The lives of others won most of top European and international film prizes between 2006 and 2007, including seven Lolas and an Oscar, but it has also been heavily attacked by some critics both for its sympathetic portrait of a Stasi officer and for its misogynistic portrait of a faithless, drug-addicted actress (e.g., Porton; Foundas). The monstrous Gerd Wiesler, critics have argued, is magically transformed into the Good of Georg Dreyman's novel after his sudden exposure to theater, poetry, and music, and vulnerable Christa-Maria Sieland (Mar- tina Gedeck) must be sacrificed to film's central love story, that between Wiesler (Ulrich Muhe) and Dreyman (Sebastian Koch). In my view, much of this negative criticism implicitly acknowledges that Lives is tremendously suc- cessful at authentically recreating East Ber- lin of 1980s. The film captures bleak- ness of architecture, cuisine, and fashion in such unnerving detail that reviews insistently demand that film deliver docu- mentary accuracy. too responded to film's authenticity and found its recreation of East Berlin had visited in 1983 uncanny and unset- tling. Florian Henckel von Donnersmarck took pains to film on location in rare streets that had not been transformed after fall of Berlin Wall. He refined palette of film to capture sense of color in German Demo- cratic Republic (GDR), so that greens stand in for blues and orange-browns replace reds (von Donnersmarck, Interview on DVD). Visually, film strives for quality of documentary.But The Lives of Others is not a documentary. Although he researched his subject thoroughly for four years, von Donnersmarck's understand- ing of character, his interest in relationships, and his belief in transformative power of art do not come from history, but from an educa- tion in classic Western cinema. We do not fault Casablanca (1942) or Rome, Open City (1945) for being sentimental. We do not blame The Red Shoes (1948) or The Third Man (1949) for being overblown. Instead, we celebrate these films for courage of their sentimentality and hyperbole. And von Donnersmarck's first film is an homage to his cinematic heritage. The per- formance of Martina Gedeck cannot be divorced from iconic performances of Ingrid Berg- man, Alida Valli, Anna Magnani, Moira Shearer, and Julie Christie on which hers is based. And an awareness of Wiesler's cinematic anteced- ents complicates any simple reading of him as a good man.These antecedents have been largely over- shadowed by ideological critiques of Lives. Anna Funder, author of Stasiland, an ex- traordinary book about life in GDR, fears that Lives is fostering a new form of Ostalgie.Groups of ex-Stasi are becoming increasingly belligerent. They write articles and books, and conduct lawsuits against people who speak out against them, including against German publisher of Stasiland. . . . The system demanded such loyalty . . . that most ex-Stasi are still true believers. A story such as Wiesler's plays into their hands as they fight for their reputation. (Funder, Tyranny of Terror)Funder admires Lives: I think film deserves its public and critical acclaim. It is a superb film, a thing of beauty. But it could not have taken place (and never did) under GDR dic- tatorship. . . . No Stasi man ever tried to save his victims, because it was impossible. We'd know if one had, because files are so com- prehensive (Tyranny).Whereas Funder argues that von Donners- marck is taking brutal fact and turning it into narrative, argue exactly oppo- site. Von Donnersmarck's particular achieve- ment is using his cinematic influences-almost all of which are fantasy narratives-and trans- forming these into a film that many critics have misread as an attempt at documentary real- ity. Yet an intertextual reading that accounts for these fantasy narratives can do much to shatter this misperception. …
Read full abstract