The miniaturization of portable electronic devices and urgent demand for long-range electric vehicles (EVs) drive researchers to seek for advanced lithium ion batteries (LIBs) as power sources with high energy densities. Traditional cathode materials (LiCoO2, LiMn2O4, LiFePO4 and their derivatives) with specific capacities less than 200 mA h g-1 are not able to fulfil the challenge. As one of the most promising alternatives, lithium-rich layered oxides (LRLOs) with exceptionally high capacities exceeding 250 mA h g-1 have been attracting extensive research interests for high energy density LIBs during the last decade.1-3 However, intrinsic disadvantages of voltage decay and capacity fade resulting from structural instability hinder practical use of LRLOs. Strategies such as ionic doping and surface engineering have been developed to improve electrochemical performance of LRLOs, but with limited understanding of the origins of their high capacity, voltage decay and capacity fade. Ru-based LRLOs stand out their counterparts for the good rate performance benefiting from low resistivity of Ru-based compounds. As the major component of Ru-based LRLOs, although Li2RuO3 exhibits large specific capacity and good rate capability, it suffers severely from capacity fade and voltage decay upon prolonged cycling. Herein in this work, for the first time, Cr has been employed as a dopant in Li2RuO3 compound and the correlation between Cr doping and electrochemical performance of Li2RuO3 is investigated. Elemental Cr is selected as dopant for plenty of reasons. Firstly, LiCrO2 possesses a layered structure with R-3m symmetry, which has similar oxygen stacking framework with Li2RuO3 layered structure. Besides, the ionic radius of Cr3+ (0.615 Å) is close to that of Ru4+ (0.62 Å). The similarity in crystal structure and ionic radius guarantees that the structure of Li2RuO3 is not destroyed by Cr doping. Secondly, Cr3+/Cr6+ three-electron redox reaction is electrochemically active which is expected to favor the capacity improvement of Li2RuO3 compound, as lots of literatures reported that Cr-doped Mn-based LRLOs showed enhanced reversible capacity because of the introduction of three-electron redox reaction of Cr3+/Cr6+. Thirdly, Singh and colleagues reported that Cr in the Cr-doped composite Li2MnO3-LiMn0.5Ni0.5O2 acts as a catalyst for the activation of Li2MnO3 component in the electrochemical reaction,4 which makes it reasonable to deduce that Cr activates anionic electrochemistry and thus contributes to capacity improvement. Based on the above considerations, we synthesized Cr-doped Li2RuO3 with different doping degrees (Li2RuO3, Li2Ru0.98Cr0.02O3, Li2Ru0.95Cr0.05O3 and Li2Ru0.9Cr0.1O3, denoted as LRO, LRO-Cr0.02, LRO-Cr0.05 and LRO-Cr0.1, respectively) by high-temperature sintering method. It is shown that with appropriate amount of Cr doping, the capacity, rate performance and cycling stability can be significantly improved for Li2RuO3 compound. Figure 1
Read full abstract