Testicular Sperm Extraction In Men Research Articles

Outcome Of In Vitro Fertilization And Intracytoplasmic Injection Of Epididymal And Testicular Sperm Obtained From Patients With Obstructive And Nonobstructive Azoospermia

We assessed fertilization, pregnancy and miscarriage rates in patients with obstructive and nonobstructive azoospermia who underwent intracytoplasmic sperm injection. From June 1996 to March 2000, 166 consecutive patients (198 intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles) with azoospermia were studied. Of these 198 cycles 68 were performed due to nonobstructive azoospermia using testicular spermatozoa and 130 were performed due to obstructive azoospermia using epididymal spermatozoa. The normal (2 pronuclei) and abnormal (1 plus 3 pronuclei) fertilization rates for obstructive and nonobstructive azoospermia were 60.5% and 16.6%, and 54% and 16.4%, respectively (p >0.05). The pregnancy rate per cycle, pregnancy rate per patient and abortion rate were 30%, 39.8% and 28% for obstructive azoospermia, and 22%, 28.3% and 40% for nonobstructive azoospermia (p <0.05). The normal and abnormal fertilization rates were 58.7% and 21.4% for percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration (PESA), 62.3% and 10.4% for PESA plus testicular sperm aspiration (TESA), and 57.3% and 14.5% for TESA, respectively (p >0.05). The pregnancy rate per cycle, pregnancy rate per patient and abortion rate were 34.6%, 54.5% and 11.1% for PESA, 37.5%, 37.5% and 33.3% for PESA plus TESA, and 26.1%, 31% and 41% for TESA, respectively (PESA versus PESA plus TESA p >0.05, and PESA and PESA plus TESA versus TESA p <0.05). Epididymal or testicular motile sperm resulted in a lower abortion rate than epididymal or testicular immotile sperm (p = 0.03). No differences were noted in the fertilization and embryo transfer rates irrespective of etiology (obstructive versus nonobstructive) and type of spermatozoa (epididymal versus testicular). Testicular sperm retrieval results in lower fertilization and pregnancy rates as well as higher abortion rates than epididymal sperm retrieval.

Serum inhibin B determination is predictive of successful testicular sperm extraction in men with non-obstructive azoospermia.

Recent work indicates that serum inhibin B is a useful marker of spermatogenesis and inhibin B production sufficient to maintain detectable serum concentrations in adults depends on spermatogenic activity. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the usefulness of serum inhibin B measurement to predict the success of testicular sperm extraction (TESE) in 17 men with nonobstructive azoospermia to be treated by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) (group 1). Two additional groups were used as positive controls; group 2 comprised 22 infertile men having obstructive azoospermia, and group 3, which included 29 semen donors having normal seminal parameters. Follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) was significantly higher (P < 0.01) and inhibin B significantly lower (P < 0.001), in group 1 as compared with groups 2 and 3. Serum inhibin B concentrations were significantly higher (P < 0.001) among successful TESE men as compared with those having failed TESE. In contrast, no differences were detected between these two groups with respect to serum FSH or testicular size. In addition, serum inhibin B but not FSH discriminated between successful and failed TESE in group 1 subjects as compared with control groups. According to the receiver operating characteristics curve analysis, the best inhibin B value for discriminating between successful and failed TESE was >40 pg/ml (sensitivity 90%, specificity 100%). It is concluded that inhibin B measurement is a useful non-invasive predictor of spermatogenesis and thus, all azoospermic males should have serum inhibin B concentrations determined in addition to FSH measurement and karyotyping prior to undergoing TESE.

A prospective study comparing testicular and ejaculated spermatids for predicting the probability of testicular sperm extraction in men with non-obstructive azoospermia

International Journal of Gynecology & ObstetricsVolume 70, Issue S4 p. D51-D51 Assisted reproduction medecine: Basic A prospective study comparing testicular and ejaculated spermatids for predicting the probability of testicular sperm extraction in men with non-obstructive azoospermia U.I.O. Ezeh, U.I.O. EzehSearch for more papers by this authorH.D.M. Moore, H.D.M. MooreSearch for more papers by this authorI.D. Cooke, I.D. CookeSearch for more papers by this author U.I.O. Ezeh, U.I.O. EzehSearch for more papers by this authorH.D.M. Moore, H.D.M. MooreSearch for more papers by this authorI.D. Cooke, I.D. CookeSearch for more papers by this author First published: 11 December 2003 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7292(00)81827-5AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditWechat No abstract is available for this article. Volume70, IssueS42000Pages D51-D51 RelatedInformation

A Prospective Study of Multiple Needle Biopsies Versus a Single Open Biopsy for Testicular Sperm Extraction in Men With Non-Obstructive Azoospermia

Little is known about the efficacy and the factors affecting the outcome of fine needle aspiration biopsy of the testis for sperm retrieval in azoospermic men with defective spermatogenesis. A prospective study was designed to compare the efficacy of needle and open (window) testicular biopsies for testicular epididymal sperm extraction (TESE) in 35 consecutive men with azoospermia due to defective spermatogenesis undergoing testicular biopsy for intracytoplasmic injection of oocytes. Each of the consecutive 35 patients underwent TESE using a 19 gauge butterfly needle followed by a window (1-1.5 cm-sized incision) testicular biopsy in the same procedure. The extraction of spermatozoa into culture medium was compared with the assessment of testicular biopsies by histology, the mode of biopsy (needle or open biopsy) and the amount of tissue retrieved by either method. Testicular spermatozoa were retrieved in 22 (63%) who had an open testicular biopsy compared with five (14%) patients who had multiple needle biopsies, respectively; the difference was statistically significant. Open testicular biopsy retrieves more testicular tissue than needle biopsy. Needle testicular biopsy retrieved testicular spermatozoa in 50% of those with hypospermatogenesis, 10% with focal spermatogenesis and in no patients with maturation arrest or Sertoli cell-only pattern. In contrast, sperm retrieval was successful in 100%, 90% and 66% of those with respective histologies using open testicular biopsy. Other than bruising, for which they required no analgesia, none of the patients suffered any obvious complications associated with traditional testicular biopsy. We conclude that open testicular biopsy is more effective than needle biopsy for the retrieval of testicular spermatozoa in azoospermic men with defective spermatogenesis. The difference observed may be related to the amount of testicular tissue retrieved and to the influence of testicular histology.

A Prospective Study of Multiple Needle Biopsies Versus a Single Open Biopsy for Testicular Sperm Extraction in Men With Non-Obstructive Azoospermia

Little is known about the efficacy and the factors affecting the outcome of fine needle aspiration biopsy of the testis for sperm retrieval in azoospermic men with defective spermatogenesis. A prospective study was designed to compare the efficacy of needle and open (window) testicular biopsies for testicular epididymal sperm extraction (TESE) in 35 consecutive men with azoospermia due to defective spermatogenesis undergoing testicular biopsy for intracytoplasmic injection of oocytes. Each of the consecutive 35 patients underwent TESE using a 19 gauge butterfly needle followed by a window (1-1.5 cm-sized incision) testicular biopsy in the same procedure. The extraction of spermatozoa into culture medium was compared with the assessment of testicular biopsies by histology, the mode of biopsy (needle or open biopsy) and the amount of tissue retrieved by either method. Testicular spermatozoa were retrieved in 22 (63%) who had an open testicular biopsy compared with five (14%) patients who had multiple needle biopsies, respectively; the difference was statistically significant. Open testicular biopsy retrieves more testicular tissue than needle biopsy. Needle testicular biopsy retrieved testicular spermatozoa in 50% of those with hypospermatogenesis, 10% with focal spermatogenesis and in no patients with maturation arrest or Sertoli cell-only pattern. In contrast, sperm retrieval was successful in 100%, 90% and 66% of those with respective histologies using open testicular biopsy. Other than bruising, for which they required no analgesia, none of the patients suffered any obvious complications associated with traditional testicular biopsy. We conclude that open testicular biopsy is more effective than needle biopsy for the retrieval of testicular spermatozoa in azoospermic men with defective spermatogenesis. The difference observed may be related to the amount of testicular tissue retrieved and to the influence of testicular histology.