1. Introduction Under current conditions of Russian economy modernization, executive authorities of the Russian Federation faced the need to revise traditional models of public governance that proved to be inadequate to new requirements of regional governance. Population demand for various types of public services is a key factor in creating the system of territorial governance. Participation of population in all stages of the process will specifically allow to take into account the needs and, depending on them, to adjust the funding of various spheres of public life [7]. In recent years the regions have implemented some measures aimed at improvement of tasks performance of government executive authorities and the quality of services provided to the population. Standards of social services for senior citizens and people with disabilities, Nomenclature and Provisions on the work of public institutions of social services, Lists of guaranteed social services and additional services with tariffs approved by resolutions of Regional Tariff Service were developed and endorsed by the Heads of local governments of various constituent entities of the Russian Federation. In addition, a variety of software systems to form a database of social services consumers were developed and implemented. However, the above-listed measures are not sufficient for a systematic approach to formation of regional governance mechanisms and provision of high-quality public services [6]. Moreover, experience of territorial governance in the last decades shows a clear trend of strengthening regional differences within national federal system. All this imposes requirements for the development of theses of modern theory of regional efficiency and coordination of obtained evaluations with the level of socio-economic territory development. Modern theory and practice of regional governance offers various perspectives on problems of efficiency and development dynamics of meso-level economic systems. Thus, the method developed by the Government of the Russian Federation [15] defines a unified procedure for evaluating the performance of executive authorities of constituent entities of the Russian Federation in the accounting period in order to prepare an annual report to the President of the Russian Federation. It is worth mentioning that within the framework of the aforesaid methodology there were developed some algorithms allowing calculating the proportion of inefficient expenditure in total budget expenditures in various spheres of life of constituent entities of the Russian Federation. In this case quantitative evaluations are formed. The disadvantage of these algorithms, and, therefore, evaluations obtained on their basis, is the fact that the data from different constituent entities are used in the calculations, and, thus, the evaluation of inefficient spending of one constituent entity is put in dependence on the indicators of the other constituent entities. The Federal State Statistics Service (Rosstat) in the last statistics digests Regions of Russia. Socio-economic indicators [16, 32-35] indicates the rank of the region along with the evaluation. The main indicators most commonly used for evaluation of regional development are unemployment rate and GDP per capita [9, 190]. Another method of analyzing the development of regions is an adaptive method of regional indicators space structuring. The centerpiece of proposed approach is a concept of a zone of acceptable (average) states which is defined as a certain neighborhood of average indicator values for the group of regions under consideration. Thus, the resulting structure of the space of indicators is determined not only by the size of the zone, but position in this space of the center of mass the point defined by the average values of the indicators for the given set of regions [19, 172-181]. Questions of territorial administration performance evaluation are widely discussed in both foreign and Russian studies. …
Read full abstract