ABSTRACT Quality control in pavement construction traditionally relies on density measurements of geomaterials. With the introduction of modulus measurement methods, a shift has occurred due to the operational advantages of modulus-estimating devices over conventional density measurement techniques. Modulus-based methods also provide valuable information for the mechanistic-empirical (ME) design of pavement layers. However, a challenge emerges as a single modulus measurement does not directly correspond to a specific density measurement, leading to concerns about replacing density measurements in quality control processes. While it is generally accepted that a geomaterial's modulus primarily depends on its moisture content and density or void ratio, this study explores the complex relationship between modulus and density, particularly in field scenarios with consistent moisture content. Using three different laboratory-scale test set-ups, characterised by unique loading and boundary conditions, the research highlights the significant role of a geomaterial's initial state in obtaining accurate modulus estimates. The results reveal that identical densities can exhibit variations in modulus due to differences in initial densities and the development of residual lateral stresses. These variations in field conditions often stem from different paving or spreading techniques, emphasising the need for a comprehensive approach when establishing density-modulus correlations..