This study assessed the feasibility of an interview protocol to examine international Chinese doctorate students' supervision in Malaysia. It is carried out from a larger study that seeks to address gaps in the literature on these students' problems, supervision dynamics, and coping methods, given their importance in academic and cultural interchange. The initial design involved a comprehensive literature review, interview procedure development, and field expert and target student input. The respondents evaluated the interview protocol's clarity, relevance, cultural sensitivity, and linguistic ease indicated a need for revisions to improve understanding and application. Half of participants assessed the procedure as straightforward, however cultural sensitivity and language limitations were recognized as areas for improvement. On the other hand, five experts recommended simplifying technical language, including open-ended questions, and adjusting for cultural and educational variation to make the procedure useful for future study. The findings revealed that although the interview protocol's basic design is strong, adding the proposed improvements would improve its relevance, clarity, and cultural appropriateness. These upgrades should make data gathering easier, help us understand the international doctorate student experience in Malaysia, and shape future educational policy. Academicians and politicians might use the revised methodology to correctly capture Chinese PhD students' complex experiences to improve supervisory and academic assistance in Malaysian institutions.