Branch architecture plays an important role in forest physical and ecological processes, greatly affecting forest spatial structure and the accumulation, production and distribution of organic carbon. Very few studies have quantified the branch architecture of large-scale forest plots, due to the lack of high-resolution large-scale three-dimensional data. The emergence of unmanned aerial vehicle-light detecting and ranging (UAV-LiDAR) provides great potential to overcome this limitation. However, due to insufficient quality of UAV-LiDAR data for branch reconstruction, existing algorithms remain tremendously challenging. We propose an effective branch reconstruction algorithm for UAV-LiDAR data to quantify branch architecture. First, individual branches are extracted using a region growth method that is guided by the branch growth direction and local smoothness constraint. Second, incorrect branches are eliminated based on three pieces of branch features, i.e., specific angles between branches at the same whorl, specific height differences between branches at different whorls, and the growth pattern of branches from the stem outward, reaching maximum distances at tips. Finally, branches are reconstructed using polynomial fitting, and branch architecture parameters are extracted based on branch models. The proposed algorithm simplifies branch reconstruction by skipping the separation of photosynthetic and non-photosynthetic components. It also adapts well to UAV-LiDAR point clouds, generating more realistic reconstructions. The algorithm successfully identified non-photosynthetic components in experiments involving 240 trees, including Scots pine, Norway spruce, and Radiata pine. The average overall accuracy for these three species was 0.88, 0.76, and 0.74, respectively. The proposed algorithm was tested for branch reconstruction using UAV-LiDAR data from a two-hectare Larix principis-rupprechtii plot. The accuracy of branch identification and parameter extraction accuracy were evaluated branch by branch based on the individual branches manually identified in terrestrial laser scanning data. Results showed the F-score of branch and stem identification was 0.58 and 1. The relative RMSE of branch length and angle was 36.87% and 18.3%, and ones of stem length and diameter were 1.46% and 6.16%. The proposed algorithm outperformed the well-known reconstruction algorithms, including TreeQSM, AdTree and Laplacian-based algorithms.
Read full abstract