Drilling Automation The word “automation” is a catchall for a detailed set of levels of control; 10 in fact. And each will be applied in a different way. As each system climbs the scale, one rung at a time, pushing it up will be increasingly accurate algorithms and computer models. According to robotics pioneer Thomas Sheridan’s levels of automation, at the most base level, systems are simply advisers with no control whatsoever. Toward the middle of the scale, humans take on more of a supervisory role, or as some phrase it, “are kept in the loop.” The highest level involves automated systems that ask for no help from humans while doing their tasks, and actually ignore them, with the exception of override systems to initiate emergency shutdowns. “Once we get to the point where there is full automation, there are going to be some exciting and radical new changes that take place,” said John Hedengren, an assistant professor of chemical engineering at Brigham Young University, who leads a research team on drilling automation and works with SPE’s Drilling Systems Automation Technical Section (DSATS) on data quality assurance for automation. Hedengren underscores his optimism for what is yet to come by citing Moore’s Law, which has astutely predicted the exponential improvements seen in computer processing over the past half century. In the last 15 years, Hedengren said computing speed has increased by 1,000 times, while in the same time span, some of the algorithms for drilling optimization have also improved by 1,000 times. “If you put those two together, it is actually a million times faster to run some of the same problems that we were running just 15 years ago,” he said. For automation, it means what was impossible to do even 5 years ago is achievable today by the convergence of advanced computing technology and advanced measuring devices that feed drilling information into the models for constant readjustments.