Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common form of cardiac arrhythmia afflicting patients presenting to cardiologists and general practitioners in Australia. However, ablation procedures for the treatment of AF are amongst the most complex and time consuming cardiac imaging procedures. This study reviews the adoption of a visualisation and navigation system (MediGuide) and the impact this has on overall procedural radiation risk. Methods: Records for 181 AF ablation procedures performed by an experienced Electrophysiologist between February 2012 and December 2014 using a single imaging system were analysed. These procedures comprised 151 conventional radiofrequency (RF) ablations using 3D mapping (49 grid, 102 gridless) and 30 using the MediGuide system. Radiation measures including Fluoroscopy time (FT) and estimated Effective Dose (E) were compared. Results/Discussion: Use of the MediGuide system markedly reduced FTs by comparison to conventional RF ablation techniques (4.8min vs. 18.5min gridless and 22.5min grid). Median E for MediGuide was 0.11mSv compared with 0.88mSv and 0.40mSv for conventional RF (with and without grid). Median total procedure time for MediGuide was 147min compared with 125 minutes for conventional RF procedures. Prolongation of procedure time was linked to a learning curve and a preference to use MediGuide in complex redo procedures. Conclusion: This study emphasises the need for careful evaluation and optimisation of new technologies to ensure progression in efforts to reduce radiation risks associated with complex imaging procedures. Use of the MediGuide technology has substantially reduced the radiation risks for both patients and clinical staff involved in AF ablation procedures.
Read full abstract