The intensity duration frequency (IDF) curves that inform engineering design must reflect the effects of changing climate on extreme precipitation events. These changes can be addressed, in part, by statistically assessing synthetic data/outputs from high-resolution climate model projections to develop IDF curves. The estimation of IDF curves is associated with multiple sources of uncertainty. Most studies that characterize uncertainty in IDF curves under climate change only address the uncertainty due to the choice and processing of climate model outputs, but neglect uncertainty from statistical modeling choices. This study assesses the uncertainty introduced by developing IDF curves for Maryland, USA from model simulations of current and future climate, using statistical methods that are used in U.S. practice. The study analyzes output time series from the North American Regional Climate Change Assessment Program (NARCCAP) suite, which consists of 6 Atmosphere-Ocean General Circulation Models, each spatially downscaled with two different Regional Climate Models. In a separate study, the 3-hour NARCCAP model output was temporally downscaled to 15 min using two different machine learning models. Uncertainty is assessed both across and within models. Across-model uncertainty arises from the differences among synthetic time-series for precipitation and other meteorological variables produced by the 12 NARCCAP climate model projections. Within-model uncertainty arises from the modeling choices used to develop statistical IDF curves from a single climate model time series. These choices include: temporal downscaling method, time-series type, distribution, and parameter estimation method. The choice of climate model (across-model uncertainty) is the dominant contributor under both current and future climate conditions. On the within-model level, the other sources of uncertainty contribute differently for different climate models. The development and application of future-climate IDF curves should acknowledge the uncertainty introduced by statistical modeling choices, as well as by variation among climate model projections.