The study generally aimed to investigate the extent of compatibility in decision making between the school administrators and their faculty in public and private tertiary schools in Region XII. The descriptive method of research was employed in this study. Specifically, this may be classified as descriptive-comparative whereby at least two groups are compared on criterion data. The respondents of this study included 302 faculty members and 96 administrators in 12 selected tertiary institutions in Region XII. These school are composed of six public schools and six private schools. A purposive sampling was employed in this study. The main sources of the data for this study were the respondents’ scores in the areas related to leadership styles and interpersonal relationships. The leadership style may either be person-oriented or task-oriented on three (3) areas, namely: (1) personnel administration, (2) academic administration, and (3) business administration. Interpersonal relationship may either be wholesome or unwholesome relationship on seven (7) areas, namely: (1) communication process and pattern, (2) use of motivation, (3) interaction-influence process, (4) decision making process, (5) goal setting in organization, (6) control process, and (7) performance. Two sets of questionnaires were used in gathering data for this research. One was for the administrators and the other one for the faculty members. The questionnaires are similar in content. Both questionnaires consist of three parts: (a) personal data, (b) leadership styles, and (c) interpersonal relationships. The mean was the principal statistical measure used in the analysis done for research questions 1 and 2. For research questions 3 and 4, the t-test was employed to test difference between means with the level of significance of 0.05. In the areas of academic and business administration, the administrator and the faculty respondents generally exhibited person-oriented leadership style. In personnel administration area, the faculty respondents exhibited task-oriented leadership style while the administrators exhibited person-oriented leadership style. The administrators and the faculty members on both public and private tertiary schools generally exhibited wholesome interpersonal relationships. In public tertiary schools, the leadership styles exhibited by the administrators and those of their faculty subordinates were generally not compatible. On the other hand, in private tertiary schools, leadership styles of administrators and their faculty subordinates were compatible in all three areas of decision making. In public tertiary schools, the decision making exhibited by administrators and their faculty subordinates in the areas of interpersonal relationships are generally not compatible. In private tertiary schools, the administrators and those of their faculty subordinates are generally compatible in their decision making in the areas of interpersonal relationship.
Read full abstract