Abstract
Abstract An investigation is made of the extent to which variations in Z–R (reflectivity factor–rainfall rate) relations can explain the systematically large offsets of radar-measured rainfall from rain gauge measurements as observed with some National Weather Service (NWS) WSR-88D radars. It is shown that theory predicts that the use by the NWS of the current default Z–R relation (Z = 300R1.4) should underestimate rainfall by about 25% in stratiform rain and overestimate it by about 33% in thunderstorm rain. Yet it is commonly observed that some WSR-88D radars systematically underestimate rainfall by a factor of 2 or more in stratiform rain and produce estimates of rainfall with acceptable accuracy for isolated thunderstorms. It is shown that variations in Z–R law parameters alone cannot explain these discrepancies, and it is proposed that their origin lies in a radar calibration offset. A comparison is made of reflectivity factors measured by the KGSP WSR-88D at Greer, South Carolina, with those determi...
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
