Successful recruiting and retaining of R&D professionals depends upon a company's ability to address the needs of recent graduates in their work environment. These needs can be identified by assessing job perceptions of new professionals, and an understanding of these needs can suggest strategies to maintain job satisfaction, provide motivation and encourage creativity. In the case of recent graduates, job perceptions change rapidly as employees make the transition from academia to industry. Recently, I investigated how job perceptions change as recent graduates adapt to the work environment. The relative importance of various factors was determined at three points early in a professional's career: during the recruiting process, upon starting the first job, and after gaining experience in industry. The results are interpreted in terms of needs related to technical work, career advancement and quality of life. Two groups of recent graduates employed in the chemical industry were surveyed and interviewed for comparison. First, 18 recent graduates were surveyed who were employed at the W. R. Grace Washington Research Center and who graduated with their last technical degree between January 1985 and January 1989. This group consisted primarily of chemical engineers and chemists with bachelor's-, master's-, and doctoral degrees. Second, I interviewed 10 Ph.D. chemical engineers who graduated from the University of California, Berkeley in 1985-1986 and who were each employed at a different R&D laboratory. While the database for this investigation was limited, the consistency between the two groups suggests that the results represent important trends. Further, the general conclusions concerning job perceptions and needs are not specific to a single company or a single graduating school, but I believe represent characteristics of the current generation of new professionals. This belief is based on the observation that recent professionals from different companies and from different schools expressed similar opinions and concerns about their jobs, although job-related specifics varied from person to person. The common factor among all the respondents is that they were all employed in R&D functions at major chemical companies. Factors Affecting Job Decisions Respondents were asked to rank 12 factors as to the influence they had on their job decision. Based upon the responses, the factors fall into categories of high, moderate and low levels of relative importance (Table 1 not included). Geographic preferences and personal or family considerations are important job-decision factors, as is the competitiveness of the salary offer. The type of initial project, the impressions made by direct management during the interview, and the perceived potential for career advancement can be influential. These results confirm the importance to the interview process of location, salary and technical work environment. Of particular interest is the finding that management involvement is a key factor in job decisions. Of moderate importance are factors related to employee benefit programs, the company reputation, and the degree of initial project responsibility. The first two factors suggest that job decisions are influenced by company policies. The last factor emphasizes the importance of independence to the graduate. Factors of least relative importance are the freedom to publish, potential for travel and social environment. Hence, these factors would not be expected to have a strong impact on the job decision. Initial Job Expectations Initial job expectations were assessed by surveying recent graduates about job perceptions when they started their new job. These perceptions were established by prioritizing a second set of 12 factors on a scale from 1 to 3, with 1 representing the highest importance. Figure 1 shows the 12 factors ranked top to bottom from most to least important The bars represent the deviation of the average response for each factor relative to the mean response of all the factors combined. …