Objectives The purpose of this paper is to examine how the categories of engagement are selected and used in each text type, focusing on news articles and editorials, and how they differ. Through this, we want to see how the realization of these engagements reveals the discursive purpose of each text type.
 Methods To achieve this purpose, the text of news articles and editorials was divided into sentence units, and the categories of engagement and linguistic elements (mood, modality, negation, quotation, etc.) that realize engagement within these sentences were examined.
 Results As a result of analyzing news articles and editorials as engagement, there is a clear difference in terms of the use of engagement between news articles and editorials, as the former is a text that aims to convey objective information, while the latter is a subjective text that expresses the writer's own opinion. News articles use monogloss to present a proposition (information) as incontrovertible and taken for granted, and uses other engagements to give objectivity to the proposition. Editorials, on the other hand, present the writer's argument through pronounce and use other engagements to give validity to the argument.
 Conclusions Through the above analysis results, it was possible to confirm what categories of engagement are frequently selected and realized from the text types of news articles and editorials, and what kind of differences in use they have. It was also possible to see how this aspect of realization achieves the purpose of the discourse of the two text types. The results of this analysis will be significant in that it will help you understand the grammatical characteristics of the texts of news articles and editorials. In addition, I think it is significant in that it shows the categories of engagement used to achieve the purpose of the discourse, such as the delivery of information and the expression of position, and its meaning and function.