Despite having been around in one incarnation or another since the early 20th century, as recently as 1995 the full potential of telemedicine—electronic dissemination of medical information over a distance—was still very much underappreciated. A Lancet editorial on the topic asked the question whether this was a fad or the future, and opined on what effect, if any, telemedicine would have on medical practice in the year 2000.1The LancetTelemedicine: fad or future?.Lancet. 1995; 345: 73-74Crossref PubMed Scopus (91) Google Scholar Of course, such discussions could not have even begun to factor in the incalculable boost to be gained from improvements in telecommunications networks and computer-based applications that were just around the corner, leading to an expansion of the landscape of teleconsultation, tele-education, and even telediagnosis, that would be unrecognisable to even the most techno-savvy commentator back then.2Larner AJ Teleneurology: an overview of current status.Pract Neurol. 2011; 11: 283-288Crossref PubMed Scopus (41) Google Scholar Some specialties and more visual disciplines, such as radiology and pathology, lend themselves better to telemedicine than others; accordingly, neurology is a natural fit with the advantages of telemedicine and has even coined its own subspecialty: teleneurology. While teleneurology has been applied to many neurological disorders, such as headache, dementia, movement disorders, and multiple sclerosis, it is in stroke that teleneurological applications have predominated;2Larner AJ Teleneurology: an overview of current status.Pract Neurol. 2011; 11: 283-288Crossref PubMed Scopus (41) Google Scholar, 3Fassbender K Balucani C Walter S Levine SR Haas A Grotta J Streamlining of prehospital stroke management: the golden hour.Lancet Neurol. 2013; 12: 585-596Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (194) Google Scholar however, with new interface technologies comes more potential for telemedical applications in epilepsy.4Holmes D Can technology reveal the ecology of epilepsy?.Lancet Neurol. 2014; 13: 347-348Summary Full Text Full Text PDF Scopus (3) Google Scholar But as the initial problems based on the limitations of the technology platforms have been negated, a whole new tranche of obstacles to the wider adoption of telemedicine seem to have supplanted them, including the questions about the standards used to assess the economic benefits, the socioeconomic effects, the factors that promote uptake, the qualitative methods used, and the design of some of the reported studies.5Ekelend AG Bowes A Flottorp S Methodologies for assessing telemedicine: a systematic review of reviews.Int J Med Inform. 2013; 81: 1-11Summary Full Text Full Text PDF Scopus (121) Google Scholar However, reiteration of the requirements still needed can only be for the good and make the wider integration of telemedicine achievable.
Read full abstract