Telemedicine Screening Program Research Articles

Telemedicine screening program for diabetic retinopathy in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus

PurposeTo analyze the results of the telemedicine screening program for diabetic retinopathy (DR) in patients with type 1 diabetes conducted by the Endocrinology and Nutrition Management Unit of Virgen del Rocío University Hospital. MethodsThis cross-sectional study comprised patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM) in our DR screening program from January 2018 to November 2020. Fundus photographs are performed by trained nurses and reviewed by a trained endocrinologist. Those suggestive of pathology are sent to ophthalmology through a telematic program for review. ResultsOf the 995 fundus photographs evaluated, 646 (65.3%) showed no evidence of DR, 327 (33.1%) presented possible DR, and 16 (1.6%) were not gradable. The diagnosis was confirmed in 254 patients after reviewing by ophthalmology, and the screening program achieved a positive predictive value for DR of 77.7%. Seventy-three were excluded by ophthalmology due to the absence of DR (false positive rate – 22.3%). In 92.5% of the cases classified by the ophthalmologist, the degree of DR was mild or very mild. ConclusionOur telemedicine screening program for DR in patients with type 1 DM is consistent with the literature. Effective screening for DR is performed, with patients diagnosed in the early stages. Telemedicine programs facilitate efficient communication among healthcare personnel.

Convolutional Neural Networks Accurately Identify Ungradable Images in a Diabetic Retinopathy Telemedicine Screening Program.

Purpose: Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a microvascular complication of diabetes mellitus (DM). Standard of care for patients with DM is an annual eye examination or retinal imaging to assess for DR, the latter of which may be completed through telemedicine approaches. One significant issue is poor-quality images that prevent adequate screening and are thus ungradable. We used artificial intelligence to enable point-of-care (at time of imaging) identification of ungradable images in a DR screening program. Methods: Nonmydriatic retinal images were gathered from patients with DM imaged during a primary care or endocrinology visit from September 1, 2017, to June 1, 2021. The Topcon TRC-NW400 retinal camera (Topcon Corp., Tokyo, Japan) was used. Images were interpreted by 5 ophthalmologists for gradeability, presence and stage of DR, and presence of non-DR pathologies. A convolutional neural network with Inception V3 network architecture was trained to assess image gradeability. Images were divided into training and test sets, and 10-fold cross-validation was performed. Results: A total of 1,377 images from 537 patients (56.1% female, median age 58) were analyzed. Ophthalmologists classified 25.9% of images as ungradable. Of gradable images, 18.6% had DR of varying degrees and 26.5% had non-DR pathology. 10 fold cross-validation produced an average area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.922 (standard deviation: 0.027, range: 0.882 to 0.961). The final model exhibited similar test set performance with an AUC of 0.924. Conclusions: This model accurately assesses gradeability of nonmydriatic retinal images. It could be used for increasing the efficiency of DR screening programs by enabling point-of-care identification of poor-quality images.

Telemedicine screening program for diabetic retinopathy in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus

PurposeTo analyze the results of the telemedicine screening program for diabetic retinopathy (DR) in patients with type 1 diabetes conducted by the Endocrinology and Nutrition Management Unit of Virgen del Rocío University Hospital. MethodsThis cross-sectional study comprised patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM) in our DR screening program from January 2018 to November 2020. Fundus photographs are performed by trained nurses and reviewed by a trained endocrinologist. Those suggestive of pathology are sent to ophthalmology through a telematic program for review. ResultsOf the 995 fundus photographs evaluated, 646 (65.3%) showed no evidence of DR, 327 (33.1%) presented possible DR, and 16 (1.6%) were not gradable. The diagnosis was confirmed in 254 patients after reviewing by ophthalmology, and the screening program achieved a positive predictive value for DR of 77.7%. Seventy-three were excluded by ophthalmology due to the absence of DR (false positive rate – 22.3%). In 92.5% of the cases classified by the ophthalmologist, the degree of DR was mild or very mild. ConclusionOur telemedicine screening program for DR in patients with type 1 DM is consistent with the literature. Effective screening for DR is performed, with patients diagnosed in the early stages. Telemedicine programs facilitate efficient communication among healthcare personnel.

External Validation of a Retinopathy of Prematurity Screening Model Using Artificial Intelligence in 3 Low- and Middle-Income Populations

Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a leading cause of preventable blindness that disproportionately affects children born in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). In-person and telemedical screening examinations can reduce this risk but are challenging to implement in LMICs owing to the multitude of at-risk infants and lack of trained ophthalmologists. To implement an ROP risk model using retinal images from a single baseline examination to identify infants who will develop treatment-requiring (TR)-ROP in LMIC telemedicine programs. In this diagnostic study conducted from February 1, 2019, to June 30, 2021, retinal fundus images were collected from infants as part of an Indian ROP telemedicine screening program. An artificial intelligence (AI)-derived vascular severity score (VSS) was obtained from images from the first examination after 30 weeks' postmenstrual age. Using 5-fold cross-validation, logistic regression models were trained on 2 variables (gestational age and VSS) for prediction of TR-ROP. The model was externally validated on test data sets from India, Nepal, and Mongolia. Data were analyzed from October 20, 2021, to April 20, 2022. Primary outcome measures included sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for predictions of future occurrences of TR-ROP; the number of weeks before clinical diagnosis when a prediction was made; and the potential reduction in number of examinations required. A total of 3760 infants (median [IQR] postmenstrual age, 37 [5] weeks; 1950 male infants [51.9%]) were included in the study. The diagnostic model had a sensitivity and specificity, respectively, for each of the data sets as follows: India, 100.0% (95% CI, 87.2%-100.0%) and 63.3% (95% CI, 59.7%-66.8%); Nepal, 100.0% (95% CI, 54.1%-100.0%) and 77.8% (95% CI, 72.9%-82.2%); and Mongolia, 100.0% (95% CI, 93.3%-100.0%) and 45.8% (95% CI, 39.7%-52.1%). With the AI model, infants with TR-ROP were identified a median (IQR) of 2.0 (0-11) weeks before TR-ROP diagnosis in India, 0.5 (0-2.0) weeks before TR-ROP diagnosis in Nepal, and 0 (0-5.0) weeks before TR-ROP diagnosis in Mongolia. If low-risk infants were never screened again, the population could be effectively screened with 45.0% (India, 664/1476), 38.4% (Nepal, 151/393), and 51.3% (Mongolia, 266/519) fewer examinations required. Results of this diagnostic study suggest that there were 2 advantages to implementation of this risk model: (1) the number of examinations for low-risk infants could be reduced without missing cases of TR-ROP, and (2) high-risk infants could be identified and closely monitored before development of TR-ROP.

Feasibility of telemedicine program using a hand-held nonmydriatic retinal camera in Panama.

To evaluate the image quality of a telemedicine screening program for retinal disease using a nonmydriatic camera among rural island communities in Bocas del Toro, Panama. In June 2018, a group of three medical students volunteered at clinics operated by the Floating Doctors in the province of Bocas del Toro, Panama. Non-mydriatic images of the retina were obtained using the Pictor Plus (Volk Optical, Mentor OH), randomized, and sent to two board-certified ophthalmologists at the University of California, Irvine for analysis using a modified version of the FOTO-ED scale. Inter-rater reliability was calculated using the kappa statistic. Seventy patients provided a total of 127 images. Average image quality was 3.31, and most frequent image quality was 4/5 on the FOTO-ED scale. Thirty patients had at least one eye image with ideal quality (42.86%), while only one patient had no adequate photos taken (1.43%). However, high quality images were obtained in both eyes in only 12 patients (17.14%). The inter-rater reliability between the two ophthalmologists was 0.614. Further improvements are necessary to acquire higher quality images more reliably. This may include further training and experience or mydriasis.

The Cost-Effectiveness of a Telemedicine Screening Program for Diabetic Retinopathy in New York City.

BackgroundA telemedicine screening initiative was implemented by the Montefiore Health System to improve access to eyecare for a multi-ethnic, at-risk population of diabetic patients in a largely underserved urban community in the Bronx, New York. This retrospective, cross-sectional analysis evaluates the societal benefit and financial sustainability of this program by analyzing both cost and revenue generation based on current standard Medicare reimbursement rates.MethodsNon-mydriatic fundus cameras were placed in collaboration with a vendor in eight outpatient primary care sites throughout the Montefiore Health Care System, and data was collected between June 2014 and July 2016. Fundus photos were electronically transmitted to a central reading center to be systematically reviewed and coded by faculty ophthalmologists, and patients were subsequently scheduled for ophthalmic evaluation based upon a predetermined treatment algorithm. A retrospective chart review of 2251 patients was performed utilizing our electronic medical record system (Epic Systems, Verona WI). Revenue was projected utilizing standard Medicare rates for our region while societal benefit was calculated using quality adjusted life years (QALY).ResultsOf the 2251 patient charts reviewed, 791 patients (35.1%) were seen by Montefiore ophthalmologists within a year of the original screening date. Estimated revenue generated by these visits was $276,800, with the majority from the treatment of retinal disease ($208,535), and the remainder from other ophthalmic conditions detected in the fundus photos ($68,265). There was a societal benefit of 14.66 quality adjusted life years (QALYs) with an estimated value of $35,471/QALY.ConclusionThis telemedicine initiative was successful in identifying many patients with diabetic retinopathy and other ophthalmic conditions who may otherwise not have been formally evaluated. Our analysis demonstrates the program to generate a downstream revenue of nearly $280K with a cost benefit below <50% of the threshold of $100,000/QALY, and therefore cost-effective in marginalized communities.

Cost-Utility Analysis of Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy in China.

Background. Diabetic retinopathy (DR) has been primarily indicated to cause vision impairment and blindness, while no studies have focused on the cost-utility of telemedicine-based and community screening programs for DR in China, especially in rural and urban areas, respectively.Methods. We developed a Markov model to calculate the cost-utility of screening programs for DR in DM patients in rural and urban settings from the societal perspective. The incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) was calculated for the assessment.Results. In the rural setting, the community screening program obtained 1 QALY with a cost of $4179 (95% CI 3859 to 5343), and the telemedicine screening program had an ICUR of $2323 (95% CI 1023 to 3903) compared with no screening, both of which satisfied the criterion of a significantly cost-effective health intervention. Likewise, community screening programs in urban areas generated an ICUR of $3812 (95% CI 2906 to 4167) per QALY gained, with telemedicine screening at an ICUR of $2437 (95% CI 1242 to 3520) compared with no screening, and both were also cost-effective. By further comparison, compared to community screening programs, telemedicine screening yielded an ICUR of 1212 (95% CI 896 to 1590) per incremental QALY gained in rural setting and 1141 (95% CI 859 to 1403) in urban setting, which both meet the criterion for a significantly cost-effective health intervention.Conclusions. Both telemedicine and community screening for DR in rural and urban settings were cost-effective in China, and telemedicine screening programs were more cost-effective.

Development of a Telemedicine Screening Program During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Background: Telemedicine use increased during the COVID-19 pandemic due to concerns for patient and provider safety. Given the lack of testing resources initially and the large geographical range served by Augusta University (AU), a telemedicine platform with up-to-date screening guidelines was implemented for COVID-19 testing in March 2020. Our objective was to understand the level of adherence to telemedicine screening guidelines for COVID-19. Methods: The study population included health care providers and population who participated in an encounter in the AU Health Express Care virtual care program from March 22 to May 21, 2020. All encounters were intended to be for COVID-19 screening, free, and available 24 h per day, 7 days per week. Screening guidelines were developed by AU based on information from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Georgia Department of Public Health. Results: Among 17,801 total encounters, 13,600 were included in the final analysis. Overall adherence to screening guidelines was 71% in the adult population and 57% in the pediatric population. When providers did not follow guidelines, 72% determined that the patient should have a positive screen. Guidelines themselves determined that only 52% of encounters should have a positive screen. Providers' specialty significantly correlated with guideline adherence (p = 0.002). Departments with the highest adherence were psychiatry, neurology, and ophthalmology. No significant correlation was found between guideline adherence and provider degree/position. Conclusions: This study provides proof of concept of a free telehealth screening platform during an ongoing pandemic. Our screening experience was effective and different specialties participated. Our patient population lived in lower than average income zip codes, suggesting that our free telemedicine screening program successfully reached populations with higher financial barriers to health care. Early training and a posteriori knowledge of telemedicine was likely key to screening guideline adherence.

A 15 month experience with a primary care-based telemedicine screening program for diabetic retinopathy

BackgroundUsing telemedicine for diabetic retinal screening is becoming popular especially amongst at-risk urban communities with poor access to care. The goal of the diabetic telemedicine project at Temple University Hospital is to improve cost-effective access to appropriate retinal care to those in need of close monitoring and/or treatment.MethodsThis will be a retrospective review of 15 months of data from March 2016 to May 2017. We will investigate how many patients were screened, how interpretable the photographs were, how often the photographs generated a diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy (DR) based on the screening photo, and how many patients followed-up for an exam in the office, if indicated.ResultsSix-hundred eighty-nine (689) digital retinal screening exams on 1377 eyes of diabetic patients were conducted in Temple’s primary care clinic. The majority of the photographs were read to have no retinopathy (755, 54.8%). Among all of the screening exams, 357 (51.8%) triggered a request for a referral to ophthalmology. Four-hundred forty-nine (449, 32.6%) of the photos were felt to be uninterpretable by the clinician. Referrals were meant to be requested for DR found in one or both eyes, inability to assess presence of retinopathy in one or both eyes, or for suspicion of a different ophthalmic diagnosis. Sixty-seven patients (9.7%) were suspected to have another ophthalmic condition based on other findings in the retinal photographs. Among the 34 patients that were successfully completed a referral visit to Temple ophthalmology, there was good concordance between the level of DR detected by their screening fundus photographs and visit diagnosis.ConclusionsAlthough a little more than half of the patients did not have diabetic eye disease, about half needed a referral to ophthalmology. However, only 9.5% of the referral-warranted exams actually received an eye exam. Mere identification of referral-warranted diabetic retinopathy and other ophthalmic conditions is not enough. A successful telemedicine screening program must close the communication gap between screening and diagnosis by reviewer to provide timely follow-up by eye care specialists.

Mobile Screening Units for the Early Detection of Breast Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease: A Pilot Telemedicine Study in Southern Italy.

Introduction: Telemedicine is the use of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) to improve patient outcomes by increasing access to care, medical information and services. The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate and support the implementation of screening and early detection programs in the prevention of breast cancer and cardiovascular diseases with the establishment of a remote diagnosis through the use of ICT in mobile units. Materials and Methods: A total of 430 individuals were recruited in an area of Southern Italy. Particularly, 321 women were recruited to undergo breast cancer screening in accordance with Italian guidelines. Likewise, cardiovascular screening interested 109 subjects. A self-contained mobile unit with connectivity was provided to offer breast and cardiovascular screenings. To maximize the benefit, we have evaluated the return of investment. Results: The telemedicine screening program allowed the detection of early pathologies. In breast cancer screening, 40.8% of cases were negative to lesions, 34.9% were positive to benign lesions, and 3.1% presented suspicious malignant lesions; these lesions were further checked by histological analyses, which showed a positive response in 70% of cases. The cardiovascular screening concerned 109 participants based on age and other risk factors. We observed a significant difference among risk factors in patients with cardiac disease (p < 0.001); particularly, hypertension was significantly the most present risk factor (51.4%, p < 0.05), followed by smoking (28.4%, p < 0.05). A cardiovascular pathology was detected in 40.4% of enrolled subjects. A 3.3:1 return on investment was calculated. Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate that telemedicine may represent a promising approach to deliver several health services, such as screening programs, with users who cannot utilize services in their locations. The use of telemedicine on diagnostic campers greatly reduces the costs of screening for breast cancer and major cardiovascular diseases within the Southern Italian Health Service. We believe that public investment can have a further significant return on investment by implementing the principles of precision medicine.

A Novel Hybrid Fixed and Mobile Ultra-Widefield Imaging Program for Diabetic Teleretinopathy Screening

To describe a new approach for telemedicine screening of diabetic retinopathy (DR) using a combination of a mobile ultra-widefield camera, mounted in a van and able to travel to areas of need, and several fixed-location cameras in high-volume clinics and to report predictors of DR in a diverse urban population of 2788 patients. Cross-sectional study. Two thousand seven hundred eighty-eight patients enrolled in the San Francisco Health Network who underwent DR screening using the novel hybrid telemedicine system. The study was carried out at Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital in the San Francisco Health Network. A van was specially equipped to allow an ultra-widefield fundus camera to be mounted inside, and the van was sent with a technician to primary care clinics throughout the city on a rotation schedule determined according to clinical need. Additional fundus cameras were placed in several high-volume clinic locations. Patient demographic and clinical information was collected at the time of screening. Photographs were transmitted to a reading center and were graded for DR and other findings by trained readers. Prevalence of DR subtypes and odds ratios for development of DR and proliferative DR (PDR). The hybrid mobile and fixed-location ultra-widefield camera screening system was able to bedeployed to carry out the telemedicine screening program for diabetic patients throughout the city ofSanFrancisco referred for screening during the period of the study. Of 2788 patients screened, 736 (27%)were found to have DR. Of these, 34 (5%) had PDR, and 702 (95%) had nonproliferative DR. In multivariate analysis, factors found to be associated with development of any DR were diabetes duration, hemoglobin A1C level, insulin use, and end-organ damage. Diabetes duration was the only factor associated with PDR. Diabetic retinopathy screening can be accomplished in an urban setting using a combination of fixed-location and mobile ultra-widefield cameras to extend the reach of the screening opportunity throughout a health network. In a diverse group of patients, factors associated with DR and PDR were identified and support ongoing efforts to screen for retinopathy and maintain diabetic control.

Modeling a Telemedicine Screening Program for Diabetic Retinopathy in Iran and Implementing a Pilot Project in Tehran Suburb.

Purpose To model a community-based telescreening program for diabetic retinopathy (DR) in Iran and to implement a pilot project at the Iranian Diabetes Society (IDS) branch in a Tehran suburb. Methods In this mixed model study, a web application called the “Iranian Retinopathy Teleophthalmology Screening (IRTOS)” was launched. The educational course for DR screening was established for general practitioners (GPs). Registered patients in IDS branch were recalled for fundus photography; images were transferred to the reading center via IRTOS to be graded by GPs, and patients were informed about the results via mobile messaging. All images were independently reviewed by a retina specialist as the gold standard. Patients who required further assessment were referred to an eye hospital. Results Overall, 604 subjects with diabetes were screened; of these, 50% required referral. The sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of any stage of DR by trained GPs were 82.8% and 86.2%, respectively, in comparison to the gold standard. The corresponding values for detecting any stage of diabetic macular edema (DME) were 63.5% and 96.6%, respectively. Conclusions Telescreening was an effective method for detecting DR in a Tehran suburb. This screening model demonstrated its capacity for promoting diabetic eye care services at the national level. However, the sensitivity for detecting DME needs to be improved by modifying the referral pathway and promoting the skill of GPs.

Cost analysis of remote telemedicine screening for retinopathy of prematurity

ObjectiveTo compare costs of 2 screening modalities for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP): telemedicine imaging with remote interpretation versus in-person binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy (BIO). DesignRetrospective chart review. ParticipantsInfants from an existing telemedicine screening program at 2 cities in Ontario, Canada. MethodsWe conducted a cost analysis comparison from the perspective of the Ministry of Health. Patient level data was used for the telemedicine group. A hypothetical control group consisted of the minimum number of BIO and interhospital transfers if the existing patients were screened in person. Costs included in-person examinations, transfers, setting up, and ongoing costs of telemedicine screening. Costs were compared using the Mann–Whitney U test and are reported in 2014 Canadian dollars. ResultsA total of 102 and 72 infants were screened from Sudbury and Barrie, respectively; 3% and 2% of infants in the telemedicine group were transferred for BIO from Sudbury and Barrie, respectively. All infants in the control group would have required at least one transfer for BIO. The average total cost per eye examination was $4855 ± $5616 and $4540 ± $3129 for the telemedicine group and $19 834 ± $13 814 and $2429 ± $1664 for the control group from Sudbury and Barrie, respectively (p < 0.001). Interhospital transfer cost for the control group was $19 489 ± $13 605 and $2055 ± $1471 compared to $635 ± $3968 and $30 ± $197 for the telemedicine group (p < 0.001) in Sudbury and Barrie, respectively. ConclusionsTelemedicine appears to be an economically attractive option depending on the location and number of infants screened. This information is useful for planning similar ROP screening programs.

A decade-long telemedicine screening program for diabetic retinopathy in the north-east of Italy

AimTo describe a decade long telemedicine screening for diabetic retinopathy (DR) in the metropolitan area of Padova (North-East Italy) and to report about prevalence/incidence of DR and maculopathy, rate of progression to STDR and optimal screening interval in patients with no DR at first examination. MethodsObservational, longitudinal, cohort study; 9347 patients with Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) underwent 17,344 fundus exams (three-45° color photos per eye) in two diabetes clinics and were graded in the Reading Centre, by certified personnel. The incidence of STDR, progression of maculopathy and risk factors were evaluated by log Rank test (Kaplan–Meier method). A receiver operating curve was used to determine the optimal screening interval in patients who at the first examination had no DR. ResultsThe overall prevalence of DR was 27.6%:12.5% mild non proliferative (NPDR), 11.3% moderate NPDR, 2.9% severe NPDR and 0.9% proliferative (PDR). The overall prevalence of maculopathy was 5.7%: 2.8% mild, 2.2% moderate, and 0.7% severe maculopathy. The 10-year incidence of STDR was: 0.6% in no DR, 5.5% in mild NPDR and 21.1% in moderate NPDR at first examination. The 10-year incidence of maculopathy was: 2.1% mild, 1.7% moderate and 0.2% severe. The incidence of STDR in patients with type 1 and type 2 DM and duration>10years was 8.21% and 8.15%;in type 1 DM with duration <10years was 5.5% and in type 2 DM and duration <10years was 1.91%.In patients with no DR at first screening, the best (sensitivity-specificity) follow-up interval is 2.5years. ConclusionsScreening every 2.5-year in patients without DR at the first examination seems to be adequate. Duration of disease is a relevant risk factor for progression to STDR, however patients with type 1 DM and duration <10years have greater incidence of STDR than patients with type 2 DM and similar disease duration. Epidemiologic data from this decade-long screening program in the North East of Italy may serve for implementing a national screening program.

Impact of number and quality of retinal images in a telemedicine screening program for ROP: results from the e-ROP study

Telemedicine for the detection of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is becoming increasingly common; however, obtaining the required multiple retinal images from an infant can be challenging. This secondary analysis from the Telemedicine Approaches to Evaluating Acute-Phase Retinopathy of Prematurity (e-ROP) study evaluated the detection of referral-warranted ROP (RW-ROP) by trained readers when a full set of 5 retinal images could not be obtained. A total of 7,905 image sets from 1,257 infants in the study were evaluated. Retinal location of images and image quality were recorded. Sensitivity and specificity of RW-ROP detection by trained readers were calculated by comparing findings in incomplete image sets to the findings on standard eye examination. The majority of image sets contained all 5 retinal images (92.8%). The disk center view was the image most likely to be present and to be of acceptable image quality (96.8%). The nasal retina was the most difficult to obtain with acceptable image quality (83.4%). Sensitivity of detection of RW-ROP was 82.1% when 5 retinal images of acceptable quality were submitted for grading, 67.2% when 4 acceptable images were submitted, and 66.7% for 3 or fewer acceptable images (P = 0.02), with corresponding specificity of 82.2%, 89.0%, and 81.7% respectively (P < 0.0001). When images of any quality were evaluated, sensitivity was not increased (P = 0.74). The likelihood of detecting RW-ROP by telemedicine screening is decreased when a full set of retinal images is not obtained.

Impact of number and quality of retinal images in a telemedicine screening program for ROP: results from the e-ROP study

Telemedicine for the detection of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is becoming more common. However, obtaining multiple retinal images from an infant can be challenging. In this secondary analysis of data from the Telemedicine Approaches to Evaluating Acute-Phase Retinopathy of Prematurity (e-ROP) study, we evaluated the accuracy of detection of referral warranted ROP (RW-ROP) by trained readers when a full set of five retinal images could not be obtained.

Cost analysis of remote telemedicine screening for retinopathy of prematurity

Abstract Objective To compare costs of 2 screening modalities for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP): telemedicine imaging with remote interpretation versus in-person binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy (BIO). Design Retrospective chart review. Participants Infants from an existing telemedicine screening program at 2 cities in Ontario, Canada. Methods We conducted a cost analysis comparison from the perspective of the Ministry of Health. Patient level data was used for the telemedicine group. A hypothetical control group consisted of the minimum number of BIO and interhospital transfers if the existing patients were screened in person. Costs included in-person examinations, transfers, setting up, and ongoing costs of telemedicine screening. Costs were compared using the Mann–Whitney U test and are reported in 2014 Canadian dollars. Results A total of 102 and 72 infants were screened from Sudbury and Barrie, respectively; 3% and 2% of infants in the telemedicine group were transferred for BIO from Sudbury and Barrie, respectively. All infants in the control group would have required at least one transfer for BIO. The average total cost per eye examination was $4855 ± $5616 and $4540 ± $3129 for the telemedicine group and $19 834 ± $13 814 and $2429 ± $1664 for the control group from Sudbury and Barrie, respectively (p Conclusions Telemedicine appears to be an economically attractive option depending on the location and number of infants screened. This information is useful for planning similar ROP screening programs.

Diabetes eye screening in urban settings serving minority populations: detection of diabetic retinopathy and other ocular findings using telemedicine.

The use of a nonmydriatic camera for retinal imaging combined with the remote evaluation of images at a telemedicine reading center has been advanced as a strategy for diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening, particularly among patients with diabetes mellitus from ethnic/racial minority populations with low utilization of eye care. To examine the rate and types of DR identified through a telemedicine screening program using a nonmydriatic camera, as well as the rate of other ocular findings. A cross-sectional study (Innovative Network for Sight [INSIGHT]) was conducted at 4 urban clinic or pharmacy settings in the United States serving predominantly ethnic/racial minority and uninsured persons with diabetes. Participants included persons aged 18 years or older who had type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus and presented to the community-based settings. The percentage of DR detection, including type of DR, and the percentage of detection of other ocular findings. A total of 1894 persons participated in the INSIGHT screening program across sites, with 21.7% having DR in at least 1 eye. The most common type of DR was background DR, which was present in 94.1% of all participants with DR. Almost half (44.2%) of the sample screened had ocular findings other than DR; 30.7% of the other ocular findings were cataract. In a DR telemedicine screening program in urban clinic or pharmacy settings in the United States serving predominantly ethnic/racial minority populations, DR was identified on screening in approximately 1 in 5 persons with diabetes. The vast majority of DR was background, indicating high public health potential for intervention in the earliest phases of DR when treatment can prevent vision loss. Other ocular conditions were detected at a high rate, a collateral benefit of DR screening programs that may be underappreciated.

Evaluation of Telemedicine for Screening of Diabetic Retinopathy in the Veterans Health Administration

To explore the cost-effectiveness of telemedicine for the screening of diabetic retinopathy (DR) and identify changes within the demographics of a patient population after telemedicine implementation. A retrospective medical chart review (cohort study) was conducted. A total of 900 type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients enrolled in a medical system with a telemedicine screening program for DR. The cost-effectiveness of the DR telemedicine program was determined by using a finite-horizon, discrete time, discounted Markov decision process model populated by parameters and testing frequency obtained from patient records. The model estimated the progression of DR and determined average quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) saved and average additional cost incurred by the telemedicine screening program. Diabetic retinopathy, macular edema, blindness, and associated QALYs. The results indicate that telemedicine screening is cost-effective for DR under most conditions. On average, it is cost-effective for patient populations of >3500, patients aged <80 years, and all racial groups. Observable trends were identified in the screening population since the implementation of telemedicine screening: the number of known DR cases has increased, the overall age of patients receiving screenings has decreased, the percentage of nonwhites receiving screenings has increased, the average number of miles traveled by a patient to receive a screening has decreased, and the teleretinal screening participation is increasing. The current teleretinal screening program is effective in terms of being cost-effective and increasing population reach. Future screening policies should give consideration to the age of patients receiving screenings and the system's patient pool size because our results indicate it is not cost-effective to screen patients aged older than 80 years or in populations with <3500 patients.

Detección de glaucoma mediante telemedicina con SisGlaTel: satisfacción y aceptación entre los participantes y problemas detectados

To evaluate the problems, and the degree of acceptability and satisfaction among participants in a telemedicine screening program. This study forms part of a global project for the design, implementation and evaluation of SisGlaTel funded by the Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias (Spain) and Pfizer Ophthalmics. A telemedicine system was built based on a specific program written in JAVA. The remote station was located at a Primary Care Center. Participants signed an informed consent, and completed a questionnaire and undertook different tests (frequency doubling perimetry-FDT, confocal scanning laser tomografy-HRT and tonometry). Test results and problems detected were analysed. Ninety-nine subjects completed a satisfaction questionnaire after voluntarily participating in the screening program among an at-risk population. The questionnaire included 7 questions, four of which required participants to categorise their responses, ranging from very bad (1) to excellent (5), to questions about the screening program, its usefulness, the care received and the installations. Six hundred and forty-one at-risk subjects were examined. After 2 exams per eye, 22.3% (143) presented abnormal FDT and 4.2% (27) had pathologic HRT. One hundred percent of respondents affirmed they would participate again in a similar program. The mean qualification (SD) was 4.5 (0.6), 4.5 (0.6), 4.8 (0.5), and 4.3 (0.7) for global opinion, usefulness, care and equipment. SisGlaTel allows integration of several diagnostic tests useful for glaucoma tele-screening. The global degree of satisfaction among participants was good.