut on watershed 63.011, a subdrainage of Walnut Gulch. Historical Background The most intensive study of gully erosion in the United States was carried out by H.A. Ireland, C.F.S. Sharpe, and D.H. Eargle, and published in USDA Technical Bulletin 633 (1939). Although the study area was on the Piedmont of South Carolina, the report serves as a landmark effort in understanding gully erosion and headcut migration elsewhere. In their report, they stated: Almost all gullies result from the acceleration of runoff, or from an unnatural concentration of flowing water. Acceleration and concentration of water have been brought about in various ways, and gullies may be classified into several groups on the basis of their origin. Increased amounts of runoff result from overgrazing, burning, deforestation, or denuding of the land by cultivation. Concentration of the runoff is caused by construction of roads and railroads, with their accompanying ditches, by construction of terraces and terrace outlets, by contour plowing followed by breaking-over of furrows during heavy rains, and by stock paths which, in many cases, become rills and gullies. Acceleration of the movement of water in stream channels is sometimes brought about by clearing of brush from the banks, a practice which often results in accelerated bank erosion. The theory of erosional processes has been covered by many, including Beasley (1972) and Thormes (1980). The mechanisms of erosion and sediment movement from gullies have been reported by others, including Piest, Bradford, and Spomer (1975) and Piest, Bradford, and Wyatt (1975). However, most of the available data Authors are research hydraulic engineer and hydrologist, USDA-ARS, Southwest Rangeland Watershed Research Center, 2000 East Allen Road, Tucson, Ariz. 85719. Manuscript accepted 27 January 1986. on gully erosion is from farmlands, rather than rangelands. The southeastern Arizona geologic record indicates gullying has occurred in the past, but the most recent intense episode of accelerated gullying appears to have begun in the 1880's (Hastings and Turner 1965). Gullies in the 2 major stream channels of southeastern Arizona, the San Pedro and Santa Cruz Rivers, began because of man's activities in the flood plains and were accelerated by increased runoff from overgrazed tributary watersheds. From m andering perennial streams, both the San Pedro and Santa Cruz became incised ephemeral channels. The gullies proceeded to develop from the major channels upward into the tributary watersheds. Gullies migrated well into Walnut Gulch from the San Pedro. The advance of gullies has slowed as the amount of contributing runoff area to each decreased, but a few gullies are still very active. The most active gullies are those with large contributing areas remaining, a result of restricted headcutting at one or more times during the upward migration. Watershed Description Watershed 63.011 (824 hectares) is located in the upper part of Walnut Gulch Experimental Watershed. There are 10 weighingtype recording raingages located on, or immediately adjacent to, the watershed (Fig. 1). Runoff stage is measured with an A-35